Most Prestigious "All-Time" Accolade? "Greatest" (Ali) OR "Most Avoided" (Khan)

**E-Thug** · 10-25-2018, 04:38 PM

Go back to your takeaway shift you dense son of a *****, don't you dare disrespect Ali by comparing the Greatest to that glass chin bum

**Eff Pandas** · 10-25-2018, 04:46 PM

C- troll thread

**FlatLine** · 10-25-2018, 05:32 PM

Originally posted by E-Thug

Go back to your takeaway shift you dense son of a *****, don't you dare disrespect Ali by comparing the Greatest to that glass chin bum

If we remove the idol-worshipping for a moment, they are two people who competed in the same sport with each man splitting perhaps the two most prestigious accolades in boxing between them - The Greatest and The Most Avoided. The question fundamentally asks, which is the most prestigious accolade for a boxer to own, and it's only logical then to pit the two boxers who own each of those accolades against each other. It's not comparing their skill levels as boxers, just the different accolades that belong to them.

**bluebeam** · 10-25-2018, 06:03 PM

Originally posted by FlatLine

With Muhammad Ali being heralded by many as The Greatest of All Time and Khan being justifiably considered The Most Avoided of All Time, which of the two fighters actually possesses the most prestigious "All-Time" accolade?

I voted kell brook

**STREET CLEANER** · 10-25-2018, 06:10 PM

Originally posted by bluebeam

I voted kell brook

LMAO........

**Fists_of_Fury** · 10-25-2018, 06:23 PM

Originally posted by bluebeam

I voted kell brook

Green k

**boliodogs** · 10-25-2018, 10:57 PM

Nobody but you, Khan and maybe a hand full of UK Khan nuts consider him avoided even a little bit. He doesn't get the two giant money fights he has always wanted because he never does a damn thing to earn them. Khan has not been a world champion for over SIX YEARS! Canelo knocked whatever fight was left in Khan completely out of him. Now he only fights ridiculously easy cherry picks and one of them knocked him down and gave him hell. Khan could have had a big money fight with a drained 147 pound Brook but he insisted on a 2nd weigh in to make sure Brook was even more drained as a way out of that fight. Khan was not bad when he was with Roach and he fought good fighters back then. Khan is not nearly as good now as he was then and should not be rated among the top 10 welterweights. Nobody is avoiding Khan. Khan is the one avoiding any top 10 world rated boxer.

**boxinggod101** · 10-26-2018, 12:01 AM

hahahahhahahahhahahahahhahahahahhaha

**kidbazooka** · 10-26-2018, 12:59 AM

Originally posted by FlatLine

If we remove the idol-worshipping for a moment, they are two people who competed in the same sport with each man splitting perhaps the two most prestigious accolades in boxing between them - The Greatest and The Most Avoided. The question fundamentally asks, which is the most prestigious accolade for a boxer to own, and it's only logical then to pit the two boxers who own each of those accolades against each other. It's not comparing their skill levels as boxers, just the different accolades that belong to them.

At first I thought you were trolling but I guess your not.

Wtf is wrong with you khan is not the �most� anything except for maybe the �most� weakest chin ever.

Stop it with this bs.

Most Prestigious "All-Time" Accolade? "Greatest" (Ali) OR "Most Avoided" (Khan)