Do you have to consider a fighter comparable to his most
successful peers in order to be able to respect him at all?
I afford a measure of respect to all fighter who put-on the
gloves and step into a ring to compete. You can argue that
Stiverne's performances have not met your prerequisite for
deserving respect, but Stiverne has competed at a higher
level and achieved more than most boxers could ever
realistically hope for. It's sad that the scope of your
respect doesn't reach beyond the pound-4-pound rankings.
successful peers in order to be able to respect him at all?
I afford a measure of respect to all fighter who put-on the
gloves and step into a ring to compete. You can argue that
Stiverne's performances have not met your prerequisite for
deserving respect, but Stiverne has competed at a higher
level and achieved more than most boxers could ever
realistically hope for. It's sad that the scope of your
respect doesn't reach beyond the pound-4-pound rankings.
Comment