Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Daniel Jacobs: We Absolutely Want Canelo Unification!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by 4truth View Post
    Not following your logic unless you think Golovkin has lost a lot over the last 2 years. Sergiy is good but I saw nothing last night to make me think he gives Golovkin much trouble.
    His team thought highly enough to lose a belt over him then fight him...

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Insanityisbliss View Post
      I’m in a position where I don’t have to be lured into a debate to satisfy your ego. Boxing is just a subjective sport to me. Business for them. It’s just that simple.
      if you don't want to be "lured into a debate" then don't come on a boxing message board. Especially if you make absurd comments about an all around fighter being "one dimensional". You should be able to tell from the responses that you've received that you made an absurd comment, so expect to be called out on it. The end.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Insanityisbliss View Post
        I’m in a position where I don’t have to be lured into a debate to satisfy your ego. Boxing is just a subjective sport to me. Business for them. It’s just that simple.
        We should find out real soon who's right and who's wrong. For the record almost everyone that guy picks loses.

        He took GGG by EASY TKO against Canelo.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Shadoww702 View Post
          His team thought highly enough to lose a belt over him then fight him...
          Not really, even Serhiy doesn't believe that and has said as much.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Jab jab boom View Post
            if you don't want to be "lured into a debate" then don't come on a boxing message board. Especially if you make absurd comments about an all around fighter being "one dimensional". You should be able to tell from the responses that you've received that you made an absurd comment, so expect to be called out on it. The end.

            Ill take Canelo to beat Jacobs. Ill even match you ALL your points. But loser closes their account...No debating that sht. I win bye Bi@tch.

            Comment


            • #36
              If anybody has actually EARNED a Canelo shot.. it is Jacobs.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by 4truth View Post
                Not really, even Serhiy doesn't believe that and has said as much.
                You have a link?? GGG lost his belt over not fighting him Sergiy wanted the fight GGG wanted his usual no hoper. IBF said NOPE!

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Illmatic94 View Post
                  If anybody has actually EARNED a Canelo shot.. it is Jacobs.
                  Yup. Cinco De Mayo 2019.

                  Should be a GREAT fight. Now I know why hes fighting Rocky in NY.

                  Size amd see how many ppl show up.

                  If it tanks then Canelo/Jacobs in Vegas.

                  If does good the fight is in NY.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Bronx2245 View Post
                    I like this fight at 160 or 168, SO LONG AS CANELO IS STRIPPED BY THE WBC! Charlo has been waiting patiently! GGG don't want that smoke! So if Canelo will fight Jacobs after Fielding on DAZN, he should do it without the WBC title!
                    Canelo will drop the WBC like a cheap ho. And they will beg him back lol

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Shadoww702 View Post
                      We should find out real soon who's right and who's wrong. For the record almost everyone that guy picks loses.

                      He took GGG by EASY TKO against Canelo.
                      I still predicted GGG to win. The result? He lost on paper due to politics when in reality he actually won that fight. Just like he won in the Olympics final. That’s a whole other topic, though. You’re trying to diminish my credibility while trying to elevate your own as a way to satisfy your ego and also claim some artificial victory that doesn’t exist. You’re basically deflecting off topic from Jacobs to another fight. So, I’d appreciate it if you didn’t fabricate whatever you can to fit your false narrative as a way to justify your agenda as well. Thank you. Have a good day.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP