Originally posted by minemax
View Post
What do you think it's going to be? An undisputed 175 champ by end of 2019 would be great!
Originally posted by bballchump11
View Post
Gvozdyk won that fight, and the WBC light heavyweight world championship along with it, only 3 months ago. If you read this article, he says "my goal is to unify with the other champions in 2019." When Al Haymon controlled this belt for 5 years straight, he made ZERO unification fights. Gvozdyk is saying his goal is to unify within only ONE year.
So let's wait and see. Let's see if at the end of 2019, will Gvozdyk have lapped Al Haymon once, or perhaps even twice? Or, will he not deliver on what he's saying right now? In that case, even though it will only have been on year without unifications compared to FIVE (or so) that we just saw under Al Haymon, I will criticize Gvozdyk and Top Rank, for sure. You know why? Because, apparently, I have at least five times higher standards than many PBC fans, when it comes to boxing, at least based on this example. Because I guarantee you, if Gvozdyk does not fight a top opponent in 2019, the way Stevenson barely did for 5 years, I am going to criticize his whole team, whereas most PBC fans did not do the same with Stevenson, at least not until 4 years or so passed and he got old. Had he still been young, I bet even then they would have defended it, just like they still defend Wilder even though he spent just as much time as Stevenson cherry picking earlier in his career even during peak athletic years, including his late twenties.
And no, Im not backtracking at all. I said unifications, now I said "top opponents." Unification is just the best way to compare apples to apples to what Haymon did when he had the belt. But I was never someone who said "Stevenson needs to unify, just fighting top guys doesn't count." No, I said I wanted him to fight top opponents, whether that was Kovalev (unification) or Andre Ward coming up from 175 (top opponent despite not being unification). So Gvozdyk either needs to unify, OR fight a top opponent. I'm not trying to be vague, I just don't want my opinion on certain things to speak for others. For example, one possibility that's been mentioned has been Gvozdyk vs Zurdo. Now to me, I rate Zurdo fairly highly, and I think he'll be much better at 175, possibly elite at 175. Unfortunately what that means is, if Gvozdyk fights him early on at 175, before Zurdo proves himself vs someone else, Gvozdyk might not get as much credit for it as he deserves, based on how much Zurdo struggled his last couple fights at 168 (but I think that's the weight cut. Just look how Machado lost to someone IMO far below his level at 130 because he was drained. He and Zurdo have similarities. At least Zurdo still won).
So I probably wouldn't advise Gvozdyk to fight Zurdo yet, because it's a low reward fight in terms of legacy, at least until Zurdo proves he's elite afterwards but that's never a surething he can bounce back if you beat him up badly. But if you don't beat him then obviously you won't get credit either. So it's lose/lose.
So that's a fight I'd leave up to you to judge whether you think that should count as a top opponent or not. If not, then just unifications, and that's fine with me. After all, it's what Gvozdyk said is his goal in 2019. So instead of criticizing him 4 months after winning a belt he had to wait years to even get his chance at, because of the typical favoritism and delaying tactics between the WBC and Al Haymon, why don't you wait and see if Gvozdyk delivers on what he says he wants to do? Cuz I have a hunch that because none of these new champs are with Al Haymon, they are going to be willing to move the division along at a much faster, more exciting pace than fans got to see when Haymon controlled the WBC belt in that division.
Comment