Why do people think Paul Williams had ANY chance against Floyd?

[j.razor]

Margarito with his bricks would've made the woman beater *Floyd go to his knees like he does for Ellerbe and 50

Exposing yourself to not know margarito had plaster in his wraps, was a punching bag, jim lampley is a woman beater & you talk gay about other people so what does that say about you? LMMFAO!

[j.razor]

Keep on winning? That doesnt make any sense considering most of Floyd's opponats had been beat to a pulp just before he got them

You are exposing yourself like hbo cuz Floyd was fighting people after they were on winning streaks. Pacquiao was the one fighting people who were losing fights....LMMFAO!

[j.razor]

Like I said it doesn’t matter who’s fault. They didn’t happen during their primes. So I’m not gonna give some imaginary credit to the winner like they did.

His best win against an absolute prime opponent is against Corrales.
And I like Floyd, but that’s just being objective.

We can also search in youtube where Floyd was absolutely shook when he talked to Marg making it a very funny vid. (Eventhough i believed Floyd would beat him had they fought.)
Have you watched it? If you didn’t find it funny or u gonna chang the subj about it then you’re just a fanboy like I’ve always thought.

I seen the video & it looked like one of bob's workers was trying to make Floyd look bad but Floyd told him to bring something to the table & not his 4 losses he had at the time....LOL....ALL this talk is just ways to try to discredit T.B.E.

[j.razor]

LOL! Dull razor you never fail in being a failure.

Now stop hogging the library computer because you can’t afford a cell phone or your own computer. Poor kids got homework to do.

Your the consistent failure. You had pacquiao, kell, kovalev, Triple L & hbo….LMMFAO!

[j.razor]

Floyd knew that it would have been a tough fight.

They were both promoted by AL Haymon.


Floyd fans kept on telling us that the Manny fight wasn't made due to the promoters but here is a fight that Floyd never looked for but was right in front of him.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G4fEFOoaBfs

[j.razor]

Paul Williams had the reach, height and work rate that would have made it very difficult for a fighter like Floyd that preferred to fight them slow plodders with low work rate and low stamina.

This comment makes no sense....

[j.razor]

Canelo said it BEFORE the fight that the hardest thing during his whole training camp was trying to make weight!

Then why was he the one that asked for 152?

[j.razor]

Prime Floyd boxes rings around both guys.

A fighter cant fight everyone but it sure gives the haters a long list of ducks lol .

There are more fighters Floyd has called out or try to work a deal with to fight....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jO1F4A4baE8

[j.razor]

Tommy Hearns is an all time great, and I am from Michigan and got to see him fight live. One of my all time favorites for sure. Hearns is one of those fighters that people lionize over time though, you are correct in stating that he didn't have a ton of great fighters on his resume. But he does have a few legends. And he probably beat Sugar Ray Leonard in that 2nd fight.

Best wins were Duran and Benitez at 154. I think Floyd was better than either at 154. What Hearns had though was one of the best jabs around, and that reach. He would give Floyd a lot of problems, but Mayweather beat him 8-4 or 7-5.

I think Sugar Ray Leonard is the one that beats Mayweather at 147, because he was just as versatile and bigger.

Leonard was 27-0 then lost his 1st fight to Duran. Floyd would of made easy work of Duran. I think Floyd would of been too smart for Leonard. No one wants to give Floyd credit especially favor him over old boxers in fantasy match ups. When I look back at the old footage it reminds me of how hbo hypes up certain fighters only to end up failing. Witnessing all that & hearing all the B.S. I say Floyd is T.B.E.

[sunny31]

How about YOU give us a link to Floyd talking about him. We'll wait.

Go find the Ra Rugged Man interview, I have zero interest in proving something which is fairly common knowledge.