Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Deontay Wilder vs. Tyson Fury - Official Scorecards - Photo

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #71
    Originally posted by MDPopescu View Post
    ... by "that fight" you mean Wilder vs Joshua?... well, OK then
    yes. It's always been AJ/Whyte II in April. Eddie has even been talking as if the fight is already signed.

    Comment


    • #72
      Originally posted by _Rexy_ View Post
      yes. It's always been AJ/Whyte II in April. Eddie has even been talking as if the fight is already signed.
      ... From what i saw so far, Hearn doesn't "function" like this!... He's after the big money... (I mean his own money)... At this very point, Joshua vs White 2 would sell less than shit...

      Comment


      • #73
        Originally posted by MDPopescu View Post
        ... From what i saw so far, Hearn doesn't "function" like this!... He's after the big money... (I mean his own money)... At this very point, Joshua vs White 2 would sell less than shit...
        AJ/Whyte would sell out Wembly. Half the people there don't care who AJ is fighting.

        Its a garbage fight, but people will eat it up. Just like they're eating up Whyte/Chisora II

        Comment


        • #74
          Originally posted by _Rexy_ View Post
          AJ/Whyte would sell out Wembly. Half the people there don't care who AJ is fighting.

          Its a garbage fight, but people will eat it up. Just like they're eating up Whyte/Chisora II
          ... I don't want to argue with you... but the British fans will put the pressure for AJ vs Fury... people are not that dumb, man... WTF?

          Comment


          • #75
            Originally posted by MDPopescu View Post
            ... I don't want to argue with you... but the British fans will put the pressure for AJ vs Fury... people are not that dumb, man... WTF?
            We'll have to agree to disagree on that one. I want to agree with you. I want you to be right. I just know you aren't, unfortunately

            Comment


            • #76
              Originally posted by KnickTillDeaTh View Post
              Again, we have another fight where people are scoring based on the totality of the fight and not round by round. The reality of this fight is, there were many close rounds because Wilder chose to fight one punch at a time, and Fury decided to move more than punch. Neither fighter deserved to win, and anyone who doesn't see how this fight was a draw, or could have gone to either fighter by 1 point is more than likely lacking the knowledge to score a boxing match. All the Wilder haters saying Fury dominated are absolutely ******ed. A boxer who dominates a fight doesn't land 24% of his punches gets knocked down twice, one of which left him out cold for at least 6 seconds. Fury was getting credit for his movement, and more so for what Wilder didn't do rather than what was actually happening in the fight, where as Wilder was not given credit for his jab or body work. I believe when people watch the fight again, many will change their assessment.

              I had it 113-113
              Gave Wilder the first 2 rounds and one of the middle rounds. I can't remember the round but it was a round where Wilder did some great body work and Fury ran around the ring after a couple of body shots. I believe it was round 5 or 6. Plus the knock downs in round 9 and 12, and you have yourself a draw.

              Fury would have won the fight 7-5 on rounds if not for the knock downs, and that's the reality.

              The reality is you don’t know sht about boxing

              You are a wilder fan boy who is desperate to protect this robbery

              Only a moron would give wilder the first row rounds

              You clearly have zero knowledge despite claiming to have some in scoring a boxing

              Log off and don’t come back, you are a cancer to the sport

              Comment


              • #77
                Originally posted by _Rexy_ View Post
                We'll have to agree to disagree on that one. I want to agree with you. I want you to be right. I just know you aren't, unfortunately
                I don't have a horse in this race... ... We all know that the Brits love "all UK fights"... but at this very point one can't simply sell AJ vs White instead of AJ vs Fury... (but I can agree with you that there will not be AJ vs Wilder next)...

                Comment


                • #78
                  Originally posted by Falkano View Post
                  All very true.
                  But the stats show Fury landed more than Wilder in those rounds.
                  As for the nose it didn't bleed long did it? What about Wilders eye bruising?

                  Like I said/implied it all boils down to what your interpretation of boxing actually is. For me if you got a guy on the front foot, throwing a lot more punches but not actually connecting because the other guy used skill to move out of the way doesn't mean they won the round. Mayweather would never have won a fight if you applied that logic.

                  Not being hit is just as much a key part of winning a fight as landing a shot it.
                  It was busted though and Fury did no damage in the rd in which that occurred, but somehow people are scoring that rd for Fury. As far as the bruising, Fury definitely deserved to win the rd in which it occurred.

                  The fact of the matter is I see a lot of people saying it was 9-3 agreeing with the Farhood score, but at the same time 0 of them can agree on which rd Wilder won without a Kd. That tells me that many of the rds were close. There was only a 13 punch differential and Fury landed more in the rds where he was Kd. So in the other rds the action was close. Fury just set the tone of the fight.

                  And as far as Mayweather, his defensive capabilities led to counters and eventually walking the opponent down in that shell offense. Fury had a few counters and was only offensive after Wilder landed something showy and he wanted to get those points back.

                  Comment


                  • #79
                    Originally posted by KnickTillDeaTh View Post
                    Again, we have another fight where people are scoring based on the totality of the fight and not round by round. The reality of this fight is, there were many close rounds because Wilder chose to fight one punch at a time, and Fury decided to move more than punch. Neither fighter deserved to win, and anyone who doesn't see how this fight was a draw, or could have gone to either fighter by 1 point is more than likely lacking the knowledge to score a boxing match. All the Wilder haters saying Fury dominated are absolutely ******ed. A boxer who dominates a fight doesn't land 24% of his punches gets knocked down twice, one of which left him out cold for at least 6 seconds. Fury was getting credit for his movement, and more so for what Wilder didn't do rather than what was actually happening in the fight, where as Wilder was not given credit for his jab or body work. I believe when people watch the fight again, many will change their assessment.

                    I had it 113-113
                    Gave Wilder the first 2 rounds and one of the middle rounds. I can't remember the round but it was a round where Wilder did some great body work and Fury ran around the ring after a couple of body shots. I believe it was round 5 or 6. Plus the knock downs in round 9 and 12, and you have yourself a draw.

                    Fury would have won the fight 7-5 on rounds if not for the knock downs, and that's the reality.
                    Thats your reality. If you scored it 113-113 then You have to be right and anyone that scored it any different is ******ed

                    Comment


                    • #80
                      Originally posted by lfc19titles View Post
                      The reality is you don’t know sht about boxing

                      You are a wilder fan boy who is desperate to protect this robbery

                      Only a moron would give wilder the first row rounds

                      You clearly have zero knowledge despite claiming to have some in scoring a boxing

                      Log off and don’t come back, you are a cancer to the sport
                      Prove to me where i'm a Wilder fan boy. Or are you a Wilder hater. Test my knowledge. Break down the fight so I can pick you apart and make you look ******. Funny how you didn't dispute any of my points, typical low knowledge idiot that scores fights based on feelings. Keep it moving, you add nothing of value to the discourse.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP