Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Fury: If I Fought Wilder In Manchester, We'd Sell 75,000 Tickets

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #71
    Originally posted by Laligalaliga View Post
    So tell me, which fighter has gotten 30% fighting wilder?

    you obviously mean Joshua..... ?

    2

    Klitschko and Parker

    stop making silly excuses LMAO..... you obviously know that until they offer Wilder at least as much as they offered Parker, they are full-of-shlt

    Comment


    • #72
      Originally posted by Boksfan View Post
      Another fact: you are a moron and you don't know what split means


      " split " in boxing terms, means..... how the pot is divided

      it is usually either a flat-fee..... or a percentage

      why am I wiping the ass of a silly casual-fan ?

      Comment


      • #73
        Originally posted by Pigeons View Post
        DAZN's first event in Chicago was selling yellow-section equivalent tickets for $40-60.


        Now that was Vargas-Dulorme, but they're trying to charge Mayweather ticket prices for this which is laughable. Doesn't matter to me as I am on the opposite side of the country though.
        Fair enough. Be really interesting to see the actual gate.

        Comment


        • #74
          Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
          you obviously mean Joshua..... ?

          2

          Klitschko and Parker

          stop making silly excuses LMAO..... you obviously know that until they offer Wilder at least as much as they offered Parker, they are full-of-shlt
          Stop trying to be smart. You look silly doing that. I asked you a direct and simple question. Obviously you can't come out with any answer.

          You can't claim to worth 50% when in your whole career, no one has gotten 30% fighting you.

          It's all shytte talk and talk and talk no action.

          Comment


          • #75
            Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
            you obviously mean Joshua..... ?

            2

            Klitschko and Parker

            stop making silly excuses LMAO..... you obviously know that until they offer Wilder at least as much as they offered Parker, they are full-of-shlt
            Why should Wilder get more than Parker?

            Lets look at the logic here

            Joshua 2 belts parker 1

            Joshua beats parker

            Joshua 3 belts wilder 1

            Why should wilder benefit financially from another mans work?

            it makes zero sense, Wilder should actually get 25% less than Parker got logically

            Joshua has 75% of the belts and brings like 80+ of the revenue

            I say 75-25 split in Joshuas favour, anything above that is overly generous to wilder

            Comment


            • #76
              Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
              you obviously mean Joshua..... ?

              2

              Klitschko and Parker

              stop making silly excuses LMAO..... you obviously know that until they offer Wilder at least as much as they offered Parker, they are full-of-shlt
              Parker made 6.5 mil. I'm sure Wilders offer was more than double that. Get a clue.

              Comment


              • #77
                Originally posted by Laligalaliga View Post
                Stop trying to be smart. You look silly doing that. I asked you a direct and simple question. Obviously you can't come out with any answer.

                You can't claim to worth 50% when in your whole career, no one has gotten 30% fighting you.

                It's all shytte talk and talk and talk no action.


                when (the NEW) Team Bullshlt make Wilder a reasonable offer (32.5% minimum), you can get back to me..... until that happens..... Joshua - and you fangirls - are full-of-shlt

                Comment


                • #78
                  Originally posted by earl-hickey View Post
                  Why should Wilder get more than Parker?

                  Lets look at the logic here

                  Joshua 2 belts parker 1

                  Joshua beats parker

                  Joshua 3 belts wilder 1

                  Why should wilder benefit financially from another mans work?

                  it makes zero sense, Wilder should actually get 25% less than Parker got logically

                  Joshua has 75% of the belts and brings like 80+ of the revenue

                  I say 75-25 split in Joshuas favour, anything above that is overly generous to wilder



                  the split has nothing to do with belts

                  until they offer Wilder, what they offered Parker..... you fangirls can continue embarrassing yourselves

                  they offered Parker 32.5% because they actually wanted to fight Parker

                  even Lewis knows whats up.....
                  https://www.boxingscene.com/lennox-l...o-fury--133811

                  Comment


                  • #79
                    Originally posted by Robbie Barrett View Post
                    Parker made 6.5 mil. I'm sure Wilders offer was more than double that. Get a clue.

                    he got 32.5%

                    rumored to be 12mil +

                    not sure if that was kiwi dollars

                    until Team Poshua offer Wilder AT LEAST 32.5%..... they clearly don't want that fight

                    Comment


                    • #80
                      Originally posted by 1hourRun View Post
                      Tyson Fury was going to rematch Wladimir Klistchko on a private yacht, true story.
                      Private cruise ship I thought, not a yacht.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP