Originally posted by Southpaw16
Every Boxer Sucks
Collapse
-
De La Hoya was a bit of a challenge because usually one of my key points of attack is to claim that the fighter ducked everybody, and De La Hoya has fought everyone imaginable and been competitive. But there are definite reason why people can claim he ******.Originally posted by versatile2k6not a very good 1 for de la hoya. u know he was good so i bet u struggled abit on itComment
-
Ray LeonardOriginally posted by Southpaw16De La Hoya was a bit of a challenge because usually one of my key points of attack is to claim that the fighter ducked everybody, and De La Hoya has fought everyone imaginable and been competitive. But there are definite reason why people can claim he ******.Comment
-
Originally posted by Southpaw16Never beat another top fighter, in their prime, because he lost whenever he had the chance against Mosely, Trinidad, and Hopkins. Almost all of his big wins were gift decisions i.e. Quartey, Sturm, Whitaker. Boxers are called "fighters" because they are supposed to "fight", not run around the ring like a chicken **** singing pop songs.
Quartey wasnt a gift decision you dumbass, he won it clearly
Comment
-
-
Comment
nothing you can say bad about him
Comment