British judge had it 113-113. That was the best and most reasonable score of all three.
Why are Americans defending the judge that had it 115-111?
Collapse
-
I'll never understand it.
I don't even get why people get so affected by it that they seem mentally unstable and start posting insane things.
I love boxing as much as the next person but if the fighter i want to win loses, so what? just admit it for what it is and move on. One must live a pretty futile life if a boxing match between two strangers seemingly sends them into a spiral of delusion for days after the fight.
Seems a bit crazy to get as upset and delusional as people on here simply because one man is a better boxer than another man.Comment
-
What a bizarre persona you try to give off and play on this forum, and with that username.Most ringside observers had the fight 114-112 Fury, 114-112 Wilder, or 113-113. The majority of ringside scores were one of those three scores.
So if someone had it one round different from that, 115-111 in either direction, in a subjective sport, it's hard to argue.
When you're ringside, it's a totally different perspective on what's landing clean, what's doing damage, what's being slipped, how hard a blow is, etc.
I personally had Wilder and Fury even after 4, Fury up 4 after 8, and the fight even after 12. But if someone gave Wilder 1 round during 5-8, it'd be hard for me to argue. If someone had Fury winning 1-4, or Wilder winning 1-4, it'd be hard for me to argue. There were a lot of rounds where Fury landed very little or was just throwing flashy combinations that primarily landed on Wilder's gloves.
Wilder was the clear aggressor and doing more damage. Fury showed incredible defense, but didn't always throw back very much. He did out land Wilder by about a dozen punches over 12 rounds (1 more landed punch per round), but he got knocked down twice.
I personally wouldn't score the fight 115-111 in either direction, but you never know what that judge was looking for.
Mayweather walked out disgusted, Lennox Lewis, Mike Tyson, ringside also felt Fury clearly won and was robbed.
Frank Bruno, Andre Ward, Boxingscene and most media deem Fury the clear winner.
The judge scoring it for Wilder had him winning the first 4 rounds.
Utter biased nonsense you spout constantly on this forum, it's actually distasteful.Comment
-
Many thought Fury won, many thought Wilder won, many had it a draw. More thought Fury won than thought Wilder won, but so many had it a draw that to complain about a draw is ridiculous.
Fury did very little in those rounds. I could see the first 4 for Wilder, I could also see the first 4 for Fury. I personally had the first four 2-2.The judge scoring it for Wilder had him winning the first 4 rounds.
I don't have any bias, which is why I frustrate you so much. You keep trying to figure out my agenda, but my only agenda is the truth. I don't care who looks good or looks bad. I only care about the truth.Utter biased nonsense you spout constantly on this forum, it's actually distasteful.Comment
-
Comment
-
All this outrage! But let's not pretend it was as atrocious as the 118-110 Canelo card now.
I'm American and ffs so many bad cards in America. It's what happens when money rules. No way the boxing shadow lords would let Fury win. No way they would let GGG win.
Point is, if you ain't American or your name isnt Canelo dont fight in America.Comment
-
114-112 Fury...
Even if you somehow give Wilder 5 rounds that's still a draw ....
I realistically give Wilder 4 rounds, 2 kd rounds and 2 roujds where Fury didn't do much and Deontay landed some hard blows.
If you really want you give Fury max 5 rounds ..
Usyk was getting on cards, Loma was getting robbed on cards multiple times ..that same night Gvozdyk was getting robbed...
Do I need to get into Canelo cards?
Even Floyd had **** cards with Maidana and Canelo...
Be happy Fury didn't loose.
But why is everyone so upset ?
This siht has been happening for years ....what's different here ?Last edited by Banderivets; 12-03-2018, 09:51 PM.Comment
-
Comment
Comment