Comments Thread For: Canelo Alvarez vs. Daniel Jacobs Finalized For May 4
Collapse
-
-
Oscar set the venue 2 months ago, he said he had the T-Mobil Arena for a Canelo fight, he mention that on twitter.Comment
-
Comment
-
Hating on exactly what?
I'm talking about why Oscar last Saturday said he is giving marching orders to Gomez to make the GGG fight when all along they were trying to finalize the Jacobs fight.
Then I listed the two possible reasons for Oscar doing what he did.
So again, hating on exactly what?Comment
-
It's always good when a fight announcement pops up and takes you by surprise.
I wonder if Lem blowing his fight on Canelo/Fielding card moved this fight closer than planned. Either way it's a good one to look forward to.
I think Canelo will win. I see Glovkin as the only guy capable of beating Canelo in the division (I thought he did once, probably twice), but outside of a GGG fight, Jacobs is the best fight available. The 3rd best MW IMO. So it's good one for the division.
It's nice to get something fresh also.Comment
-
Now this frees up GGG vs. Charlo for the WBC Mando. Then Canelo can fight the winner in Sept.
But thats IF GGG will do the fight. My $$$$ is *** NO! He fight another bum!
Maybe we can have Vanes/GGG 2 on Cinco De Mayo also and they can call it Return of the Mexican style...I agree my bet is he continues using the "ima diva"excuse to duck Charlo. Hell likely face some tba & claim hewas ducked
1) the only judge who scored the first fight for Golovkin, awarded the rematch to Canelo
2) Abel Sanchez admitted that Golovkin did not win the rematch
3) MOST fighters/trainers/insiders say that Canelo won the rematch
4) no Golovkin fan can tell me which of the 4 official scoring criteria was edged by Golovkin
and yet..... ROBBERRRRRYYYYY !!!
casual fans are shltComment
-
thank you Noel
but apparently, I was wrong.....
I actually believed that the NEW offer from Hearn was legit
I know, I know..... fool me once, shame on you..... blah blah
it appears that Fast Eddie was talking shlt..... AGAIN !!
"Certainly not, we’ve never had that offer,” he told The Telegraph..... “No offer’s been sent to me. Hearn sent an offer to Tyson over the weekend but it certainly was not 60/40 and it was quite a derisory offer for Tyson..... “So that’s it. We haven’t even responded to it it was so derisory." ~ Frank Warren
Stay updated with the latest boxing news, fight results, interviews, and rankings. Get real-time coverage of upcoming bouts, analysis, and exclusive insights from the world of boxing.
I fell for it, despite knowing 100% that they have been avoiding Wilder up until this point..... and I believed that because..... 1) I did not think that Hearn was a Arum-level liar..... a common bullshlt-artist, sure..... but I did not think that Hearn would lie about you, while standing next to you, while looking you in the eye..... and, 2) because I really wanted that fight
oh well, back to the old drawing board
but you are correct..... 40% is a GOOD offer, one that Wilder (and Fury) should accept immediately if they really want that fight..... I would have stood by that comment if the offer had been legit, pity it wasn't
THAT, is why I wait and hear both sides
To busy showing off to the rest of your herd with smart arsed shit talk about GGG to concentrate on anything else, perhaps?Last edited by kafkod; 01-17-2019, 08:06 PM.Comment
-
it could be vs another user, but i think it was either you or turneup...Comment
Comment