1. "Just rehydration" makes sense since he was dehydrated. Unless he was using the IV to administer medication. But he used the IV to rehydrate. Pretty ****** of you to keep posting this.
2. Floyd never said giving urine and blood made him dehydrated. That's a lie. In fact Floyd never confirmed any medical condition that could have CAUSED the dehydration. He has only stated old age and training help contribute to he dehydrated state.
1. Floyd gave a partial sample IMMEDIATELY BEFORE using the IV in the presence of the DCO.
2. WADA RULES instruct the labs to ignore the decision limit and threshold of a threshold substance if it is known by the lab that a masking agent was used. Kills your dilution threshold conspiracy completely.
False. WADA rules permit retro TUES for obvious reasons such as there is no way to predict acute medical concerns.
WADA rules list conditions in which a retro TUE may be granted. Medical emergency is only ONE of them.
Remember when you claimed "or" really meant "and"?
More importantly, no one knows Floyd's the medical condition and all you have is speculation. Last I checked speculation is not a fact.
What's evident is USADA and the TUEC was satisfied with the events that transpired and granted the TUE.
You are making most of it up - just like when you're intentionally misquoting people. Or offering speculation as fact. Or spreading misinformation. Or coming to conclusions based on rumors.
The head of WADA TUEC stated he did not know the "details" surrounding Floyd's IV. It would make logical sense to conclude that there are "details" that would justify the IV. OR ELSE HE WOULD NOT HAVE SAID I DO NOT THE THE DETAILS before offering his expertise.
2. Floyd never said giving urine and blood made him dehydrated. That's a lie. In fact Floyd never confirmed any medical condition that could have CAUSED the dehydration. He has only stated old age and training help contribute to he dehydrated state.
Floyd's bag too could have contained anything including something that can help mask and is undetectable. Who knows!
2. WADA RULES instruct the labs to ignore the decision limit and threshold of a threshold substance if it is known by the lab that a masking agent was used. Kills your dilution threshold conspiracy completely.
BUT what Floyd did is illegal as per the rules.
There was no emergency! Even later when Floyd had time to think about it, he still didn't say that it was a medical emergency! Did not mention that he had diarrhea …. and if he did, why was his weight rock solid stable? You ever had severe diarrhea? You lose a ton of weight!!!!!
Remember when you claimed "or" really meant "and"?
More importantly, no one knows Floyd's the medical condition and all you have is speculation. Last I checked speculation is not a fact.
What's evident is USADA and the TUEC was satisfied with the events that transpired and granted the TUE.
but as stated, he said "just rehydration"!!!! you can't make this sh$$t up! It was just to recover from dehydration but his weight was OK and he was to notify the NSAC if it was a serious medical condition. Even Showtime's Epilogue mentions this when they knew only about Manny's shoulder injury but had yet to know about Floyd! So rules apply only to others not Floyd?
HBO?
The head of WADA TUEC Committee and who is also a doctor too agrees with me that Floyd should not have received an IV and if he did, then it would mean that he would be in no condition to fight Manny!!!!
The head of WADA TUEC Committee and who is also a doctor too agrees with me that Floyd should not have received an IV and if he did, then it would mean that he would be in no condition to fight Manny!!!!
The head of WADA TUEC stated he did not know the "details" surrounding Floyd's IV. It would make logical sense to conclude that there are "details" that would justify the IV. OR ELSE HE WOULD NOT HAVE SAID I DO NOT THE THE DETAILS before offering his expertise.
Comment