Again, we have another fight where people are scoring based on the totality of the fight and not round by round. The reality of this fight is, there were many close rounds because Wilder chose to fight one punch at a time, and Fury decided to move more than punch. Neither fighter deserved to win, and anyone who doesn't see how this fight was a draw, or could have gone to either fighter by 1 point is more than likely lacking the knowledge to score a boxing match. All the Wilder haters saying Fury dominated are absolutely ******ed. A boxer who dominates a fight doesn't land 24% of his punches gets knocked down twice, one of which left him out cold for at least 6 seconds. Fury was getting credit for his movement, and more so for what Wilder didn't do rather than what was actually happening in the fight, where as Wilder was not given credit for his jab or body work. I believe when people watch the fight again, many will change their assessment.
I had it 113-113
Gave Wilder the first 2 rounds and one of the middle rounds. I can't remember the round but it was a round where Wilder did some great body work and Fury ran around the ring after a couple of body shots. I believe it was round 5 or 6. Plus the knock downs in round 9 and 12, and you have yourself a draw.
Fury would have won the fight 7-5 on rounds if not for the knock downs, and that's the reality.
I had it 113-113
Gave Wilder the first 2 rounds and one of the middle rounds. I can't remember the round but it was a round where Wilder did some great body work and Fury ran around the ring after a couple of body shots. I believe it was round 5 or 6. Plus the knock downs in round 9 and 12, and you have yourself a draw.
Fury would have won the fight 7-5 on rounds if not for the knock downs, and that's the reality.
Comment