Originally posted by Bobby Shaw
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: WBC Grants Canelo Voluntary Defense, Then Charlo-Golovkin Winner
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by dannnnn View PostI'm simply a boxing fan who wants to see the best fights. I would love to see Golovkin vs. Charlo, or any combination of Canelo/Golovkin/Saunders/Jacobs-Derevyanchenko winner/Charlo fighting each other. ANY of those fights would be welcome to me. Canelo-Lemieux isn't one of them. It's a pointless fight, allowed due to preferential treatment from the WBC.
But I wouldn't expect you to understand that. You're not a boxing fan- you're just a fanboy of certain fighters and a pure hater of others. You're the equivalent of that child in the playground arguing to all his friends that Superman is better than Batman and will say literally anything to suit your agenda. In short: you're pathetic. And I think any true boxing fan on here can see that.
And Batman beats superman cuz Batman is smart....LMMFAO!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Muz View PostExactly, fighting once a year vs bums like Centeno and Heikand on pbc is all Charlo is known for. Another protected African American boxer with no guts or integrity, getting favored because the wbc caters to haymon.
Ggg knocks out Charlo because Charlo is extremely easy to hit and has no punch resistance or heart to hang against a killer like ggg even past his prime.
In case you're two dum to realise what this means I'll tell you.
Heiland was being saved to be another one of GGG's bum mandatory defenses, but Charlo ruined those plans by moving up and persuing that mandatory position.
Why you think Sanchez was so angry and defensive when asked about fighting the new mandatory Charlo?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Fangedgrowl View PostDude i am not a fan of GGG or Canelo. Just call it like i see it. The 160 pound Charlo is not as good as the 154 pounder. He is number one contender , but he is not ready for a fighter like Canelo or GGG to me. et him fight Saunders -Andrade winner or whoever is fighting Andrade now.
If Brook was able to lift GGG off his feet TWICE and put that much hand on him what you think Charlo will do?
Plus, the 154 pound Charlo aint better than the 160 pound Charlo what are you on drugs or something?
Comment
-
Originally posted by kafkod View PostThat's what the article is saying could happen, and if it does, the WBC will be to blame.
Charlo is mandatory for the WBC title, and Canelo is the WBC champion now, not Golovkin .. so why the heck are the WBC saying that Charlo has to beat GGG to get a shot at Canelo?
That's very unfair to Jermall ... and very convenient for Canelo.
What they should have said is that if Canelo has a voluntary defence before his mando, it has to be against GGG, with Charlo fighting the winner.
But the WBC are corrupt, as everybody knows.
All I want to see NEXT is Jermall vs golovkin!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Diego Rodriguez View PostOr Charlo could just face the champion since he is the number one challenger.
Again if Golovkin fights Charlo great. But the WBC is ridiculous. Fine give Canelo a pay day fight, no problem with that he deserved it no matter what I thought of the decision. But his mandatory should be either Golovkin (due to the controversy of the fight) or Charlo as the number one.
But regardless Canelo and Golovkin will decide what they want to do. Canelo already ditched the belt once so I doubt all of the sudden he is going to listen to them. If he wants to fight Golovkin it will happen.
Don't you get it.
If the wbc ordered GGG vs Charlo it is because Canelo told em he aint interested in a 3rd fight right now/or ever.
Ordering GGG vs Charlo is way for them to allow Canelo to cherry pick while having Charlo get rid of the GGG problem for him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Shadoww702 View PostAre you one of those clowns who thinks you cant break up with chicks??? *** you probably been with the same fat ho since kindergarten who is your actual cousin.
Sht happens ppl breakup and get divorce ALL the time.
You aint right in the head??? Who the *** comes up with some twisred ass fantasies like you have??? You really jack off to dude gang ****ing your cousin wife???? Then you go eat her out...
NASTY!
And you STILL dont know sht about boxing! LMFAO you took GGG by TKO BOTH times. Even said EASY TKO the 1st fight
Comment
-
Originally posted by bigdunny1 View PostWhat a load of horse shyt. So now Lemieux is old or some how shop worn? He would still be 29 in December stop that he is not old not washed up he is simply 1 dimensional and limited JUST LIKE HE WAS when GGG fought him coming off 2 HORRIBLE losses already in his career that he never even tried to avenge. And he won 9 straight after his losses but you left out that they were almost virtually all against bums in canada of those 9 fights only 1 of which were even a top 30 ranked 160lber. So he got exposed badly fought bums got a ranking then fell into a vacant championship fight. Since he fought GGG he's actually beaten more top ranked Middleweights then he did BEFORE GGG. His wins over Stevens, Spike, Tapia, Reyes > Rosado, Ndam, and a bag of crap he fought during that 9 win streak. No wonder you a GGG fan and don't know shyt about boxing. All you do is look at the record and don't look at the names and quality of the opponents. Let me get this straight even though we have benefit of history and know exactly the caliber fighter Lemeiux is and he had terrible losses BEFORE GGG and AFTER GGG somehow the same caliber fighter he's consistently always been means he is mysteriously a B level opponent for GGG because you sprinkle magic GGG bum sauce on him but the moment he fights ANYONE else including Canelo he transforms back into a C level bum? LMAO
You hypocrite azzz bytches. Can't even keep your story straight about Lemieux who despite the rest of your fairy tales is GGG's second best win on his entire trash resume.
FACT GGG didn't beat Canelo
FACT you don't get credit for imaginary wins you think GGG would of gotten if he fought this guy or that guy. Hell you the same clown who predicted and knew for a fact he would KO Canelo LMAO So naming fighters he didn't fight who you think he might of beat don't mean shyt because he didn't fight them.
FACT the only fighter GGG beat that is better then Lemieux is Jacobs so let that sink in. If Lemieux is a bum like you called him in this thread then GGG only beat fighters worse then bums. If Lemieux is a C list fighter then 37 of GGG's 38 wins were against D list fighters. Spin that however you want bytch it won't change a thing.
Comment
-
Comment