Originally posted by P4Pdunny
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Canelo Alvarez vs. Rocky Fielding on December 15 at MSG
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by McManus View PostDisclaimer: I am NOT a GGG fan.
I do agree GGG has fought a ton of bums which is why I'm NOT a GGG fan. I did score Jacobs winning as well.
You don't think GGG could have done this at any time? Nobody in this forum even knows who Rocky Fielding is. I'm sure there was another scrub with a strap floating around 168 during GGG's time.
I like to look a bit deeper than what's on paper in relation to Boxing. I mean, that's why we're all here right? With that said, this fight is meaningless because Canelo will never be a real champ at 168.
I’ll tell you why GGG didn’t do it, if he showed he could have gone to 168, someone there would have called his bluff at that weight.
Comment
-
Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Postyou used to behave like a little bltch
you still behave like a little bltch
you will always behave like a little bltch
no skin off my nose
it is hilarious that you are too scared to debate me
Comment
-
Originally posted by aboutfkntime View PostSPOT QUIZ:
the following fighters are ranked higher at 168 than Fielding.....
Smith
Ramirez
Benavidez
Uzcategui
Groves
Degale
Dirrell
Eubank
considering that fact, would it be correct to refer to Canelo as a 168 "champion" should be beat Fielding.....?
btw, the possible answers are..... yes, or no
the answer to that question is LITERALLY as yes, or no..... as the answer to whether Golovkin's title defence run was legitimate
yes, or no ?
i like how this is being ignored to death by pretty much everyone who is saying this is a bad fight
Comment
-
Don’t really know Fielding. Hope it’s a good fight and on fee espn because I’m not paying for a ppv.
Comment
-
I too was caught off guard and dumbfounded by the announcement.... here’s my take though. 1- Canelo looking for a soft touch after the GgG fight, 2- ddnt want to go through another grueling camp to get back down to 160 after having just fought anticipate he’ll weigh in around 166 or so 3- they don’t look at Lemieux as a soft touch especially after having a tough close fight with GGG expect Lemieux in May.. or maybe just maybe a possible catch weight fight with Zurdo.. anyway these are just my first opinions on the announcement I may be wrong as ****. Also I don’t like the idea of such a quick turnaround fight for Canrlo. It’s thise dark horse fighters that worry me. Hope Canelo doesn’t regret the decision. With that said canelo by KO
Comment
-
Originally posted by Illmatic94 View PostIm not a lilg nutthugger. but just being consistent. when Golovkin was regular the full champ who was I think Sturm wanted no parts of him. I'm not gonna fault Golovkin for being ducked. in this scenario Canelo is moving up and facing a low tier 168lber for a meaningless belt when he could've just faced Smith and made a bigger statement.
my issue is the posters saying "Canelo doing what GGG never did" as if Golovkin would get ANY credit for fighting Fielding? he wouldn't.
but its a voluntary aka cherry pick so i dont care. I actually made a thread a while back asking why is Golovkin title defences so high when he was just regular champ.
jesus...... stop making ridiculous excuses for Hypekin loooool
FACT: it is exactly the same..... a lesser title that should not be taken seriously
GTFOH
Comment
-
Originally posted by McManus View PostDisclaimer: I am NOT a GGG fan.
I do agree GGG has fought a ton of bums which is why I'm NOT a GGG fan. I did score Jacobs winning as well.
You don't think GGG could have done this at any time? Nobody in this forum even knows who Rocky Fielding is. I'm sure there was another scrub with a strap floating around 168 during GGG's time.
I like to look a bit deeper than what's on paper in relation to Boxing. I mean, that's why we're all here right? With that said, this fight is meaningless because Canelo will never be a real champ at 168.
then.....
Q. why didn't he ?
A. because the Monroe's, Wade's, Brook's and Vanes'..... were EASIER
Comment
-
Comment