That’s part of the reason. Others are, there isn’t adequate access to representation, the evidence isn’t that solid, and to improve conviction rates and prosecution performance. In some states the prosecution doesn’t even have to share it’s evidence with the defence unless the case goes to trial. In which case would a miscarriage of justice be more likely...in that type of situation or a trial?
Anyway, you were implying that just because kovalev was accused and charged, that we should assume there’s solid evidence against him and that he’s probably guilty. You tried to bolster that argument by making an incorrect statement. If he’s guilty, then so be it, but I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s conveniently settled out of court tho.
Anyway, you were implying that just because kovalev was accused and charged, that we should assume there’s solid evidence against him and that he’s probably guilty. You tried to bolster that argument by making an incorrect statement. If he’s guilty, then so be it, but I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s conveniently settled out of court tho.
Comment