Comments Thread For: The Boxing World Should Take Tyson Fury Seriously
Collapse
-
Many fighters, especially hard hitters, tend to lose effectiveness when they see things not going their way.
But in truth I myself think that one punch by Wilder is all it takes to end the Fury fight. If it really happens, that is...Comment
-
Of course it's a valid hypothesis. We just don't know how effective Wilder would still be in the "bamboozled" condition.
Many fighters, especially hard hitters, tend to lose effectiveness when they see things not going their way.
But in truth I myself think that one punch by Wilder is all it takes to end the Fury fight. If it really happens, that is...
Also, Wilder has a great jab that he rarely utilizes, and barely got used at all in his last fight due to the southpaw factor, but he won the WBC championship on using that jab for 12 roundsComment
-
Honestly, if Fury starts as slowly as he did in his last fight (walk back, arm on rope, not like a fight just started) Wilder will land his one-two in the opening of the first round. He can cover a ring in an instant and that cannon is a snipe shot down the pipe. If Fury however is on form though both are in for a long night and it will be interesting.Comment
-
Absolutely true. He dominated Stiverne with the jab exclusively. He could decide of jabbing Fury silly first, then lower the bomb (fifth scenario?)Comment
-
Wilder has never faced someone as big or quick as Fury
Fury has never faced someone as big or quick or strong as Wilder
Fury is so awkward and hard to hit, Wilder is patient and hit's and drops everyone.
i don't see why so many are hating.Comment
-
Comment
-
"I learned long ago that the more talented of two combatants usually wins. And Fury might be the more talented than Wilder, who remains a work in progress. Fury might be too skillful and clever for Wilder, which could more than compensate for whatever advantages Wilder might have."
Anybody writing about professional sport should be able to distinguish between skill and talent. Wilder somehow still being a "work in progress" (after 40 odd fights) explains his lack of skill but has nothing to do with his lack of talent. He's a bloody awful fighter who's only got away with it for this long due to the atrocious level of competition he's faced, and his power. He's an embarrassment.Comment
-
Comes with A: 60% possibility that he is able to upset Wilder.
Comes with B: Then what I quoted from Rexy comes into play. (IMO)
Comes with anything below that easy night for Wilder and goodnight Tyson Fury.
Yes. That is how I feel as well brother.Last edited by BoxingB4Pride; 09-30-2018, 03:59 PM.Comment
-
"I learned long ago that the more talented of two combatants usually wins. And Fury might be the more talented than Wilder, who remains a work in progress. Fury might be too skillful and clever for Wilder, which could more than compensate for whatever advantages Wilder might have."
Anybody writing about professional sport should be able to distinguish between skill and talent. Wilder somehow still being a "work in progress" (after 40 odd fights) explains his lack of skill but has nothing to do with his lack of talent. He's a bloody awful fighter who's only got away with it for this long due to the atrocious level of competition he's faced, and his power. He's an embarrassment.Comment
Comment