Dontaes Boxing Nation EXPOSES Barbershop Conversations and channels

[Thuglife Nelo]

I knew there would be no changing your mind

Yeah let’s shake hands now, and next week I’ll start a thread about you lying!

[Chollo Vista]

Yeah let’s shake hands now, and next week I’ll start a thread about you lying!

Ok man you're right

[ggg_kz]

This whole back and forth between these two users, between Ward and Barber, between Dontae and Barber, etc is a phenomena that Jordan Peterson accurately describes and predicts: conflict and division between individuals that carry an agenda of identity politics.

"Tribalism has a central problem — and it’s not competition, despite the tendency of competition to produce, at least temporarily, winners and losers. it’s cooperation, because cooperation is what allows us to exist as bounded groups. A group, by definition is a collective cooperatively aiming at something. It can’t be aimed at nothing, because nothing cannot unite. It only divides. Thus, attacks on collective purpose, because of its tendency to produce tribalism, merely divides. The politics of identity, which emerge when the central purpose is criticized too destructively, inevitably produce the situation described in the story of the Tower of Babel: Everyone fragments into primitive tribes and speaks their own language."

The group does not suffer – only those who compose it.

[vaborikua2014]

Yeah let’s shake hands now, and next week I’ll start a thread about you lying!

You're trying to change BC aka Fred's(chollo vistas) mind while hes using his boxingscene persona.

[Thuglife Nelo]

This whole back and forth between these two users, between Ward and Barber, between Dontae and Barber, etc is a phenomena that Jordan Peterson accurately describes and predicts: conflict and division between individuals that carry an agenda of identity politics.

"Tribalism has a central problem — and it’s not competition, despite the tendency of competition to produce, at least temporarily, winners and losers. it’s cooperation, because cooperation is what allows us to exist as bounded groups. A group, by definition is a collective cooperatively aiming at something. It can’t be aimed at nothing, because nothing cannot unite. It only divides. Thus, attacks on collective purpose, because of its tendency to produce tribalism, merely divides. The politics of identity, which emerge when the central purpose is criticized too destructively, inevitably produce the situation described in the story of the Tower of Babel: Everyone fragments into primitive tribes and speaks their own language."

The group does not suffer – only those who compose it.

You do realize Golovkin, Loeffler, and Herman Brothers are in litigation to resolve monies? You want to call that “back and forth?”

[SkillspayBills]

Your interpreting Ward’s tweet to suit your agenda. Misinterpretation is expected. As Dontae said, Barbershop is just an opportunist. This guys said he “cried when Ward retired.” Man oh man

The man literally provided you the factual tweet yet you choose to cover your eyes and ignore the truth. Ward questioned Wilder's heart and then tried to change what he said after he was called out on it. Point blank period.

[DaNeutral.]

I heard what that type of channel was saying about Ward, it was disgusting. Whether Ward hates on Wilder or was offering a Boxers opinion based on a Boxers options its not the point the point is because Ward said something the LDBC didnt agree with they started up with the racism. They called Ward a half cast, not really black, a coon and all that usual business.

Even after he confronted Barbershop, is it Geoff and argued his case to him the LDBC were split and those that actually let him be on it claimed to just LET HIM OFF THIS TIME CUZ HE HAD A WHITE MOMENT and a COON MOMENT.

[Thuglife Nelo]

The man literally provided you the factual tweet yet you choose to cover your eyes and ignore the truth. Ward questioned Wilder's heart and then tried to change what he said after he was called out on it. Point blank period.

“I don’t think Wilder wants to go through that again...”.

Let’s keep this simple. Did Wilder outbox Fury? If Ward saw mistakes that he thinks Fury could see, is his opinion wrong if he believes Fury would most likely win the rematch? Let say hypothetically Wilder loses in the the rematch, and it’s wide on all cards. Would people respect Ward’s opinion that perhaps Wilder didn’t like that style from Fury? Again, did Wilder outclass Fury?

Now, here’s the point. Everything I just said revolves around theory for how to win a fight. Regardless of the outcome of Ward vs Kovalev, why does Fred Sharpton paint a narrative that it’s about race?

The non pro-everybody brigade assumes Ward would choose a racial side? Ward has no obligation to promote the opportunists position to stir race into simple debates about STYLE.

[ggg_kz]

You do realize Golovkin, Loeffler, and Herman Brothers are in litigation to resolve monies? You want to call that “back and forth?”

what does this litigation have to do with identity politics games you play? A typical troll red herring fallacy

[Thuglife Nelo]

what does this litigation have to do with identity politics games you play? A typical troll red herring fallacy

I play? I’m not in litigation with Hermann Bros., nor is anyone here “Ward vs Fred Sharpton”