Comments Thread For: Canelo vs. Golovkin Trilogy Targeted For May 4, Says De La Hoya

[whoseyourdaddy]

his trainer said he thought it was a draw. Not that he lost. Nothing that comes out of your **** gobbling mouth is accurate.

Not true you’re wrong, right after the fight he went to ESPN deportes with Bernardo Ozana, Julio Cesar Chavez Sr. And the biggest Canelo’s hater David Faitelson who tried for the whole hour they interviewed Abel to admit that they got screwed on the decision Abel rebuked him at least 5 times saying canelo won fair and square, and they should give props to Canelo for such a great performance. So please stop reaching.

[Nightfall]

Daznelo loves fighting them slow ass punching bags. Next 🍒 pick is Lemieux for September.

[whoseyourdaddy]

nope, you're off by close to 300 punches and still doesn't change the fact that ggg outlanded him in 18 of 24 rounds.

Yes but he outlanded with mainly jabs, while canelo out landed GGG in power punches in both fights. Since when a jab is the determining factor for the outcome of a fight? Never mind it is only when it fits your agenda.

[Jab jab boom]

Well, when he wasn't getting thoroughly outboxed by better boxers, he was KOing one eyed fighters, extremely young fighters and bums with his loaded gloves.

So you're right, one controversial win with paid off judges, the rest, he was cheating his way to wins with other means.

oh the stacking method of wrapping your hands. That's right! Wait wasn't that the same thing that Canelo was forced to re wrap his hands for a few weeks ago at msg? The form of wrapping hands that's legal in Vegas but not in NY. True. But yeah, overall, I'd prefer to have 1 controversial win on my record than 3, not to mention 5 super shady scorecards. I'd also prefer to have wins over young undefeated talent such as a vargas, Reid, oba carr, Campas, than all of my big wins being either controversial or vs guys in their late 30s. Oh, and since we were on the topic of cheating, I'd definitely prefer not to have 2 positive ped tests on my legacy either.

[Jab jab boom]

Not true you’re wrong, right after the fight he went to ESPN deportes with Bernardo Ozana, Julio Cesar Chavez Sr. And the biggest Canelo’s hater David Faitelson who tried for the whole hour they interviewed Abel to admit that they got screwed on the decision Abel rebuked him at least 5 times saying canelo won fair and square, and they should give props to Canelo for such a great performance. So please stop reaching.

yeah, you're twisting it around. It was stated on here that Abel said that he scored the fight for Canelo. Either provide a link where he says that, of gtfoh.

[Jab jab boom]

Yes but he outlanded with mainly jabs, while canelo out landed GGG in power punches in both fights. Since when a jab is the determining factor for the outcome of a fight? Never mind it is only when it fits your agenda.

hmmm, let's see, since when is a jab a determining factor in a fight? Somebody named Larry Holmes dominated the hw division for about 7 yrs with the jab being his primary weapon, Thomas hearns, winky Wright, Whitaker Hagler, all put together pretty decent careers with the jab being their main weapon. You're the one spinning things to fit your agenda by implying as if ggg only landed his jab. He landed his jab as his primary punch, but also managed to land over 100 power punches in each of the 2 matches vs canelo. Sht, I'd think that if Canelo was such as master boxer, shouldn't he have been able to take GGG's jab away to an extent??

[whoseyourdaddy]

...to me, GGG won both fights, but DLH has the judges and ref in his pockets. Only way to beat Canelo is by knockout. but what I don't understand is why people keep writing GGG offf, he's only fought the best!

GGG fought the best like Geale, Monroe, Wade, the monster Ishida, Curtis Stevens, Rosado etc. No doubt about it GGG fought nothing but the best bums. You dumb clown.

[Boxing-1013]

he was getting frustrated, and he was getting dished up

Golovkin looked hesitant at times and afraid to commit

just like he was with Jacobs







I agree with sterilizer..... you guys who think that Lumpkin won the rematch are..... " special "

Canelo beat the Mexican out of that boy

Lol OK Mr Beta's...this coming from a guy who doesn't even know 5th grade grammar rules, why should anyone think you are smart enough to have an informed opinion about anything? And you have the nerve to call other people special lol. From reading your posts it is clear your IQ is legitimately probably near 80 or less. Look up what people in that range are called.

Btw - obviously a guy can still clearly win a fight without completely dominating every second of the fight. The loser can have good moments too. GGG won 8-3-1 in punch stats in fight 2 so saying he won, or even clearly won, would be backed up by the punch stats.

[Boxing-1013]

you word-nerds are beta's

Lol you low IQ ******. You don't even know elementary school grammar but you have the nerve to call other people ****** lol. What a ***. Work on your spelling. Read a book. Listen to people who are a lot smarter than you. You are a complete embarrassment but I suspect you know that already, Mr Beta's!

[Boxing-1013]

Thank you for posting this. This forum is so great but too many ggg haters on here. How can anybody not give credit to GGG for boxing so smart and nicely in the second fight. It was close fight but GGG won it. I still believe GGG wins the third one more convincingly so the judges can't rob his deserved victory

Thanks. I like the way the articles are displayed and there are some good, informed posters on here. But yeah there are unfortunately a lot of low IQ haters on here too who are given too much of a voice. The over the top hate for GGG is really absurd considering all he has accomplished.

I hope you are right about fight 3! I think Canelo improved more than GGG in fight 2 though so not sure how the 3rd one will go. Just hope it is a good one and both guys stay healthy.