Originally posted by kafkod
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Deontay Wilder: Nobody Fighting Killers Back To Back Like Me
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by doom_specialist View PostOrtiz's last 5 wins are no better than Povetkin's, and I'll just leave it there since I liked Ortiz's wins. The difference is, Ortiz didn't sit on the shelf for a year for roids. You know at the end of the day that Joshua's win is equal to Wilder's at best, given their ages and circumstances. Hope you can at least tell the truth about that.
Wilder-Fury brought in more than Joshua-Povetkin, and Joshua-Parker, and that was reported on this site. I never said Wilder makes more than Joshua, but his PPV debut did bring in more than Joshua's last 2 performances, and the rematch likely will too. Nationality has nothing to do with the ability to count lol.
You can do your little blah blah about A-side status, but Wilder is bringing in more revenue than Joshua with 25% of his PPV viewership, and is in the same league pay wise as well. He offered $50M, accepted the $15M lowball, but he's the diva? Joshua said he wants to make less money to fight at home, but he's NOT the diva? I guess we'll have to agree to disagree because that's unadulterated bull**** lol
You liked Ortiz' last 5 opponents? Hahahahahahahaha. I think you're the only one crazy enough to say that. And there are some serious loons on here.
You think Wilder's win against an unproven hypejob is better than Joshua's win over Wlad? Pure madness, nothing more. It doesn't even come close to that win.
The numbers don't add up with the Wilder/Fury fight. It's all bull****. Nothing more than propaganda to convince Hearn that Wilder is doing well. As I say, it's all bull****. Have you noticed Showtime hasn't even come out with the numbers or confirmed it yet? Because they know it's all bull****.
Wilder doesn't make more than Joshua but he's in the same pay league? What????? No he isn't. Nor does Wilder bring in more money in 25% of his PPV than Joshua brings in in 100%. Stop talking rubbish. The suits take 55% before any money is shared out. Then you have his promoter and his many managers taking their cut.
The 50 Mill offer has been debunked many times on here. Where have you been?
Finkle lied about taking the 15 Mill offer. At first he said he did, but was then on camera saying they never accepted it. Stop believing in the propaganda will you. It's all lies that have been exposed.
Joshua isn't going to give the home advantage to Wilder while he's the A side. No A side would do that. Nor does he have any interest in getting robbed over there like everybody else does.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Superarms1 View PostWhen and who did AJ end of fighting? All that time in between...he could have given Ortiz a title shot . That is how he was able to opt out when Ortiz was calling him out. After and during the WBA rankings dilemma.. ..have some personal respect nerd.
He then fought Takam as a replacement to Pulev as the IBF Mando ordered before AJ even fought Klitscko for WBA. Meanwhile Ortiz and his team failed to fill in form dropping WBA rankings whilst at the same time choosing to go with Wilder instead and getting KO'd.
AJ then fought Parker for unification.
And after that Povetkin to fulfill WBA Mando after Wilder talks broke down.
So since the only voluntary fight was the unification with Parker, you're saying AJ should have fought Ortiz a month after Wilder knocked him out instead of unifying?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sid-Knee View PostPovetkin's last 5 is better than Ortiz' last 5. There is no debate to be had. They're not great from Povetkin, but they are clearly better than what Ortiz is doing.
You liked Ortiz' last 5 opponents? Hahahahahahahaha. I think you're the only one crazy enough to say that. And there are some serious loons on here.
You think Wilder's win against an unproven hypejob is better than Joshua's win over Wlad? Pure madness, nothing more. It doesn't even come close to that win.
The numbers don't add up with the Wilder/Fury fight. It's all bull****. Nothing more than propaganda to convince Hearn that Wilder is doing well. As I say, it's all bull****. Have you noticed Showtime hasn't even come out with the numbers or confirmed it yet? Because they know it's all bull****.
Wilder doesn't make more than Joshua but he's in the same pay league? What????? No he isn't. Nor does Wilder bring in more money in 25% of his PPV than Joshua brings in in 100%. Stop talking rubbish. The suits take 55% before any money is shared out. Then you have his promoter and his many managers taking their cut.
The 50 Mill offer has been debunked many times on here. Where have you been?
Finkle lied about taking the 15 Mill offer. At first he said he did, but was then on camera saying they never accepted it. Stop believing in the propaganda will you. It's all lies that have been exposed.
Joshua isn't going to give the home advantage to Wilder while he's the A side. No A side would do that. Nor does he have any interest in getting robbed over there like everybody else does.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ake-Dawg View PostYou left out the part where Finkel said he didn't want to talk or sit down until Hearn sent a PROPER offer.
Oh and you are the one proclaiming what isn't happening...thus you should be the one proving what you're saying is true. You're not so.e Oracle that gets to declare things as true for the sake of making your argument without providing any links, quotes, or other forms of proof.
Finkle won't say anything about any offers because all he's interested in is the PR war and propaganda. It weakens his position if he does. He could come out and say the latest offers are bogus, but guess what, he hasn't. Funny that isn't it? Finkle could call Hearn a liar. But he hasn't.
No matter how much Finkle and Wilder are exposed, you still defend it. Just as you're defending Wilder taking on Brezeale when the AJ fight is there to be had. They're not sitting down and seeing what is what. It's clear they are not interested.. Just like they weren't interested in the past. It's the same ****ing games.
Comment
-
-
-
Originally posted by Superarms1 View PostWhen and who did AJ end of fighting? All that time in between...he could have given Ortiz a title shot . That is how he was able to opt out when Ortiz was calling him out. After and during the WBA rankings dilemma.. ..have some personal respect nerd.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ake-Dawg View PostOrtiz Whyte or Ortiz Chisora would be at a fast pace. Both would get KOd trying to push the pace versus the big southpaw.
I didn't speak of any boxing experts.
But nah Ortiz hasn't got that engine or KO power anymore, he had Wilder out on his feet and couldn't put him down which has happened to Wilder so can be done, being southpaw isn't an automatic win either.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ake-Dawg View PostThe value of the belt lies within the waist it's around. WBO belt was trash the minute it started floating around only to be captured in a patty cake war between Ruiz and Parker.
When Hearn offers something close to 40% or better or even a $20M plus upside deal, then you can cry about Wilder asking for 50-50. Otherwise it's just a convenient excuse to allow Hearn to play games.
Ruiz is better than Ortiz' biggest win in Jennings. So if you have something negative to say about Parker, you'll have an even more negative view of Ortiz. But you won't, because you're a hypocrite. Keep pretending Ortiz has proven something when he clearly hasn't. Parker has proven more to any rational fan who isn't biased.
Comment
Comment