Comments Thread For: Pacquiao: If No Floyd - Bring on Thurman, Spence, Garcia, Porter!
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Ok now you’re just making stuff up. No one credible was saying Mayweather was too old to fight anybody until now that he’s retired. No one was pushing for him to fight any of the younger WW’s because most people believed they either weren’t a real threat or had no interest in seing those fights. No one cared if he fought Crawford. No one seriously cared if he fought Spence because Spence hadn’t fought anyone significant and would generate no interest. A few people might’ve had an interest in seing him against Thurman but that was minor. If anything some people were clamoring for him to fight Golovkon but the criticism was for the size differences if anything. If Mayweather wasn’t RETIRED his name would be associated as an opponent with all of them.Floyd fans were critising people for calling Floyd out. The Floyd fans who weren't criticizing them certainly weren't putting pressure on Floyd though to fight them, citeing he is retiring and wanting retirement fight? How many times has Floyd retired and unretired so just excuse for Floyd to not fight anyone.
Pac S best of era, the standards for pac are higher
Again, only a delusional fan would say Pacquiao’s standard was higher.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Why didn't Floyd just fight toughest opponent available? Why so many excuses?Ok now you’re just making stuff up. No one credible was saying Mayweather was too old to fight anybody until now that he’s retired. No one was pushing for him to fight any of the younger WW’s because most people believed they either weren’t a real threat or had no interest in seing those fights. No one cared if he fought Crawford. No one seriously cared if he fought Spence because Spence hadn’t fought anyone significant and would generate no interest. A few people might’ve had an interest in seing him against Thurman but that was minor. If anything some people were clamoring for him to fight Golovkon but the criticism was for the size differences if anything. If Mayweather wasn’t RETIRED his name would be associated as an opponent with all of them.
Again, only a delusional fan would say Pacquiao’s standard was higher.
Spence, Crawford were nobodies? They were potentially going to rule for a long time once Floyd went. Berto certainly werent.
Floyd criticised enough, there was no reason to not fight them. Just begging for more critisicm.Comment
-
man stfu!!! why you acting like floyd's been retired for 15 years or something?? nobody was calling floyd to fight the younger ww??? if i remember everyone was telling floyd to fight thurman and then he went and fought berto!!! and if spence/crawford were nobody then, guess what? they still nobody now!!! why you act like floyd's been retired for ages?? LOL!!!Ok now you’re just making stuff up. No one credible was saying Mayweather was too old to fight anybody until now that he’s retired. No one was pushing for him to fight any of the younger WW’s because most people believed they either weren’t a real threat or had no interest in seing those fights. No one cared if he fought Crawford. No one seriously cared if he fought Spence because Spence hadn’t fought anyone significant and would generate no interest. A few people might’ve had an interest in seing him against Thurman but that was minor. If anything some people were clamoring for him to fight Golovkon but the criticism was for the size differences if anything. If Mayweather wasn’t RETIRED his name would be associated as an opponent with all of them.
Again, only a delusional fan would say Pacquiao’s standard was higher.Comment
-
Floyd fights Canelo, you criticize him for fighting "green" fighters. Now you criticize him for not fighting guys with fewer pro fights who are thus "greener". You criticize him for the CW against Canelo, then ask why he didn't fight GGG at 154.After he beats all the guys you posted he needed in order to be an ATG, you then delete the post where you said you'd give him ATG status if he beat all those guys and don't give credit..Why didn't Floyd just fight toughest opponent available? Why so many excuses?
Spence, Crawford were nobodies? They were potentially going to rule for a long time once Floyd went. Berto certainly werent.
Floyd criticised enough, there was no reason to not fight them. Just begging for more critisicm.
You are one of these clowns that minimizes every win Floyd has, elevates every guy he didn't fight to HOF status even though their career doesn't warrant it, and contradicts themselves when trying to find something to criticize Floyd for.Comment
-
Floyd f ans are waste of energy. Fights berto and thinks that's ok. But not any pressure on Floyd to fight thurman, crawford, spence, who was reputedly said to have beat floyd up in sparring.
But now put pressure on Pac to fight them all. They never pressured floyd. It was they fought nobody they need to make their names by themselves?
Don't criticise them for calling out 4o year old. Floyd didn't need to challenge himself at 38 according to his fans but Pac does at 40?
I asked Floyd to fight Ggg at 160 if he didn't want to fight the top WWsLast edited by hugh grant; 02-04-2019, 02:30 PM.Comment
Comment