Comments Thread For: Wilder-Fury Rematch Could Land on April 27 or May, Says Warren
Collapse
-
To be fair, he said he would be making those improved offers to Wilder and Fury.
He gave details of a 65-35 offer with a two way rematch. Wilder going to 30-70 in the US if he lost, or 50-50 in the US if he won.
Assuming the 60-40 offer has similar clauses, and the WBC would allow it at Wilder's request, it seems like a great deal.Comment
-
I believe what Hearn said was that he "can" offer 60-40 to Wilder. I also believe Hearn said that terms like the ones Toffee mentioned were "fair" and that he may finally reveal details of his unresponded to email at the end of the month.Comment
-
I shouldn't respond, because you clearly just get off on it, but he's fought Parker, Klitschko and Povetkin. Say what you like about them but they were all highly ranked at the time and two of those fights were to unify belts.
When you beat a highly ranked fighter, they move down the rankings. Doesn't mean they weren't highly rated at the time. That's what clearing out a division looks like.
Cleaning out a division is beating any and everyone who tries to stake a claim as the best in division. That means beating guys like Wilder, Fury, Miller, or Ortiz.Comment
-
Future #1
Looking forward to wilder vs fury II in my opinion the winner of which will be #1 in the division. I’m sure after 2 fights at this level for both is something they can take into a Joshua fight and will give them a slight edge.
It will interesting to see the revenue post fight to determine how much their stock is worth and compare that closely to AJ next bout and see who who. I have to say at present Joshua has the edge in revenue but that surely looks set to drop without fury/wilder if your a betting man.
The discussion of splits and offers from AJs camp seem to be curious as Frank Warren confirmed no such offer or contract or contact. If Eddie is serious I would have thought a quick chat with Frank would be the right move and in relation to wilder I believe they already set their standard from the outset of 50/50 and for Hearn to keep sending alleged upgraded offers is not the right move either. It does seem like Hearn is playing games here and the same can be said in reference to Whytes offer of a fixed fee perhaps he deserves better.
Hearn has clearly mismanaged AJ and now is in a very tight spot at the centre of it all is boxing and no one is interested in watching AJ vs punching bag.Comment
-
I'm saying that if you start claiming Robbie renaged on your bet, you won't sue him over it.
And we can make our bet using the same kind of "legally binding agreement" you think you made with Robbie.Comment
Comment