I take your point, but are we really arguing for maintaining fairness under a boxing organisation? We know their rankings are horse shit.
It stinks, but it always stinks. From a fan perspective it was a more worthy fight for the belt.
Does it damage the WBA's credibility? Do they have any credibility? 3 champions plus region champions and guys in their top 10 that will never get near a title fight.
It stinks, but it always stinks. From a fan perspective it was a more worthy fight for the belt.
Does it damage the WBA's credibility? Do they have any credibility? 3 champions plus region champions and guys in their top 10 that will never get near a title fight.
Comment