The case for floyd higher on ATG list than Duran

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • djtmal
    Undisputed Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Apr 2008
    • 12271
    • 1,200
    • 11
    • 39,097

    #61
    Here's to the never ending battle to get the naysayers to respect Floyd's career.

    Comment

    • buddyr
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Feb 2014
      • 5041
      • 1,286
      • 350
      • 34,653

      #62
      Originally posted by THEFRESHBRAWLER




      The thing is with BoxRec they actually count losses in their metrics compared to the average fan who thinks losses don’t matter because of the fighters previous level of competition. You cant just excuses all his losses just because he fought tough competition like Hagler Barkley and Hearns. What would be the point of fighting and keeping fighters W-L record if you can just say “that loss doesn’t matter” everytime one of your favorite fighters lose? In reference to Duran, he had nearly 20 losses. How fair would it be to the fighters that beat him to say those losses don’t matter?
      That list is some certified bs. haha. It has to be the funniest thing I've ever seen in my life

      Comment

      • ADP02
        Champ
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Apr 2010
        • 13617
        • 415
        • 1
        • 26,360

        #63
        Originally posted by pretty boy_
        Sorry but anybody that has no mas ranked higher than pbf needs to get their head checked.
        Floyd did "NO MAS" by not even entering the ring on multiple occasions!!! That is, he didn't even want to fight some fighters when he should have fought them!

        Comment

        • ADP02
          Champ
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Apr 2010
          • 13617
          • 415
          • 1
          • 26,360

          #64
          Originally posted by larryxxx..
          Berto??? Jmm those are not his best wins


          Manny
          Oscar
          Hatton
          Corrales
          Castillo
          Canelo
          Cotto
          Mosley
          Hernendez

          THEN

          Jmm
          Maidana
          Ortiz
          Guerrero
          Judah
          Berto
          Gatti
          Manfredy


          The TS had only 1 fighter for Duran yet you came to the rescue for your hero Floyd!

          You made me laugh Larryxxx, so all is good!


          .

          Comment

          • CodeBreaker
            Interim Champion
            Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
            • May 2017
            • 526
            • 21
            • 50
            • 14,112

            #65
            Nostalgia = denial

            Floyd is definitely above Duran

            Comment

            • Japanese Boxing
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Apr 2012
              • 1349
              • 67
              • 6
              • 8,895

              #66
              Originally posted by djtmal
              Here's to the never ending battle to get the naysayers to respect Floyd's career.
              I'll never understand how someone could say something so ignorant. People who know the history of the sport and understand the fighters and the era are going to be comparing eras and do their best judge accordingly. Anyone who has studied for followed that era understands that was the prime for the lower weight classes. It's pretty much unanimous. That doesn't mean they think Floyd isn't an all time great or isn't one of the best. They just don't put him in the same class as other fighters because his competition was much weaker.

              Comment

              • E-Thug
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Jan 2010
                • 2162
                • 209
                • 419
                • 26,296

                #67
                Originally posted by DARKSEID
                You have no idea what you're talking about.

                Floyd would have beat Iran barkley at 160?

                Floyd would have beat Tommy Hearns? No ****ing way. There is no ****ing way Floyd beats hearns.

                Floyd would have beat Hagler? Sugar Ray leonard?

                Maybe you should stop posting.
                Originally posted by SniXSniPe
                Duran coming up to 147 and beating Leonard is a feat greater than anything Floyd has accomplished.
                Originally posted by chrisJS
                So you have Calzaghe, Ottke, Lopez, Marciano, Barry ahead of Armstrong and every other boxer with that many losses? Ottke over Robinson? Wow.
                Originally posted by djtmal
                Here's to the never ending battle to get the naysayers to respect Floyd's career.
                The problem with these modern era fans is they've literally never watched boxing or bothered to research about it in any way, shape or form. They became fans in like 2011/2012 and Mayweather and Pacquaio are all they know. They know sweet **** all else. You can't help ******ed people like this

                Originally posted by Japanese Boxing
                I'll never understand how someone could say something so ignorant. People who know the history of the sport and understand the fighters and the era are going to be comparing eras and do their best judge accordingly. Anyone who has studied for followed that era understands that was the prime for the lower weight classes. It's pretty much unanimous. That doesn't mean they think Floyd isn't an all time great or isn't one of the best. They just don't put him in the same class as other fighters because his competition was much weaker.
                Because recency bias = denial

                Comment

                • DreamerUSA
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Feb 2015
                  • 2302
                  • 171
                  • 40
                  • 32,933

                  #68
                  Originally posted by THEFRESHBRAWLER




                  The thing is with BoxRec they actually count losses in their metrics compared to the average fan who thinks losses don’t matter because of the fighters previous level of competition. You cant just excuses all his losses just because he fought tough competition like Hagler Barkley and Hearns. What would be the point of fighting and keeping fighters W-L record if you can just say “that loss doesn’t matter” everytime one of your favorite fighters lose? In reference to Duran, he had nearly 20 losses. How fair would it be to the fighters that beat him to say those losses don’t matter?

                  The simple answer is that losing a fight doesn't undo what you have previously accomplished. The fact is, Duran could of rode off into the sunset as a legend after beating SRL. Whatever happened after that doesn't change that fact. Everything he accomplished after that is just icing on the cake.

                  Comment

                  • Fangedgrowl
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Mar 2014
                    • 2111
                    • 126
                    • 0
                    • 27,903

                    #69
                    Originally posted by DreamerUSA
                    The simple answer is that losing a fight doesn't undo what you have previously accomplished. The fact is, Duran could of rode off into the sunset as a legend after beating SRL. Whatever happened after that doesn't change that fact. Everything he accomplished after that is just icing on the cake.
                    Who is recognized as the greatest pound for pound fighter. Sugar Ray Robinson, yes he lost fights. However he fought alot of tough competition. He didnt duck anyone or wait them to age. This boxing rec stuff isn the end all to be all. Other people said it too. You have to look at eras. Floyd went to welterweight right after Oscar, Shane, Felix, Fernando, Ike quartey, Winky at 154, Margarito, a young cotto. ETC. However i cant fault him either. He was a 130 pounder when they were in their primes. So it is not always comparable.

                    Comment

                    • chrisJS
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Mar 2007
                      • 8989
                      • 331
                      • 64
                      • 78,477

                      #70
                      Originally posted by THEFRESHBRAWLER




                      The thing is with BoxRec they actually count losses in their metrics compared to the average fan who thinks losses don’t matter because of the fighters previous level of competition. You cant just excuses all his losses just because he fought tough competition like Hagler Barkley and Hearns. What would be the point of fighting and keeping fighters W-L record if you can just say “that loss doesn’t matter” everytime one of your favorite fighters lose? In reference to Duran, he had nearly 20 losses. How fair would it be to the fighters that beat him to say those losses don’t matter?
                      That’s actually the worst list I’ve ever seen. I mean, De La Hoya over Leonard, no Jofre, no Walker, Pep at 48 and Greb at 18 lol. Patterson lol. I could pick apart that list all day It’s so bad. Even Marquez, my all-time favorite fighter in the top 20 is way too high and a clearly awful ranking.
                      Last edited by chrisJS; 10-01-2018, 11:32 AM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP