Comments Thread For: Canelo vs. Golovkin Trilogy Targeted For May 4, Says De La Hoya

[aboutfkntime]

No he didn't, and you know darn well he didn't. He proved he was his equal, and they had two close, intriguing fights. Any other perspective is just grandstanding for whichever one of them you like vs whoever you don't.

You can argue that the judges know what they are doing all you like, but history proves otherwise, and not just in this fight.

I'm a boxing fan - not a Golovkin/Canelo fan, and the two delivered a couple of the best fights in recent years - that's all.

Your anti-Golovkin rants are getting old and contrived. We get it - you don't like him, and you'll never tire of telling everyone, but it ignores the reality that these two haven't yet shown who is the better of the two.

And yes, I think Canelo wins the third convincingly - but that doesn't make me a fanboy of his, I just think he's improving while Golovkin is on the slide, and the third fight will show it, giving Canelo a clear edge.

completely disagree

not only did Canelo prove that he is a better fighter, he proved that he can beat Golovkin any way he wants

Canelo is more skilled, and more well-rounded, than Golovkin

[aboutfkntime]

All you have to do is tell me who Canelo has knocked out in recent years who wasnt fragile. He doesn't stop top men, even most of the natural welters.Not a puncher, and no amount of hate can turn him into one my old pal. 😂

neither does Golovkin

there is a reason why Golovkin was unwilling to stand there and trade with Canelo, after talking all that Mexican Warrior rubbish

there is a reason why Golovkin was unable to commit to the body and why he backed up and seemed timid at times

Canelo is not one-punching guys, but he had plenty enough on his shots to put Golovkin on his bike

[aboutfkntime]

Lol OK Mr Beta's...this coming from a guy who doesn't even know 5th grade grammar rules, why should anyone think you are smart enough to have an informed opinion about anything? And you have the nerve to call other people special lol. From reading your posts it is clear your IQ is legitimately probably near 80 or less. Look up what people in that range are called.

Btw - obviously a guy can still clearly win a fight without completely dominating every second of the fight. The loser can have good moments too. GGG won 8-3-1 in punch stats in fight 2 so saying he won, or even clearly won, would be backed up by the punch stats.

I agree with the bold, the rest is rubbish

Canelo bought the fight to Golovkin, but Golovkin backed up

even Abel Sanchez admitted that Golovkin did not win

we all saw that Canelo is more skilled and more well-rounded

[Sugar Adam Ali]

I honestly got no interest in old slow ggg getting beat by an even wider margin

[aboutfkntime]

Thanks. I like the way the articles are displayed and there are some good, informed posters on here. But yeah there are unfortunately a lot of low IQ haters on here too who are given too much of a voice. The over the top hate for GGG is really absurd considering all he has accomplished.

just what has he " accomplished ", fanboy ?

here, I will show you.....
Jacobs *
Canelo *
Lemieux

you could write those accomplishments on the back of a postage stamp

I hope you are right about fight 3! I think Canelo improved more than GGG in fight 2 though so not sure how the 3rd one will go. Just hope it is a good one and both guys stay healthy.

well you were wrong the first two times, I guess this will be #3

[strykr619]

Who cares at this point, GGG doesn't listen to his trainer/coach anyways and Canelo by now has him timed to a T.

GGG suffers another easy L at this point (I hate saying this as a GGG fan but nothing shows me otherwise at this point).

[MPDKSAB]

What does the MP stand for?

Most people

Who do you have as the best?

It's probably controversial but Demetrius Andrade. I just believe he hasn't had a chance to prove it.

What are your rankings at 160?

This post & your question could be a thread in itself. Maybe it should be 🤔

Demetrius Andrade
Daniel Jacobs
Jermall Charlo
GGG
Canelo
BJS

Derevyanchenko, Korobov

To be fair & clear tho I never seen Murata fight & the only time I saw Brant was when he was at 168. They probably fill out the top 10, I'm kinda confident that's the top 6 tho regardless of order. But that is how I particularly have it. It's tricky tho cause I also feel there may be no actual best. Which is why I think it's the best division right now. I think depending on the match up (the top 6) & when they fight a lot of these guys can beat each other.

For instance I feel GGG beat Canelo twice. But Canelo's the champ.. & although GGG won the 2nd fight I do feel he lost a step & took a lot of punishment & he's 36, so I favor Canelo to officially beat him in the 3rd fight if they fight.

I feel Jacobs beat GGG in their fight.

I feel Charlo would beat GGG cause again he's older & took a lot of punishment.

Charlo would've beat the Canelo that fought against GGG1 but Canelo in the* 2nd fight made the Charlo fight closer imo. Still favor Charlo.

I don't think BJS will beat any of them. Maybe, maybe Charlo.

& lastly I always felt Andrade's boxing ability was better than everyone's in an around his weight I don't think he'll lose a bout unless it's a robbery, includes KD's, or a KO.

Then the two who are the best should fight each other don't you think? If you don't think either of them are the best at 160 then that should be great news for you.

Yea but not really, for multiple reasons. I really like Andrade & Jacobs I don't want them to fight 😢😂. I would like them to fight everybody else 1st then meet up if they win. Also I feel like they're holding up the division (Canelo, GGG). It's time for other guys to have a shot & have a chance to make big money. I get it, its business but the fans will keep saying Andrade, Charlo have fought no one but keep making excuses for them not to fight the "names" in addition to the politics.

[Lefty0616]

For money purposes it makes perfect sense to stage this fight around Cinco De Mayo. I'd watch it despite folks saying GGG is older and slower. He'll put on a great show along with Canelo. However, the winner of this needs to give Jacobs his due.

[Death_Adder]

oh the stacking method of wrapping your hands. That's right! Wait wasn't that the same thing that Canelo was forced to re wrap his hands for a few weeks ago at msg? The form of wrapping hands that's legal in Vegas but not in NY. True. But yeah, overall, I'd prefer to have 1 controversial win on my record than 3, not to mention 5 super shady scorecards. I'd also prefer to have wins over young undefeated talent such as a vargas, Reid, oba carr, Campas, than all of my big wins being either controversial or vs guys in their late 30s. Oh, and since we were on the topic of cheating, I'd definitely prefer not to have 2 positive ped tests on my legacy either.

Canelo's wins already eclipse anything Cheato did his entire career.

Vargas, not a HOF fighter, average. Cheato needed nut shots to turn the tide of the fight to beat him
Reid, blind, had 14 wins
Oba Who? Gtfo
Campas, give me a fücking break

Canelo's wind over Lara and Trout trump those, easily.

Cheatos two big wins were against a 70 year old past his prime Whittaker and a robbery vs Oscar. Beating GGG is better than that, because there are people out there that think Canelo won. Nobody thinks Cheato beat Oscar.

Cheato ducked a prime Whittaker, Ike Quartay and Shane Mosley. Canelo hasn't ducked anyone

Embarrassed by Hopkins and Wright. Canelo lost to Mayeather, sure, but didn't get beat into retirement like Cheato, he came back better.

Those are FACTS.

The controversial score cards you claim Canelo has are your opinions.

The 2 ped tests won't hurt anything, it was very miniscule and has passed every test since.

[Boxing-1013]

just what has he " accomplished ", fanboy ?

Cool man. Really not even trying to be rude to you, but it is clear from your posts that you are a very low IQ self-hating person. I sincerely hope you get some help. This is what you do -

1) say really ****** stuff
2) call other people ****** when their points conflict with your low IQ biased analysis
3) you get called out for your poor grammar and spelling (******ity), and get asked why anyone should take such a simpleton seriously, who can't even spell or write past a 5th grade level?
4) you act like it's cool to be ******
5) repeat

It's just tiresome. You are just a complete waste of space. You bring no value to any area of life or conversation on here.

GGG is an ATG amateur, numerous awards, only a few losses, silver medal at the Olympics. As a pro, one of the highest KO percentages in MW history, one of longest reigning middleweight champs in history, fights people without regard for where the fight is, because he knows he is often good enough to finish the fight, and if not he will still clearly win.

15 good-great clear wins at MW on his resume. Should already be regarded as the greatest MW champ in history but because he is some random Asian/white dude from Kazakhstan who barely speaks English he gets nowhere near the credit he deserves.

The fact that you don't put Murray as one of his top 3 wins shows you have no idea what you're talking about. But then again you show that all the time. Your IQ is roughly 80. You are borderline ******ed. I am not saying this to be mean, just letting you know that no one with any sense cares at all about what you say. Read a book, try and better yourself. Please use bias and biased in a sentence correctly before you respond to me again, Mr Beta's.