Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Khan Smiles: I Would Have Stopped Kell Brook in Six Rounds

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by MEXfistology View Post
    According to this website, everytime a fighter says something he's supposedly 'smiling'
    Khans always smiling the smug c**t

    Even after AJ piped his mrs he was still smiling

    Comment


    • #22
      Khan vs Crawford

      Brook vs Porter rematch


      Before Khan vs Brook in September 2019.

      Comment


      • #23
        Khans a funny guy who wants people at their weakest? Doesn’t mind not getting credit like floyd.
        But khan probably feels he should get credit just for making fight.

        Comment


        • #24
          Is this dude serious? IF you have the balls to actually step in the ring with brook YOU WILL GET STOPPED Khan and you know it. That's Why you're playing hard to get like a teenage ******.

          A part of me thinks Brook purposely looked like **** just so your delusional ass can think what you're thinking now.

          Can't wait to see this diva doing the stinky leg after brook connects on his chin.

          Comment


          • #25
            The hate for Khan in the boxing community is unreal and unwarranted to the point where I can only put it down to some racial bias seriously and im not one to play the race card regularly at all But the guy is an alright guy and proven himself to be brave and a good fighter and had a much much less protected career than Kell brook but some how Hearn has spun you guys the narrative that Khan career will come down to whether he fights the no belt having broken eyed brook. I'm a fellow Yorkshire man I have every reason to support brook over Khan but it's just impossible to do if you've objectively observed their career paths and then you have guys in here saying sinister things like is their anyone you want to hit with a shovel more than this delusional tw*t lol a bit extreme no? And you yanks seem to had bought into it as well. I'm no boxing expert but been around long enough to remember Khan starting his pro career and keeping boxing alive in the UK and on terrestrial tv and then taking difficult fights back to back like Garcia and Peterson, two of Khans wins ie mallinaggi & maidana surpass any of Brooks titles defenses. Khan ftw I say and if I was him I defo wouldnt give you casual nobeds what u want, go for the Crawford fight much more at stake and can make up for a lot of his career losses with a Cinderella win over Crawford. He would be Crawford's best opponent to date at 147 quite possibly so why not it sounds like fun. Hearn is trashing that fight becauae its with bob arum for espn+ and directly competes with DAZN. But brook vs Khan is an in-house domestic fight he can sell to the UK casuals

            Comment


            • #26
              ^^^^^^^^ Stop it bro. People hate Khan because he talks but hasn't done anything besides get ko'd by Nelo since he left 140. Its been almost 6 years and he hasn't fought 1 decent WW. Id love for him to grow a pair and fight any top 5 ww. He gets ko'd by any and all but is scared to fight.

              Comment


              • #27
                Khan didn't look good in his last fight either. His chin has become worse. Brook will stop him.

                Comment


                • #28
                  yeah, literally in his dreams.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by SuperSuperLeeds View Post
                    The hate for Khan in the boxing community is unreal and unwarranted to the point where I can only put it down to some racial bias seriously and im not one to play the race card regularly at all But the guy is an alright guy and proven himself to be brave and a good fighter and had a much much less protected career than Kell brook but some how Hearn has spun you guys the narrative that Khan career will come down to whether he fights the no belt having broken eyed brook. I'm a fellow Yorkshire man I have every reason to support brook over Khan but it's just impossible to do if you've objectively observed their career paths and then you have guys in here saying sinister things like is their anyone you want to hit with a shovel more than this delusional tw*t lol a bit extreme no? And you yanks seem to had bought into it as well. I'm no boxing expert but been around long enough to remember Khan starting his pro career and keeping boxing alive in the UK and on terrestrial tv and then taking difficult fights back to back like Garcia and Peterson, two of Khans wins ie mallinaggi & maidana surpass any of Brooks titles defenses. Khan ftw I say and if I was him I defo wouldnt give you casual nobeds what u want, go for the Crawford fight much more at stake and can make up for a lot of his career losses with a Cinderella win over Crawford. He would be Crawford's best opponent to date at 147 quite possibly so why not it sounds like fun. Hearn is trashing that fight becauae its with bob arum for espn+ and directly competes with DAZN. But brook vs Khan is an in-house domestic fight he can sell to the UK casuals
                    What a load of bull. Boxing fans love boxers from all races. Why bring race when this has all to do with Khan? Boxing fans don't mind if you run your mouth as long as you can back it up. All Khan ever does is talk big fights then go and get someone from the old people's home. His only fight in recent memory is with Canelo, before that he never really fought a top 5 opponent in his own weight class. Did he fight the best at 140 or 147. Right now we have had Thurman, Porter, Spence did he fight any of those guys?

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by SuperSuperLeeds View Post
                      The hate for Khan in the boxing community is unreal and unwarranted to the point where I can only put it down to some racial bias seriously and im not one to play the race card regularly at all But the guy is an alright guy and proven himself to be brave and a good fighter and had a much much less protected career than Kell brook but some how Hearn has spun you guys the narrative that Khan career will come down to whether he fights the no belt having broken eyed brook. I'm a fellow Yorkshire man I have every reason to support brook over Khan but it's just impossible to do if you've objectively observed their career paths and then you have guys in here saying sinister things like is their anyone you want to hit with a shovel more than this delusional tw*t lol a bit extreme no? And you yanks seem to had bought into it as well. I'm no boxing expert but been around long enough to remember Khan starting his pro career and keeping boxing alive in the UK and on terrestrial tv and then taking difficult fights back to back like Garcia and Peterson, two of Khans wins ie mallinaggi & maidana surpass any of Brooks titles defenses. Khan ftw I say and if I was him I defo wouldnt give you casual nobeds what u want, go for the Crawford fight much more at stake and can make up for a lot of his career losses with a Cinderella win over Crawford. He would be Crawford's best opponent to date at 147 quite possibly so why not it sounds like fun. Hearn is trashing that fight becauae its with bob arum for espn+ and directly competes with DAZN. But brook vs Khan is an in-house domestic fight he can sell to the UK casuals
                      oh fk off with the race card shouts nothing more weak than crying over bein called names Khan is hated for his ego he's p4p best after butuak no defeat after each other then slating brook when he got schooled by an even worse fighter in his last mediocre contest and you go back to maidina and any good win he had was under roach and ariza shakes was clearly on the juice he's a fake and worse be cheat who will lose badly to a washed up brook

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP