Comments Thread For: Golden Boy Prez Not So Sure Golovkin Wants Canelo Trilogy

[Jab jab boom]

Yes he can be the best at beating Bums like the Wades, Geales, Stevens, Rosados, Monroes and Ishidas of the world LMFAO

wade> josesito Lopez, geale> angulo, Stevens > beefy Smith, rosado > khan, Monroe > Chavez jr, Ishida > Kirkland

[aboutfkntime]

I've spent the better part of the last 6 months embarrassing you on here every time you reply to my posts. I've never initiated convo with you but you seek me out. Mainly because your ego has been so damaged by me that you keep trying to come back, only to get embarrassed over and over again. You haven't disproved 1 single thing that I wrote. You tried to deflect but all you did was prove that you're outgunned. For the record, I never said canelo used to fight "studs" . He had a better mindset before but let's be real, he chased trout who has been proven to be an average gate keeper. He chased mayweather for the exposure and pay day and got schooled. Lara is really the only elite guy other than Floyd that he faced during his first 40 or so fights. Since then, a bunch of bums and old men. As far as proving he'd fight anyone, you say ggg has only fought bums. You've referred to him in only disparaging ways and as a hype job, yet in the same breath you say Canelo will fight anyone because he fought ggg. Which is it? Is it he hype job who fights bums or is he someone that proves Canelo will "fight anyone"?? Damn, I still wait for the day where I can actually encounter an intelligent Canelo fan. That day has yet to come.

nah, you haven't..... not once

you don't even talk a good game

once again, this is what you have admitted in this thread.....

1) Golovkin has a shltty resume'

2) at JMW, Canelo fought the best fighters available..... something that Golovkin has never done

3) I proved you wrong, by reminding you that Canelo just fought Golovkin TWICE

tell us again how shltty Golovkin's resume' is

[aboutfkntime]

The second fight GGG won 115-113. It was very close.

I want to hear you say GGG didn’t get robbed in the first fight. I want to hear you say it.

the first fight was no robbery

and the sole judge who awarded that fight to Golovkin, awarded the rematch to Canelo

[Jab jab boom]

nah, you haven't..... not once

you don't even talk a good game

once again, this is what you have admitted in this thread.....

1) Golovkin has a shltty resume'

2) at JMW, Canelo fought the best fighters available..... something that Golovkin has never done

3) I proved you wrong, by reminding you that Canelo just fought Golovkin TWICE

tell us again how shltty Golovkin's resume' is

your weak, false and off topic responses bore me. I no longer feel the need to continue this destruction and exposure of your ignorance. Since you already admitted to me that you're 65 yrs old, I'll chalk this up to you going senile and being off of your meds.

[Lomadeaux]

your weak, false and off topic responses bore me. I no longer feel the need to continue this destruction and exposure of your ignorance. Since you already admitted to me that you're 65 yrs old, I'll chalk this up to you going senile and being off of your meds.

.... there’s zero way he’s 65. Are you serious???

[aboutfkntime]

your weak, false and off topic responses bore me. I no longer feel the need to continue this destruction and exposure of your ignorance. Since you already admitted to me that you're 65 yrs old, I'll chalk this up to you going senile and being off of your meds.

son, YOU said Canelo has not fought a threat since 2014

I simply pointed out that you were talking bollocks !

you also said that Golovkin has a shltty resume'

which I do agree with

greenK

[aboutfkntime]

.... there’s zero way he’s 65. Are you serious???

he talks bollocks !

I told him I was 50, so he decided that meant 65

just like how he decided that a win for Canelo, is somehow a win for Golovkin loooool

and like how he decided that Canelo has not fought a threat since 2014, despite the fact that Canelo just fought Golovkin twice

he is a story-telling muppet

[Lomadeaux]

he talks bollocks !

I told him I was 50, so he decided that meant 65

just like how he decided that a win for Canelo, is somehow a win for Golovkin loooool

and like how he decided that Canelo has not fought a threat since 2014, despite the fact that Canelo just fought Golovkin twice

he is a story-telling muppet

Mayweather was his biggest threat. That was an embarrassing performance where a judge actually scored him a draw.

Lara beat him..

Some judges had him ahead in the Khan fight..

He got a horrible robbery draw against GGG in the first fight

And a present in the second.

GGG could once again throw more, land more and still lose the 3rd fight.

[Lomadeaux]

nah, you haven't..... not once

you don't even talk a good game

once again, this is what you have admitted in this thread.....

1) Golovkin has a shltty resume'

2) at JMW, Canelo fought the best fighters available..... something that Golovkin has never done

3) I proved you wrong, by reminding you that Canelo just fought Golovkin TWICE

tell us again how shltty Golovkin's resume' is

You've been embarrassing yourself for a while man. You can not be trusted with your views/opinions. There's no integrity there. I'm just shooting it straight with you. You need to calm down.

[Bjl12]

I mean, I could find hundreds of jabs landed on Canelo's face by GGG but... what's the point?

He's literally landed hundreds... 226 to be exact.

Right and those were PITTER PATTER jabs.

Picture evidence shows those Jabs did ZERO dmg and Canelo has been bruised before (floyd and lara)...and Floyd is a small or medium WW at 35..not a natural MW.

People dont deny Gennady having a good jab. The issue is when CUCKS (like YOU) label that jab a "piston of a jab". Has me ctfu