Comments Thread For: Roach Says a Prime Pacquiao 'Walks Through' Everyone at 147

[pasawayako]

lol another ACE. Yes he did.

Even a hard core floyd fans couldn't deny it's a painful fact. lmao.

[strykr619]

and marquez didnt destroyed a prime pac.. marquez was getting whooped on before he knocked pac out!!! you trippin'!!

People have selective memories, JMM was bleeding and on his last rope, then manny gort hit with the once in a lifetime shot.

Their is a reason WHY he stopped fighting after that. It was a capstone to his career.

[Bronx2245]

A prime pac makes prime mayweather hide to a temporary retirement. A very easy work for pac.

A prime Pac was scared of needles, and his cuts couldn't heal, and had to have an outdoor stadium, etc.! He also had to have a catch weight with Cotto! No way he wins more than 4 rounds vs. Prime Mayweather! Arum and Roach knew it, and Manny did too!

[Mzembe]

It's not about the race but filipinos or not they love pac because of what he did in the ring.

Why you like floyd when all he did inside and outside the ring is disgusting. Inside the ring he's doing everything to gain advantage in his every opponent like cheating on scales, dirty tactics that the ref alllwed him to do, have his own drug testing company to give him a pass to use everthing but not his opponent, always given a gift win by the judges etc. outside the ring he beat women. lmao.

----------------------------------------

Once again can you answer the question; which other boxer do you know apart from Pacqiao?
Before Pacqiao did you ever follow boxing?

[IceTrayDaGang]

Cotto was better, but he fought at 145, not 147! Nobody else was as good (at 147) as Thurman, Spence, and Crawford!

So you discredit the cotto win saying it was at 145 (not the best cotto at 147) yet you make claims that 147 Spence and crawford is better based on what? Spence's best win is brook and Crawford at 147?? You see this is what I am talking about lol. Y'all try to discredit pac's win but then how y'all gonna hype Spence/crawford when they haven't even fought any top comp and this is the exact reason y'all shiiet on pac's 147 resume!!!!!!!!!!

[IceTrayDaGang]

--------------------------------------------

Everything that I wrote and you respond to the one rhetoric question of whether you are Filipino? A question that wasn't important at all but it's the one that you respond. Respond to the relevant points dude.

Seriously? Who is the small minded buffoon that likes his **** ****** by men? Clearly that's what you like.

because you asking that question threw everything else out the window. what the fvvk does it matter if im filipino or not? what a dumb ass!

[IceTrayDaGang]

-----------------------------------------------

What is wrong with you dude? Do you understand English? In all seriousness, stop comparing Spence to Pac. The guy holds a WW title and is trying to make the big fights against the top WW. He is also just 28 years old so his time is happening now. It's way too soon to compare his career to PAC. Let's have this conversation in two years. It is moot right now.

As for PAC I am putting an asterisk on his wins because of those reasons not because he is a juicer. Juicing does not make a boxer better so I don't buy into those allegations.

I am also highlighting PAC's wins against bonafide BUMS and I listed them for you. How do you justify those fights? And why couldn't PAC fight legit belt holders in his prime at 140 and 147? These are simple questions. Can you answer them without deflecting to non-factor issues?

so what's spence best win then since you like bringing up the wins for manny to downplay it?

[Bronx2245]

So you discredit the cotto win saying it was at 145 (not the best cotto at 147) yet you make claims that 147 Spence and crawford is better based on what? Spence's best win is brook and Crawford at 147?? You see this is what I am talking about lol. Y'all try to discredit pac's win but then how y'all gonna hype Spence/crawford when they haven't even fought any top comp and this is the exact reason y'all shiiet on pac's 147 resume!!!!!!!!!!

First of all Freddie said "Prime Manny" would "WALK" through everybody @ 147 today, yet that same Manny didn't beat Cotto @ 147! Spence and Crawford have thin resumes, but the eye test says Manny would not "WALK" through them! This is all speculation, but for Freddie to say Manny would "WALK" through them is very disrespectful! I think Spence and Crawford are better than Clottey, Hatton, Mosely, Rios, Algieri (you saw what Spence did to him), and the De La Hoya and Margarito that Manny faced!

[IceTrayDaGang]

First of all Freddie said "Prime Manny" would "WALK" through everybody @ 147 today, yet that same Manny didn't beat Cotto @ 147! Spence and Crawford have thin resumes, but the eye test says Manny would not "WALK" through them! This is all speculation, but for Freddie to say Manny would "WALK" through them is very disrespectful! I think Spence and Crawford are better than Clottey, Hatton, Mosely, Rios, Algieri (you saw what Spence did to him), and the De La Hoya and Margarito that Manny faced!

"your" eye test? LOL!! based on what doe??

you like to bring up manny's opponents to discredit the win and you use that as a reason why pac wouldnt be able to walk thru the current ww's. yet you havent answer me who has spence and crawford beat at 147 for you to make those claims? hypocrite? manny is proven! the fighters i brought up are the fighters manny fought and beat! where as for spence? crickets. cvrawford? crickets.

so now you bringing up what spence did to algieri and that's the reaso nwhy he'll beat manny? did you see what pac did to algieri too? dropped him like 6x. did you see how algieri fought spence different than when he fought manny? i wonder why? and manny was the smaller guy too. i wonder why?

[Bronx2245]

"your" eye test? LOL!! based on what doe??

you like to bring up manny's opponents to discredit the win and you use that as a reason why pac wouldnt be able to walk thru the current ww's. yet you havent answer me who has spence and crawford beat at 147 for you to make those claims? hypocrite? manny is proven! the fighters i brought up are the fighters manny fought and beat! where as for spence? crickets. cvrawford? crickets.

so now you bringing up what spence did to algieri and that's the reaso nwhy he'll beat manny? did you see what pac did to algieri too? dropped him like 6x. did you see how algieri fought spence different than when he fought manny? i wonder why? and manny was the smaller guy too. i wonder why?

Did Manny beat Algieri by KO? Spence stopped him in 5! Manny should've fought Brook a long time ago, but he didn't want that smoke! It's OK, Spence handled that! As far as Crawford is concerned, his skill set is much better than anyone Manny faced, including JMM, so that's why I think he would've beaten the brakes off a "Prime Manny!" Anyway, it's all speculation! Roach's statement is DISRESPECTFUL, and there was no need for him to say it, and no need for us to continue this debate!