Comments Thread For: Gilberto Ramirez Parts Ways With Trainer, Manager

[asgarth]

Abraham’s eye shut, he was unable to continue and ruled a Referee Technical Decision. It’s NOT a KO, TKO or anything else you want to assume. If you are the same BoxRec fan as I suspect, you’ll call it whatever you want such as retired and also consider it a KO, TKO or some fairytale ending. Fact of the matter is Abraham was not knocked out or his record would reflect a KO or TKO. BoxRec is hazardous to your casual bro, give it up...

You are wrong on so many accounts.

1) A Referee technical decision = RTD is considered a knockout loss. Ask any betting side you casual.

2) Abrahams corner stopped the fight due to the swelling

3) The swelling was due to legal punches, those it cant be a technical decision. It also cant also ruled a technical decision, because the fight didnt last more than 4 rounds (Thats what your own source is telling you)

4) Lomachenko has 4 RTD's on his record and those wins all count towards his knockout record. Were those also technical decisions?

[PoserExposer]

Show me his TKO or KO loss...you can’t.

Peace casual...

You are wrong on so many accounts.

1) A Referee technical decision = RTD is considered a knockout loss. Ask any betting side you casual.

2) Abrahams corner stopped the fight due to the swelling

3) The swelling was due to legal punches, those it cant be a technical decision. It also cant also ruled a technical decision, because the fight didnt last more than 4 rounds (Thats what your own source is telling you)

4) Lomachenko has 4 RTD's on his record and those wins all count towards his knockout record. Were those also technical decisions?

[PoserExposer]

And for the record ASSgarth, I don’t usually waste time with you BoxRec types. Lace a pair of gloves in your life, then opine on the sweet science. Otherwise, up your Google Or Wikipedia game or whatever casual resources you use...

You are wrong on so many accounts.

1) A Referee technical decision = RTD is considered a knockout loss. Ask any betting side you casual.

2) Abrahams corner stopped the fight due to the swelling

3) The swelling was due to legal punches, those it cant be a technical decision. It also cant also ruled a technical decision, because the fight didnt last more than 4 rounds (Thats what your own source is telling you)

4) Lomachenko has 4 RTD's on his record and those wins all count towards his knockout record. Were those also technical decisions?

[UNBIASED BOXING]

Stiegletz was outboxing and winning the fight and landing bombs...

lol

I mean, that was only in the second fight. Abraham and Stiegletz fought four times, and I'm pretty sure Abraham won 2-3 of the remaining fights.

Not to mention, Carl Froch & Eubank Jr (lol, maybe it's a mistake to mention him) couldn't drop or knockout Abraham themselves.

[asgarth]

And for the record ASSgarth, I don’t usually waste time with you BoxRec types. Lace a pair of gloves in your life, then opine on the sweet science. Otherwise, up your Google Or Wikipedia game or whatever casual resources you use...

Cant you reply to arguments? You dont seem to have proper reading comprehension.

I competed in the Amateur Scene in Germany. Had around 2 dozen fights. So thats that.

Please reply to the Points I made, otherwise we are wasting our time.

1) RTD is considered a knockout loss. It's when the fight is stopped inbetween rounds.
For example: Someone gets cut from legal punches. Referee doesnt step in during the round, but they assess the cut inbetween rounds and then stop the fight => Fighter cant continue due to damage from legal punches ==> Knockout loss.

Again, ask any betting site. Winning by RTD is considered a knockout win.

2) A Technical decision cant be ruled before the completion of the fourth round. Can you at least agree with that. It's not a big deal to admit it, if you are wrong.

3) Abraham retired inbetween rounds, Rigondeaux retired inbetween rounds, as did Marriaga, Sosa and Walters. Alll those are ruled a knockout win. Whats so different to understand?

4) If the fight was in any way a decision win, they would have announced the scorecards for that fight. Did they? No they didnt.

5) Vanes Vs Lara I was a technical decision draw, Mares Vs Gutierrez was a technical decision win, Abraham Vs Stieglitz is not a technical decision.

[WarHagler]

Then why do you think another man is "hot" ???
When someone says that about another person then that means they find that person extremely attractive,.....
Are you an undercover
F A G G??

Homie girls call other girls pretty and shizz and no one say anything , why is gay when another man does it to another man .

[BigStomps]

Homie girls call other girls pretty and shizz and no one say anything , why is gay when another man does it to another man .

So you're a homegirl then???
You a biitch with a **** then???

[ShoulderRoll]

Ramirez should look into training with the Reynosos or Robert Garcia.

[jmrf4435]

And by the way, you HAVE been exposed. For fphucks sake, at least do a f******** Google search and at least try not to get exposed as the casual that you are jabroni. You’re too easy to correct, I’m ashamed for even educating you! Oh and learn the unified rules of boxing so you know the difference between a KO and a Technical Decision. It goes like this:

If an accidental foul causes an injury severe enough for the referee to stop the bout after four ( 4) rounds have occurred, the bout will result in a TECHNICAL DECISION awarded to the boxer who is ahead on the score cards at the time the bout is stopped.

Youve been EXPOSED!

hahahaam accidental fouls do not disprove my point. You call people casuals but I honestly think you are a casual.

Zurdo is trash and will be bludgeoned at 175. YOU OK?

[jmrf4435]

You mean the same Arthur Abraham that beat Stieglitz 3 times, twice by decision and a TKO? Yeah “lol”...that Arthur Abraham? You’re f******** CLUELESS alright...

He still got his ass beat by him. And the fact a 6'3 trash Zurdo couldn't hurt him is beyond pathetic.