Bye Metho_4u you lost the bet time to leave

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Marchegiano
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Aug 2010
    • 12208
    • 1,790
    • 2,307
    • 165,288

    #21
    Originally posted by DaFan
    Why would a mod, admin, or the owners of this site want to exile anyone? I never understood that kind of request. It doesn't make sense at all. Instead, if I were them, I'd prohibit any bets on leaving the site, period. I'd make such a bet a bannable offense. Got it? Bad for business!

    Better not make such bets and, if you do, it's between the two of you (not addressing you, just in general). I've seen many of these bets go sour over the years. Bet real money!
    Same reason I can't call you ****-****ing palooka on a forum about a sport centralized around beating people into submission.

    I mean no offense or to actually call you a ****-****er, was for illustration only, but you get me right? I just noticed I left room for meaning to call you a palooka, hell son I only used that word 'cause I reckon it's funny.

    Why do mods have the power to ban anyone if it isn't for social construction? Clearly they have the power to ban people because they believe it behooves them to remove certain people.

    When you have a whole cackle of hens cluckin' up the hen house bubba it's time to bring in some **** Folks are complaining just like sallies who can't handle adult language complain. It's about time for some action now isn't it?

    I agree with most of what you said, but, they ban already. Folks don't have to argue in favor of the virtues of banning because they already ban. I'm not personally in favor of banning or ignoring, both are for wmournz, but they already do it so why not enforce bets?

    Comment

    • BoxingIsGreat
      The Champ
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Feb 2009
      • 19470
      • 1,684
      • 2,397
      • 1,062,888

      #22
      Originally posted by Marchegiano
      Same reason I can't call you ****-****ing palooka on a forum about a sport centralized around beating people into submission.

      I mean no offense or to actually call you a ****-****er, was for illustration only, but you get me right? I just noticed I left room for meaning to call you a palooka, hell son I only used that word 'cause I reckon it's funny.

      Why do mods have the power to ban anyone if it isn't for social construction? Clearly they have the power to ban people because they believe it behooves them to remove certain people.

      When you have a whole cackle of hens cluckin' up the hen house bubba it's time to bring in some **** Folks are complaining just like sallies who can't handle adult language complain. It's about time for some action now isn't it?

      I agree with most of what you said, but, they ban already. Folks don't have to argue in favor of the virtues of banning because they already ban. I'm not personally in favor of banning or ignoring, both are for wmournz, but they already do it so why not enforce bets?
      I didn't really understand the first few paragraphs at all.

      I know they ban people all the time. People who come to their attention for certain reason, not two guys trying to banish themselves from the site. It's totally different. The mods might not have any issues with either. Therefore, there's no reason to encourage any member from leaving the site.

      That's all, my friend!

      Comment

      Working...
      TOP