Comments Thread For: Canelo vs. Golovkin Trilogy Targeted For May 4, Says De La Hoya

[SHOOTALLCLOWNS]

this coke addicted cross dressing freak was bullsh!!!ting as usual. never believe a junkie LOL! shame on you oscar.

[aboutfkntime]

Your obviously a bit of an insider lol Oscar is unreasonable, we know that, hes already been talking about how everyone has to take what he gives them, as if it was ever any different. Ive no doubt we'll get fight three, but tbh wouldn't you like to see both fight other people next, theres plenty of good middles. I just wonder why your not more worried about Saunders, being your Billys fan, and when hes going to try to get hes title back? I mean, you talk about Golovkin having a bad opponent next, but did you miss fat Billy against the worn out Adamu? Whens he fighting Andrade? Can he be relied on to actually turn up? He pulls out all the time, cheats for hes big fight. Why aren't you more worried about him? 😂

who cares about Billy-Joe Steroids

I know you don't

you are a golov-fan

so, yea..... dunno why you keep changing the subject to Billy-Joe Steroids, and I don't know why you keep changing the subject to Clenelo..... because the subject is Golovkin, and why he is ducking a Canelo-trilogy fight

it looks like somebody doesn't want to get his shlt pushed in

again !!

this post confused you, huh ?

[Mindgames]

who cares about Billy-Joe Steroids

I know you don't

you are a golov-fan

so, yea..... dunno why you keep changing the subject to Billy-Joe Steroids, and I don't know why you keep changing the subject to Clenelo..... because the subject is Golovkin, and why he is ducking a Canelo-trilogy fight

it looks like somebody doesn't want to get his shlt pushed in

again !!

this post confused you, huh ?

I think you're the one whos confused old fella. My post was in reference to Canelos overated power, and how hes next fight is always going to be a "devastating knockout" but against world level guys who aren't fragile, never is. You replied to me and then went groundhog day, never managing to refute my statement. I know your mad about Billy, i know how much you admired him and now you project lack of confidence away from the guy who needed drugs to nearly face Andrade. Deflect away, but we all know.. ��

[aboutfkntime]

I think you're the one whos confused old fella. My post was in reference to Canelos overated power, and how hes next fight is always going to be a "devastating knockout" but against world level guys who aren't fragile, never is. You replied to me and then went groundhog day, never managing to refute my statement. I know your mad about Billy, i know how much you admired him and now you project lack of confidence away from the guy who needed drugs to nearly face Andrade. Deflect away, but we all know.. ��

and I pointed that that Jabkin is exactly the same

they ran around for years saying that nobody at 160 can go 12 with Golovkin

we knew that was bullshlt, but you casuals believed it

that is why he avoided so many threats

[Mammoth]

Rehydration clause.... ****ing gay.....

[TonyGe]

if that did not happen, Team Bullshlt would clarify immediately

* crickets *

there is no reason whatsoever to assume he is lying

Golovkin is not longer with Tom so exactly what team are you referring to?

[Mindgames]

and I pointed that that Jabkin is exactly the same

they ran around for years saying that nobody at 160 can go 12 with Golovkin

we knew that was bullshlt, but you casuals believed it

that is why he avoided so many threats

You got no idea what i believe. In fact, i seem to remember saying that i thought Jacobs could extend Golovkin. But of course, you bunch everyone who doesnt share your exact opinions together lol Id say he fought some of these threats. He beat Danny, and in most peoples opinion beat Canelo the first time. Sure, hes not unbeatable, or lived up to the hype he arrived to, but most fighters dont. I recognise this, but you dont actually read what i write do you mate? Lol But, again, i was talking about Canelos power. He doesn't stop old welters. Golovkin has. He doesn't stop anyone at middle. Golovkin has. He has failed a drug test, and so has Saunders. To me that's more disappointing than missing certain fighters. Just saying.

[aboutfkntime]

You got no idea what i believe. In fact, i seem to remember saying that i thought Jacobs could extend Golovkin. But of course, you bunch everyone who doesnt share your exact opinions together lol Id say he fought some of these threats. He beat Danny, and in most peoples opinion beat Canelo the first time. Sure, hes not unbeatable, or lived up to the hype he arrived to, but most fighters dont......

you finally said something I agree with

further on that.....

I have never known a fighter to fall so far short of his OWN hype

this is the guy who would fight " anyone from 154-168 "

and yet, he killed THREE HUGE fights over weight

this is the guy who was the best middleweight since Hagler LMAO

and yet, he refused to lift his finger to make meaningful fights, even with superstars..... and he avoided mover/spoilers like the plague

" fell short " is an understatement

..... I recognise this, but you dont actually read what i write do you mate? Lol But, again, i was talking about Canelos power. He doesn't stop old welters. Golovkin has. He doesn't stop anyone at middle. Golovkin has. He has failed a drug test, and so has Saunders. To me that's more disappointing than missing certain fighters. Just saying.

Golovkin did not " miss " certain fighters, fanboy.....

..... Golovkin " ducked " certain fighters

BIG diff there

#notaboutthatlife

[Mindgames]

you finally said something I agree with

further on that.....

I have never known a fighter to fall so far short of his OWN hype

this is the guy who would fight " anyone from 154-168 "

and yet, he killed THREE HUGE fights over weight

this is the guy who was the best middleweight since Hagler LMAO

and yet, he refused to lift his finger to make meaningful fights, even with superstars..... and he avoided mover/spoilers like the plague

" fell short " is an understatement








Golovkin did not " miss " certain fighters, fanboy.....

..... Golovkin " ducked " certain fighters

BIG diff there

#notaboutthatlife

But weve already had this exact convo more than once, and i said loads of things you agreed with, but its like the men in black pop round to you and wipe your little memory. Who said Golovkin was the best since Hagler? Id say theres been alot since Hagler, Nunn, Toney, Jones ect. No, Rid**** Bowe ducked Lewis, Canelo ducked Golovkin, because both gave up their titles. Golovkin didnt duck anyone, he didn't make fights out of hes weight division, like Hagler, who didnt fight Spinks or Qawi. Billy Joe ducked Andrade, because he cheated and relinquished hes own title. The problem you have, is you got no clue that you repeat yourself constantly, as do i on repeating to you, you cant tell a fighter their not about that life, when you couldn't take a slap from any of them and have achieved nothing in boxing, other than become abit of a joke on a website now. You do know that, dontcha? ��

[aboutfkntime]

But weve already had this exact convo more than once, and i said loads of things you agreed with, but its like the men in black pop round to you and wipe your little memory.

then why do you keep repeating the same ****** things ?

Who said Golovkin was the best since Hagler? Id say theres been alot since Hagler, Nunn, Toney, Jones ect. No, Rid**** Bowe ducked Lewis, Canelo ducked Golovkin, because both gave up their titles.

hoards of dopey golov-tards were saying that

guys like you

they ran around saying that, and a whole lot of other rubbish..... until Canelo slapped the bullshlt from your mouths

Golovkin didnt duck anyone, he didn't make fights out of hes weight division, like Hagler, who didnt fight Spinks or Qawi. Billy Joe ducked Andrade, because he cheated and relinquished hes own title. The problem you have, is you got no clue that you repeat yourself constantly, as do i on repeating to you, you cant tell a fighter their not about that life, when you couldn't take a slap from any of them and have achieved nothing in boxing, other than become abit of a joke on a website now. You do know that, dontcha? ��

yea, he did

1) he made a bunch of silly excuses to avoid Sergio Mora in a showcase on HBO, preferring instead to fight a NO-HOPER in Monaco on free-TV

Mora was an ex-champ who had clearly faded, which is the ideal opponent for a young fighter attempting to establish himself on the world-stage..... boxing has always worked that way.....

NOT saying that Golovkin could not have beaten Mora, just that the Latin Snake is a known mover/spoiler who is notoriously difficult to look good against..... and they were not willing to risk failing to put Mora away, looking bad in the process, or..... worse

when I heard Loeffler stuttering and stammering his way through half-a-dozen silly excuses, I knew what was up..... that was ridiculous..... because insisting that someone is irrelevant, and not a draw..... only works if you fight someone relevant who IS a draw..... not an unknown NO-HOPER on free TV who is WORSE

missing opportunities like that, and with guys like Cotto..... is why Golovkin only has 97k fans..... he needed those type of fights

2) they did the exact same thing to Lara and Ward, who are both also known mover/spoilers who are notoriously difficult to look good against.....

Lara would have been Golovkin's best opponent to date at that point..... and once again, insisting that someone is irrelevant, and not a draw..... only works if you fight someone relevant who IS a draw..... not guys like Willie Monroe, Wade, Brook, etc.....

3) Ward..... they promised to fight Ward at 168..... a) they killed the fight in June 2015 by demanding a catchweight they knew would kill the fight..... b) in September 2015 they refused that fight in 36 minutes flat

4) the superstar Cotto, should have been the ultimate goal of every fighter from 140-160..... at that point in time, Cotto was the very best option, because May/Pac were totally unrealistic and never going to happen

Mr " anyone from 154-168 " totally refusing to negotiate on weight with the little old faded SUPERSTAR Miguel Cotto..... is the 2nd most bizarre occurrence within boxing that I have witnessed within the last decade

I cannot believe how little was spoken about that situation, both from the media and from the fans..... totally bizarre..... every other fighter from 140-160 would have cut off one of his fingers for that fight, and yet Golovkin would not so much as lift his little finger to make that fight, totally refusing to drop a single pound to fight the 153lb superstar

then a few months after refusing to negotiate on weight with Cotto and Canelo..... Golovkin threw up his hands in frustration and claimed that he was willing and able to fight at 154 but nobody would step up..... WTF???

those are the exact type of fights that Golovkin should have taken

5) they specifically promised to fight Canelo at 154..... but as above, when shht got real they tucked tail and ran from that fight..... and just like above, 6 months after refusing to negotiate on weight with Cotto and Canelo, Golovkin threw up his hands in frustration and claimed that he was willing and able to fight at 154, but nobody would step up.....



6) Derevyanchenko - and Golovkin got stripped

7) Saunders..... why the fcuk would Golovkin select a total NO-HOPER in Vanes, when Saunders was running around with his "dream"..... calling him Pvssy-Borat.,.... and offering to fight him in June???

a unification > a mando, so Golovkin would not have been stripped for refusing to fight Derevyanchenko..... instead, Golovkin avoided TWO threats, selected an inactive JMW, and got stripped for his troubles in the process.....

the very second that Saunders said he was available, there was no other fight to make..... Munguia, Spike, and Vanes..... should never have been mentioned

..... come on, that is the 3rd most bizarre situation within the sport of boxing that I have ever witnessed..... two of those situations being created by Golovkin

8) Charlo - the WBC GUARANTEED the winner a shot at Canelo

9) the Canelo trilogy fight - to win back his titles

if you think all of that happened by coincidence, you are a fkn dreamer

stop licking Golovkin's sack and then expecting old school fans to applaud you for it..... MANY established journalists have said the exact same thing..... which is why you should have smartened up