Comments Thread For: Canelo vs. Golovkin Trilogy Targeted For May 4, Says De La Hoya

[Mindgames]

then why do you keep repeating the same ****** things ?





hoards of dopey golov-tards were saying that

guys like you

they ran around saying that, and a whole lot of other rubbish..... until Canelo slapped the bullshlt from your mouths





yea, he did

1) he made a bunch of silly excuses to avoid Sergio Mora in a showcase on HBO, preferring instead to fight a NO-HOPER in Monaco on free-TV

Mora was an ex-champ who had clearly faded, which is the ideal opponent for a young fighter attempting to establish himself on the world-stage..... boxing has always worked that way.....

NOT saying that Golovkin could not have beaten Mora, just that the Latin Snake is a known mover/spoiler who is notoriously difficult to look good against..... and they were not willing to risk failing to put Mora away, looking bad in the process, or..... worse

when I heard Loeffler stuttering and stammering his way through half-a-dozen silly excuses, I knew what was up..... that was ridiculous..... because insisting that someone is irrelevant, and not a draw..... only works if you fight someone relevant who IS a draw..... not an unknown NO-HOPER on free TV who is WORSE

missing opportunities like that, and with guys like Cotto..... is why Golovkin only has 97k fans..... he needed those type of fights

2) they did the exact same thing to Lara and Ward, who are both also known mover/spoilers who are notoriously difficult to look good against.....

Lara would have been Golovkin's best opponent to date at that point..... and once again, insisting that someone is irrelevant, and not a draw..... only works if you fight someone relevant who IS a draw..... not guys like Willie Monroe, Wade, Brook, etc.....

3) Ward..... they promised to fight Ward at 168..... a) they killed the fight in June 2015 by demanding a catchweight they knew would kill the fight..... b) in September 2015 they refused that fight in 36 minutes flat

4) the superstar Cotto, should have been the ultimate goal of every fighter from 140-160..... at that point in time, Cotto was the very best option, because May/Pac were totally unrealistic and never going to happen

Mr " anyone from 154-168 " totally refusing to negotiate on weight with the little old faded SUPERSTAR Miguel Cotto..... is the 2nd most bizarre occurrence within boxing that I have witnessed within the last decade

I cannot believe how little was spoken about that situation, both from the media and from the fans..... totally bizarre..... every other fighter from 140-160 would have cut off one of his fingers for that fight, and yet Golovkin would not so much as lift his little finger to make that fight, totally refusing to drop a single pound to fight the 153lb superstar

then a few months after refusing to negotiate on weight with Cotto and Canelo..... Golovkin threw up his hands in frustration and claimed that he was willing and able to fight at 154 but nobody would step up..... WTF???

those are the exact type of fights that Golovkin should have taken

5) they specifically promised to fight Canelo at 154..... but as above, when shht got real they tucked tail and ran from that fight..... and just like above, 6 months after refusing to negotiate on weight with Cotto and Canelo, Golovkin threw up his hands in frustration and claimed that he was willing and able to fight at 154, but nobody would step up.....



6) Derevyanchenko - and Golovkin got stripped

7) Saunders..... why the fcuk would Golovkin select a total NO-HOPER in Vanes, when Saunders was running around with his "dream"..... calling him Pvssy-Borat.,.... and offering to fight him in June???

a unification > a mando, so Golovkin would not have been stripped for refusing to fight Derevyanchenko..... instead, Golovkin avoided TWO threats, selected an inactive JMW, and got stripped for his troubles in the process.....

the very second that Saunders said he was available, there was no other fight to make..... Munguia, Spike, and Vanes..... should never have been mentioned

..... come on, that is the 3rd most bizarre situation within the sport of boxing that I have ever witnessed..... two of those situations being created by Golovkin

8) Charlo - the WBC GUARANTEED the winner a shot at Canelo

9) the Canelo trilogy fight - to win back his titles

if you think all of that happened by coincidence, you are a fkn dreamer

stop licking Golovkin's sack and then expecting old school fans to applaud you for it..... MANY established journalists have said the exact same thing..... which is why you should have smartened up

Everything you wrote there you already wrote before, although you have added a few new gay sex references, which are a dead giveaway id say. Rarely has a mans obsession about another man been displayed with such commitment. Well done you lol I dont know why youd be talking to me about the best since Hagler thing, since ive never said it, ive reiterated ive never said it, yet you're still ****ing on about it to me despite it having nothing to do with me at all. Are you mental? Lol.. Im glad you finally mentioned Saunders, who did call Golovkin bad names, but also, not so long ago, said Golovkin would beat him and Eubank jnr on the same night. He also said he saw Canelo lose the first fight like everyone else non biased. Trouble with Billy, is he tends to pull out at the last minute, or fail drug tests causing postponements, like Canelo did.. Your not an old school fan, ive boxed amateur, met alot of people in the business and know alot of fans, none of them talk like you. Your more like a reality tv fan to me. Kinda hysterical and ovedramatic, and unable to stay on any subject apart from your obsession. I wasnt always too happy with Golovkins opponents, but now the guys your a fan of are fighting the same exact guys he did. And in Billys case, making harder work of them, years later.But guess what, at the end of it all, Andrade has Billys title, and him and Canelo are still drug cheats that surrendered their titles without a fight, and feast on ex Golovkin victims... And Canelos still not a puncher 😂

[aboutfkntime]

Everything you wrote there you already wrote before, although you have added a few new gay sex references, which are a dead giveaway id say. Rarely has a mans obsession about another man been displayed with such commitment. Well done you lol I dont know why youd be talking to me about the best since Hagler thing, since ive never said it, ive reiterated ive never said it, yet you're still ****ing on about it to me despite it having nothing to do with me at all. Are you mental? Lol.. Im glad you finally mentioned Saunders, who did call Golovkin bad names, but also, not so long ago, said Golovkin would beat him and Eubank jnr on the same night. He also said he saw Canelo lose the first fight like everyone else non biased. Trouble with Billy, is he tends to pull out at the last minute, or fail drug tests causing postponements, like Canelo did.. Your not an old school fan, ive boxed amateur, met alot of people in the business and know alot of fans, none of them talk like you. Your more like a reality tv fan to me. Kinda hysterical and ovedramatic, and unable to stay on any subject apart from your obsession. I wasnt always too happy with Golovkins opponents, but now the guys your a fan of are fighting the same exact guys he did. And in Billys case, making harder work of them, years later.But guess what, at the end of it all, Andrade has Billys title, and him and Canelo are still drug cheats that surrendered their titles without a fight, and feast on ex Golovkin victims... And Canelos still not a puncher 😂

wow, that was a huge wall of crybaby txt..... and yet, you did not attempt to address any of those golov-ducks

if you don't want to debate, go elsewhere to cry

#embarrassing

[aboutfkntime]

Everything you wrote there you already wrote before, although you have added a few new gay sex references, which are a dead giveaway id say. Rarely has a mans obsession about another man been displayed with such commitment. Well done you lol I dont know why youd be talking to me about the best since Hagler thing, since ive never said it, ive reiterated ive never said it, yet you're still ****ing on about it to me despite it having nothing to do with me at all. Are you mental? Lol.. Im glad you finally mentioned Saunders, who did call Golovkin bad names, but also, not so long ago, said Golovkin would beat him and Eubank jnr on the same night. He also said he saw Canelo lose the first fight like everyone else non biased. Trouble with Billy, is he tends to pull out at the last minute, or fail drug tests causing postponements, like Canelo did.. Your not an old school fan, ive boxed amateur, met alot of people in the business and know alot of fans, none of them talk like you. Your more like a reality tv fan to me. Kinda hysterical and ovedramatic, and unable to stay on any subject apart from your obsession. I wasnt always too happy with Golovkins opponents, but now the guys your a fan of are fighting the same exact guys he did. And in Billys case, making harder work of them, years later.But guess what, at the end of it all, Andrade has Billys title, and him and Canelo are still drug cheats that surrendered their titles without a fight, and feast on ex Golovkin victims... And Canelos still not a puncher 😂

1) who gives a shlt if Canelo is a puncher or not lol
stop your obsession with powah-doe, you dumb casual

who fkn cares ?


2) using YOUR justification, Golovkin is not a puncher either


3) YDKSAB clown, you are typical casual-fan who over-rates power


4) YDKSAB clown, if you do not think that Canelo is a puncher

he is the very dictionary definition of a boxer/puncher

fcuk you g-tards whine about rubbish


5) the reason why Canelo turned Timidkin into a good boy..... is plainly obvious


did this post fcuk up your couch psycho-analysis even more than my post about Billy-Joe Steroid ?


Canelo beat the Mexican out of your boy..... it is aboutfkntime you stop sulking and deal with it lmao

[aboutfkntime]

Everything you wrote there you already wrote before, although you have added a few new gay sex references, which are a dead giveaway id say. Rarely has a mans obsession about another man been displayed with such commitment. Well done you lol I dont know why youd be talking to me about the best since Hagler thing, since ive never said it, ive reiterated ive never said it, yet you're still ****ing on about it to me despite it having nothing to do with me at all. Are you mental? Lol.. Im glad you finally mentioned Saunders, who did call Golovkin bad names, but also, not so long ago, said Golovkin would beat him and Eubank jnr on the same night. He also said he saw Canelo lose the first fight like everyone else non biased. Trouble with Billy, is he tends to pull out at the last minute, or fail drug tests causing postponements, like Canelo did.. Your not an old school fan, ive boxed amateur, met alot of people in the business and know alot of fans, none of them talk like you. Your more like a reality tv fan to me. Kinda hysterical and ovedramatic, and unable to stay on any subject apart from your obsession. I wasnt always too happy with Golovkins opponents, but now the guys your a fan of are fighting the same exact guys he did. And in Billys case, making harder work of them, years later.But guess what, at the end of it all, Andrade has Billys title, and him and Canelo are still drug cheats that surrendered their titles without a fight, and feast on ex Golovkin victims... And Canelos still not a puncher 😂

I would just about bet my left testicle that Manny Pacquiao is your favourite fighter

[Mindgames]

I would just about bet my left testicle that Manny Pacquiao is your favourite fighter

Why bet something that you dont have? Lol.. You're the laughing stock of the site. But i dont mind, we all need a friend and you dont get out much do you? 😂

[aboutfkntime]

Why bet something that you dont have? Lol.. You're the laughing stock of the site. But i dont mind, we all need a friend and you dont get out much do you? 😂

we get it, you are heartbroken

most likely one of the......
Pac > Matthyse > Kovalev > Golovkin, krewe

LOSER

that will be why you can't stop wanking on about powah-doe

don't cry diddums, you will learn the sport and get a clue one day

or not

[Mindgames]

we get it, you are heartbroken

most likely one of the......
Pac > Matthyse > Kovalev > Golovkin, krewe

LOSER

that will be why you can't stop wanking on about powah-doe

don't cry diddums, you will learn the sport and get a clue one day

or not

Canelo still aint a puncher, Andrade still took Billys title without a fight, and youve still never had the confidence to do anything with your hands other than type comedy and play with yourself. But its flattering to have a stalker 😂

[aboutfkntime]

Canelo still aint a puncher, Andrade still took Billys title without a fight, and youve still never had the confidence to do anything with your hands other than type comedy and play with yourself. But its flattering to have a stalker 😂

you wouldn't have a clue kid

my first fight was back in 1977

stop projecting yourself, casual

I would just about bet my life you are a pacfan

Pac > Matthyse > Kovalev > Golovkin > crybaby.....
..... that is right, huh?

LOSER !!

[Mindgames]

you wouldn't have a clue kid

my first fight was back in 1977

stop projecting yourself, casual

I would just about bet my life you are a pacfan

Pac > Matthyse > Kovalev > Golovkin > crybaby.....
..... that is right, huh?

LOSER !!

I wasnt talking about the playground mate. 😂 Never heard any fighter or trainer talk the way you do. All the childish names and gay references, it dont add up. You are a grade A obsessive and a pretty good stalker though.Never married hey? 😂

[aboutfkntime]

I wasnt talking about the playground mate. 😂 Never heard any fighter or trainer talk the way you do. All the childish names and gay references, it dont add up. You are a grade A obsessive and a pretty good stalker though.Never married hey? 😂

what gay references are those kid ?

people see what they want to see..... straighten yourself up

Pac > Matthyse > Kovalev > Golovkin > crybaby.....

..... that is right, huh?