Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Fury To Wilder: I'm No Challenger, I'm The Lineal Champion!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Is there an actual belt, or any other type of physical accolade for being "lineal" champ? I've always considered it as nothing more than a bragging rights thing.
    Yes nobody beat Fury for him to lose his titles but the same can be said of Lewis who retired as "lineal" Champ, does that not mean the "lineal" title was retired with him? As impressively as Fury nullified Klitschko, and as amazing a career as Klitschko had, neither could truly be called the "lineal" Champ.
    I'm sure the line must have been broken a couple of times before Lewis was considered "lineal" champ as well. Is the title really worth anything as it is now literally impossible to be the man who beat the man, who beat the man, etc all the way back to the original "lineal" champ.

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by Robbie Barrett View Post
      Someone that was banned for 2 years for steroids forfeits the right to be called lineal champ IMO.
      Evander Holyfield fights against Tyson do not count then he was on steroids

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by Robbie Barrett View Post
        Someone that was banned for 2 years for steroids forfeits the right to be called lineal champ IMO.
        Yea.. but it doesn't work that way. The lineal champion can only lose his title in the ring.

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by Adamsc151 View Post
          Is there an actual belt, or any other type of physical accolade for being "lineal" champ? I've always considered it as nothing more than a bragging rights thing.
          Yes nobody beat Fury for him to lose his titles but the same can be said of Lewis who retired as "lineal" Champ, does that not mean the "lineal" title was retired with him? As impressively as Fury nullified Klitschko, and as amazing a career as Klitschko had, neither could truly be called the "lineal" Champ.
          I'm sure the line must have been broken a couple of times before Lewis was considered "lineal" champ as well. Is the title really worth anything as it is now literally impossible to be the man who beat the man, who beat the man, etc all the way back to the original "lineal" champ.
          Universally recognised #1 vs #2 establishes a new lineal. But Wlad's lineal status is questionable which in turn made Fury's. Wlad never beat #2, his brother was #2. Being banned for 2 years for steroids makes anyone claiming Fury is still lineal a ****ing idiot.

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by 5000boxing View Post
            Yea.. but it doesn't work that way. The lineal champion can only lose his title in the ring.
            If that's the case Lennox Lewis is still lineal.

            Comment


            • #16
              Fury lost the lineal because he retired (his words) if that didn't strip him , then Lennox who retired as well is still lineal.

              Originally posted by el*** View Post
              Fury lost his boxing license for testing positive for steroids. He lost his belts from the inactivity and he fought two cans this year that would never qualify as defenses for any ABC belt.

              Fury is not the lineal Champion. He used to be 2016. Before we knew he used steroids in the lead up to the wlad fight. Even his win over wlad is in question. He is lucky they didnt change it to a NC.

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by Robbie Barrett View Post
                If that's the case Lennox Lewis is still lineal.
                Lmao.. technically yes.. but it holds no weight.. Klitchsko ran the division for 6 years.. fury was the man who dethroned him. No lennox.. not to mention everytime the man says something real about AJ yawl discredit him an call him a Canadian! Lmao.. u.k fans are weird!

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by Robbie Barrett View Post
                  Universally recognised #1 vs #2 establishes a new lineal. But Wlad's lineal status is questionable which in turn made Fury's. Wlad never beat #2, his brother was #2. Being banned for 2 years for steroids makes anyone claiming Fury is still lineal a ****ing idiot.
                  I'll take that reasoning, so the winner of this fight can only be considered the lineal champ if they also beat Joshua as well (and I'd make AJ the favourite against either at the moment) - unless someone else beats him 1st which I think is doubtful with the current crop of contenders, but you can never be sure at HW.
                  Lets hope Joshua can lure the winner to Wembley in April, however Wilder at least will have a rematch clause in case of losing. I can't give any credibility to the rumours that Wilder-Fury is a 2 fight deal regardless of the result in December; surely no champ would ever agree to that for a simple defence against a non-belt holder - regardless of who the challenger might be.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by Robbie Barrett View Post
                    He was still banned for 2 years for steroids. That is worthy of stripping to any reasonable person. Does any of the popular ranking sites recognise him as lineal?
                    Problem is - the opinions of people on boxing forums or “popular ranking sites” are merely opinions and don’t count for anything.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by frosty-g View Post
                      Problem is - the opinions of people on boxing forums or “popular ranking sites” are merely opinions and don’t count for anything.
                      Well that's all lineal is an opinion, there's no official title.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP