Comments Thread For: WBC Grants Canelo Voluntary Defense, Then Charlo-Golovkin Winner

[UNBIASED BOXING]

Lmao, ofc the WBC wants to protect Canelo. Funny how they backtrack on mandatories when its Canelo.

[Butch.McRae]

Charlo is a better fight than murata so I won't be defending it

Fair enough. We gotta keep it clean here lol This HBO ordeal has created some interesting times.

[boxing90]

Im starting not to like the WBC sanction.

[Boksfan]

WBC is a mess.

[kidbazooka]

Pretty sure Golovkin will duck charlo.

He’ll look to fight another bum instead but canelo should make him earn it this time.

[j0zef]

It is unlikely that the 36-year-old Golovkin would fight the unbeaten Charlo before boxing Alvarez a third time. If the WBC insisted on Charlo-Golovkin taking place prior to a third Alvarez-Golovkin fight, Alvarez simply could vacate the WBC middleweight title again and box Golovkin.

I would laugh my ass of after all the d1ck sucking WBC did, Alvarez vacated the WBC again.

[dannnnn]

So the champion gets a soft-touch and the challengers have to face top competition. Shouldn't it be the other way around? This is why boxing is ****ed up.

[Ajvar]

GGG ducked Derev so he surely ducks Charlo too.

[kidbazooka]

So the champion gets a soft-touch and the challengers have to face top competition. Shouldn't it be the other way around? This is why boxing is ****ed up.

Are you fuucking kidding me GGG has had 18 soft touches already for fuucks sake, how about have him fight an actual live opponent this time instead of just gifted another crack at the title.

[Mammoth]

Huh? Charlo has to fight an eliminator, a final eliminator and a super final eliminator now?