Comments Thread For: Canelo Alvarez vs. Daniel Jacobs Finalized For May 4

[NC Uppercut]

Wow!! Holy ish!!! I was so surprised to just read this! Exciting fight, Champ vs Champ, Conte vs Reynoso’s! Lol! Glad to see this was made and glad we don’t have to pay $100 dollars too! I was literally waiting for my subscription to come to my last day so I could cancel it..on second thought I’ll keep it now 😂

[Citizen Koba]

Nice damn fight. The best Canelo could have taken at 160.

[BOXING-SCRIBE]

Jacob is not one of the best middleweights of this era lol. Quoting the article. Good fight for Alavaroid

[methodcal]

That's exactly my point! But too many haters on here and that piece of shet " Dontaes Boxing Nation"
keep saying Canelo is afraid of black fighters.... They are fuccing pathetic!

Im black and Im a subscriber but you're totally correct.

[fernandtg]

Potential candidate for robbery of the year.

[Laligalaliga]

******? LOL, I'm not going to give you the time. You clearly have no idea what you are talking about if you think Wilder and Jacobs are on equal name value.

Lolx.... I beat you in your game.
Accept defeat and craw back to your shyyte hole

[whoseyourdaddy]

Where’s everybody that said he wouldn’t fight jacobs next? That it was gonna be lemuiex?

Do you mean TMT, Jab jab Goon, two swee hooks, razor??? etc well missing in action preparing their excuses as to why they were so wroooong yet again and ready to demean Jacobs accomplishments.

[lolpz]

Nobody edges out a close decision over Canelo. If it's a close fight, Canelo gets the nod. End of.

If it's clear enough, no judge will deny a fighter the victory, period.

There have been 2 close decisions in Canelo's career - The Lara fight and the first GGG fight. Both of those fights could've gone to Lara or GGG. Canelo got the nod in the Lara fight, and got a draw in the first GGG fight. Both were not bad decisions in my humble opinion. Although I disagree with the Lara one.

[aboutfkntime]

Lololololol off topic Wilder was offered 40%. What now? As your words were if the offer is 35% AJ is serious about the fight and Wilder should definitely take the fight. It is 5% more than we originally thought. I know you are a man of your word so there is no point me sending you your post to rejoin your memory. Your thoughts please in case they have changed and if they are too contradictory we will compare and contrast

thank you Noel

but apparently, I was wrong.....

I actually believed that the NEW offer from Hearn was legit

I know, I know..... fool me once, shame on you..... blah blah

it appears that Fast Eddie was talking shlt..... AGAIN !!


"Certainly not, we’ve never had that offer,” he told The Telegraph..... “No offer’s been sent to me. Hearn sent an offer to Tyson over the weekend but it certainly was not 60/40 and it was quite a derisory offer for Tyson..... “So that’s it. We haven’t even responded to it it was so derisory." ~ Frank Warren

https://www.boxingscene.com/warren-reacts-hearns-offer-claim-joshua-vs-fury--135452

I fell for it, despite knowing 100% that they have been avoiding Wilder up until this point..... and I believed that because..... 1) I did not think that Hearn was a Arum-level liar..... a common bullshlt-artist, sure..... but I did not think that Hearn would lie about you, while standing next to you, while looking you in the eye..... and, 2) because I really wanted that fight

oh well, back to the old drawing board

but you are correct..... 40% is a GOOD offer, one that Wilder (and Fury) should accept immediately if they really want that fight..... I would have stood by that comment if the offer had been legit, pity it wasn't

THAT, is why I wait and hear both sides

[aboutfkntime]

He did at times. But he still should have got at least a draw from it, which makes me sure that a prime GGG was a much better fighter than prime Canelo.

just the eye-test tells you that hes not

the result proved it

I don't know what you guys are watching sometimes