Tweet
...every damn time. seems as if nothing positive is allowed to be said about a brit
so a 46-0 fighter in JOE CALZAGHE with 21 defences, unifying 3 belts, who beat lacy, roy jones, hopkins, kessler, eubank amongst others is now apparantly a 'fraud'. Even at the time he was active he wasnt rated, look at the old lacy/calzaghe media predictions, they just assumed lacy would walk right through him, they were picking him to stop him in 3 rounds ffs. But when joe wins every round it doesnt count, it must have been because lacy wasnt good, it wasnt a case of calzaghe being brilliant, no cause that means giving credit to joe. And beating hopkins and roy jones doesnt count because they were old, because joe was such a spring chicken at that age too wasnt he?
ANTHONY JOSHUA picks up 3 heavyweight belts in a short space of time consistently fighting top 5 opponents but 'hes third best in the division' and not a real champ. The real champ at the time was wilder because he beat one old fat old cuban who is heavily rumoured to be approaching 50 years old.
Then when you try to reason with these guys and say TYSON FURY would outbox wilder and deserve to win (as i predicted) you get laughed at. Again he never got credit for the wladimir fight, he apparently won because 'wlad never threw punches' as if he made the conscientious decision to go in there, not throw punches and lose.
When ward won his tournament he was p4p top 3. When usyk won his tournament hes p4p top 3. If inoue wins his i bet he'll be p4p top 3 (some people have him up there already). But when CALLUM SMITH wins his tournament, we dont count it. Hes not allowed to be called the top dog in his own division. Everyone says the UK dominated 168 line up was weak. What exactly was/is so amazing about that cruiserweight line up or the bantamweight one?
When leo santa cruz goes 1-1 with frampton he becomes number 1 in the division and goes on the p4p list. When JOSH WARRINGTON beats frampton even easier and beats unbeaten lee selby, hes talked about like hes some fringe level fighter and not even top 3 in his own damn division. Them wins are better than half the fighters on the p4p list have.
Then an outstanding amateur such as JOE JOYCE comes along after getting robbed in olympic finals, starts knocking everyone out as a pro and hes not even in contention for any prospect of the year awards and youve got posters on here calling him 'a big oaf' and 'the frankenstein monster', yet other prospects who have done nothing more in the pros and did a lot less in the amateurs are talked about as superstars.
why is this the case?
so a 46-0 fighter in JOE CALZAGHE with 21 defences, unifying 3 belts, who beat lacy, roy jones, hopkins, kessler, eubank amongst others is now apparantly a 'fraud'. Even at the time he was active he wasnt rated, look at the old lacy/calzaghe media predictions, they just assumed lacy would walk right through him, they were picking him to stop him in 3 rounds ffs. But when joe wins every round it doesnt count, it must have been because lacy wasnt good, it wasnt a case of calzaghe being brilliant, no cause that means giving credit to joe. And beating hopkins and roy jones doesnt count because they were old, because joe was such a spring chicken at that age too wasnt he?
ANTHONY JOSHUA picks up 3 heavyweight belts in a short space of time consistently fighting top 5 opponents but 'hes third best in the division' and not a real champ. The real champ at the time was wilder because he beat one old fat old cuban who is heavily rumoured to be approaching 50 years old.
Then when you try to reason with these guys and say TYSON FURY would outbox wilder and deserve to win (as i predicted) you get laughed at. Again he never got credit for the wladimir fight, he apparently won because 'wlad never threw punches' as if he made the conscientious decision to go in there, not throw punches and lose.
When ward won his tournament he was p4p top 3. When usyk won his tournament hes p4p top 3. If inoue wins his i bet he'll be p4p top 3 (some people have him up there already). But when CALLUM SMITH wins his tournament, we dont count it. Hes not allowed to be called the top dog in his own division. Everyone says the UK dominated 168 line up was weak. What exactly was/is so amazing about that cruiserweight line up or the bantamweight one?
When leo santa cruz goes 1-1 with frampton he becomes number 1 in the division and goes on the p4p list. When JOSH WARRINGTON beats frampton even easier and beats unbeaten lee selby, hes talked about like hes some fringe level fighter and not even top 3 in his own damn division. Them wins are better than half the fighters on the p4p list have.
Then an outstanding amateur such as JOE JOYCE comes along after getting robbed in olympic finals, starts knocking everyone out as a pro and hes not even in contention for any prospect of the year awards and youve got posters on here calling him 'a big oaf' and 'the frankenstein monster', yet other prospects who have done nothing more in the pros and did a lot less in the amateurs are talked about as superstars.
why is this the case?
You ****in' Sally that ya're 
Comment