Where does AJ rank if he beats Wilder then Usyk?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Boksfan
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Nov 2017
    • 9185
    • 277
    • 355
    • 66,176

    #11
    Originally posted by BodiesInFlight
    Would those wins be better than Ortiz loss to Wilder? I doubt it. That loss really cemented his legacy.
    Definitely Ortiz ATG after that knockout lost.

    Comment

    • iamboxing
      ******a facking game
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Dec 2016
      • 6421
      • 672
      • 760
      • 29,458

      #12
      I almost punched the screen reading this. About time I ****ing logged off.

      Comment

      • Earl-Hickey
        Banned
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Nov 2009
        • 29031
        • 2,832
        • 1,384
        • 297,750

        #13
        Originally posted by sunny31
        Are you serious? I think it's comments like this which do no justice to the British fan base lol

        He will start knocking on the door for HOF
        "Knocking on the door for hall of fame"

        Lol hed be undefeated undisputed and lineal heavyweight champion

        Hed be a first ballot HOF at worst

        Comment

        • sunny31
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Feb 2006
          • 5780
          • 450
          • 35
          • 128,703

          #14
          Originally posted by earl-hickey
          "Knocking on the door for hall of fame"

          Lol hed be undefeated undisputed and lineal heavyweight champion

          Hed be a first ballot HOF at worst
          No, as of today he would def not get in. A win over Wilder who is not considered a great heavyweight and Usyk who is a great cruiserweight but yet to prove he can make the jump, wouldn't necessarily push Joshua over the top. But it would certainly put him close either way. If you put those wins in followed by longevity at the top then yes he would prob be first ballot. Also if those guys went on to have more success at heavyweight then that would further solidify his claim, but it's not as you perceive it, honestly, or at least I disagree with you. Your assertion that he could be considered a top10 ATG heavyweight after those wins is preposterous at best.
          Last edited by sunny31; 11-18-2018, 07:14 PM.

          Comment

          • Sid-Knee
            Undisputed Champion
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Oct 2015
            • 18249
            • 1,091
            • 731
            • 155,532

            #15
            Originally posted by sunny31
            Are you serious? I think it's comments like this which do no justice to the British fan base lol

            He will start knocking on the door for HOF
            Foreman is considered an ATG with only 4 good wins in his career. Frazier with only 2. Marciano is usually put in the top 10 of greatest fighters in history P4P. Ali is considered the greatest even though he lost most of his fights against very low skilled fighters but got continuous gifts. The fighters he did beat are so brutally overrated it isn't even funny. Liston beat no one, but is considered an ATG.

            Look at the crazy American fan base before you go judging. No one horribly overrates the way you guys do. Basic, ordinary fighters with **** resumes being cast of as the greatest of the great. Haha.

            Comment

            • BLASTER1
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Dec 2017
              • 9068
              • 608
              • 1,290
              • 335,405

              #16
              ATG no.
              HOF yes in my opinion.
              At the moment their just aren't enough good heavyweights that he can fight to be judged an ATG.
              Hoping some good prospects come thru and change the landscape of heavyweight.

              Comment

              • Sid-Knee
                Undisputed Champion
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Oct 2015
                • 18249
                • 1,091
                • 731
                • 155,532

                #17
                Originally posted by boliodogs
                I don't think so. He still had a close fight with Parker who isn't that good and a very old Wlad damn near knocked him out. Two wins over good fighters don't make some of his weaker showings go away. He would need lots of good wins to show he has improved a lot. A boxer is judged as an all time great based on all the fights he had in his prime including his worst fights and not just two good wins.
                The Parker fight in which Joshua dominated against a fighter who disengaged and ran all night was close?

                I think you should stop scoring fights my man.

                Comment

                • Sid-Knee
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Oct 2015
                  • 18249
                  • 1,091
                  • 731
                  • 155,532

                  #18
                  Originally posted by Boksfan
                  Higher than that Canadian Lewis, that's for sure.
                  Joshua would never come close to having even a third of Lewis' wins. The Brit Lewis was in a much superior era. Not even close.

                  Comment

                  • 4truth
                    U can't handle the Truth
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Feb 2016
                    • 15278
                    • 4,152
                    • 1,672
                    • 197,686

                    #19
                    This discussion is many wins and many years premature.

                    Comment

                    • Boksfan
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Nov 2017
                      • 9185
                      • 277
                      • 355
                      • 66,176

                      #20
                      Originally posted by Sid-Knee
                      Joshua would never come close to having even a third of Lewis' wins. The Brit Lewis was in a much superior era. Not even close.
                      You are deluded

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP