If the majority of the voting members had Fury winning, why wouldn’t they put him ahead of Wilder?
The fights happen in the ring, not on the judges scorecard. Experienced fans know what they are watching and if they think a fighter has won, 3 judges seeing it differently shouldn’t make any difference, especially not with the history of corruption and poor judging that comes with our sport.
The fights happen in the ring, not on the judges scorecard. Experienced fans know what they are watching and if they think a fighter has won, 3 judges seeing it differently shouldn’t make any difference, especially not with the history of corruption and poor judging that comes with our sport.
Comment