I just don't think they are as good as billed. They are good, but not in the way that they have been talked up.
Do you think the Charlos' inactivity is taking it's toll?
Collapse
-
bruh it looks like they like getting hammered.....
thatll eventually become a problem like tapia.... heard he was a drinker/party guy.... imo takes alot out of youComment
-
Comment
-
MPDKSAB one of the greatest quotes ever for a reason. The main problem in this particular case is people think because they're twins that how & they way the fight is interchangeable. They do not fight the same & one brother is clearly on another level than the other. How you a boxing fan but talk about these people as if they're one person. Remove your emotions & you'll see intangibles matter.
I be wondering what is ya'll definition of struggle. The highlight of what he did is equivalent to what Linares did vs Lomachenko. He scored a KD & pretty much did nothing else definitive for the rest of the fight. Do ya'll expect nobody to be able to win rounds against another fighter unless they're perceived to be as elite as them?
Andrade unequivocally won that fight vs Vanes. Like clearly, no debating! Dudes be tryna rewrite history. What's interesting to me tho is what dudes always leave out when they bring up Charlo, Vanes, Andrade fight. Vanes maintains to this day (Wilder voice) that he beat Charlo. He also admitted that he lost to Andrade. That means he himself couldn't give himself the benefit of the doubt.
Lastly as far as Andrade not being as good as people want him to be. Ask your favorite fighter/trainer about him. I've never heard anybody downplay his talent. Even the Charlo brothers have acknowledged it!Comment
-
-
Comment
Comment