[Scorecard Thread] Just re-watched "2 fast" Fury vs "Bronze Bomber" Wilder...

[DaNeutral.]

I shared the 1st round 10-10. I gave the 2nd to Wilder and gave him 10-8 rounds for 9 and 12. Fury won all the rest 10-9.

115-112 Fury. Watched it twice didnt change my mind. Only thing i considered changing was round 1 where i was tempted to award it to Fury 10-9.

[B Phontain]

Scored the fight 117-110 Tyson Fury on a second pass. Essentially the same score I had last night, verifiable in the rbr thread.

My Breakdown of the fight round by round is below:

1 10-9 Fury
2 10-9 Fury
3 10-9 Fury
4 10-9 Fury
5 10-9 Fury
6 10-9 Fury
7 10-9 Fury
8 10-9 Fury
9 10-9 Wilder
10 10-9 Fury
11 10-9 Fury
12 10-8 Wilder

I just can't see how anyone gives Wilder the 2nd, 3rd, or even first round. When they interviewed Floyd I had his same card of 5-0 at the time. How does anyone end up with something
different? Please post round by round scoring and total cards.

I'll have to go back and watch the fight again. But i distinctly remember giving wilder rds 1 and possibly 2. Also statiscally he supposedly out landed fury almost 2-1 in rd 7.

[LoadedWraps]

I had it
1. 10-9 Fury
2. 10-9 Wilder
3. 10-10
4.10-9 Wilder
5. 10-9 Fury
6. 10-9 Wilder
7. 10-9 Fury
8. 10-9 Fury
9. 10-8 Wilder
10. 10-9 Fury
11. 10-9 Fury
12. 10-8 Wilder.

The announcing was very biased towards Fury IMO.

The announcing was biased toward Wilder imo, making a big deal out of glancing blows and whiffs.

[TonyGe]

The announcing was biased toward Wilder imo, making a big deal out of glancing blows and whiffs.

The announcing was biased towards Fury. They barely talked about Wilder. It was Fury's back story and how he was landing punches that didn't land. Don't get me wrong Fury landed punches but the announcers were on an agenda IMO.

[LoadedWraps]

The announcing was biased towards Fury. They barely talked about Wilder. It was Fury's back story and how he was landing punches that didn't land. Don't get me wrong Fury landed punches but the announcers were on an agenda IMO.

Were you watching Showtime? Or Sky, or who ever does in in the UK?

[LoadedWraps]

What a fight.

Had to re-watch it today. Might be the greatest masterclass since Floyd beat JMM.

[HeadBodyBodyBody]

I'll have to go back and watch the fight again. But i distinctly remember giving wilder rds 1 and possibly 2. Also statiscally he supposedly out landed fury almost 2-1 in rd 7.

where did you get that info?

compubox had it 7/40 landed for Wilder, and 5/26 landed for fury, in rd. 7. But then compubox is shit anyway

I scored it:
10-9 Fury (Fury lands several lovely shots, in comparison to just two good jabs from Wilder)

[LoadedWraps]

where did you get that info?

compubox had it 7/40 landed for Wilder, and 5/26 landed for fury, in rd. 7. But then compubox is shit anyway

I scored it:
10-9 Fury (Fury lands several lovely shots, in comparison to just two good jabs from Wilder)

Yea, compubox isn't the most reliable.

I don't remember round 7 being a Wilder round, will have to rewatch it again.

[Earl-Hickey]

I've seen it multiple times its either 116-111 or 115-112 if I'm being generous to Wilder and giving him the 2nd round.

The volume of punches WAS fairly close but even if it was equal you go to ring generalship and effective agression and those weren't close AT ALL.

The final round knockdown was a massive blessing for Wilder because by the 10th round the fight honestly was beginning to resemble Calzaghe vs lacy. But the final knockdown saved Wilders reputation

[Toffee]

It's nearly impossible to be unbiased.

I find it difficult to live score early rounds. Invariably I'm looking for something... and by Round 3 or so I'm understanding the fight better.

So I can understand the judges having similar issues. Also, they don't have the benefit of our view of the fight.

Basically, I'm pretty good at trying to see other perspectives after the fact. And I still can't get a Wilder win!