Who looks after their fighters better, Hearn or Warren?

[rickJen]

How come Warren can't even give Fury the home advantage?
He fought Klitschko in Germany.
The Fury Wilder 2 fight will again be in the US,
despite claiming Fury won the fight.

[pillowfists98]

Warren has been sued by many of his former fighters, Hearn has not. What does that tell you?

[Lopez_Boxing]

Maybe fury just isn't a diva and a warrior. He will fight any body any where

[rickJen]

Maybe fury just isn't a diva and a warrior. He will fight any body any where

Fury calls himself, "uneducated."
Warren may be taking advantage of this "uneducated" guy.

[rickJen]

Or maybe Warren just doesn't have the craftiness and ingenuity of Hearn.

[Motorcity Cobra]

I've never heard of Hearn having Bob Arum and Don King problems with his fighters. I will give him credit for that.

Sky Sports wouldn't let him get away with that type of behavior. It reflects badly on the company. Just like when Arum didn't pay Manny for his ESPN Plus fight Manny got paid out quickly. ESPN is not about to have **** like that going on. If Bob was still with HBO Manny would still be waiting on his money

[kafkod]

Warren has been sued by many of his former fighters, Hearn has not. What does that tell you?

Warren has also been shot in the head and almost killed by one his former fighters.

[rickJen]

I think Fury is not a worldly individual.

[Earl-Hickey]

Hearn

Warren REGULARLY is in court battles with fighters who leave him, he's been assaulted and shot by his fighters before. He writes scathing critiques of them in the national press.

Hearn I don't recall ever doing any of the above

[Lopez_Boxing]

Warren has been sued by many of his former fighters, Hearn has not. What does that tell you?

Well, Hearn has been compared to a slave master by wilder and broner. sooooooo there's that