Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Golovkin's Coach: Kellerman is One of The Most Biased on TV!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Lampley is a K.O. fanboy he always gets excited for the aggressive hard punching K.O. artists. He rides Canelos d!k whenever hes fighting anyone other than Golovkin. Roy my favorite fighter of all time, sometimes makes outrageous claims that leave you scratching your head. Max, to me, always seemed to be the most level headed out of the 3 I can recall many times where he disagreed with Roy, Jim and Harold whenever theyd say some outlandish *****tt. he always disagrees with harolds card unless the fights a shut out. But I've noticed him becoming more and more of a company man. Which is a shame cuz he actually does know his stuff. I'll never forget when he said Floyd was afraid to give Pac a rematch because Floyd knew Pac would knock him out the next time. I cringed so hard.

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by dannnnn View Post
      He's right though, Kellerman was terribly biased in this fight in favour of Canelo and was irritating on commentary with his whole "story of the fight" nonsense.
      That was a way for Kellerman to play both sides of the fence when what he really wanted to say is GGG is getting phuked up and running from a Mexican Style fight he begged for. But he couldn't just say that and throw GGG under the bus after him and HBO spent years building up GGG in the first place. He let Sanchez saying over and over in the corner. If anything Max saved for for GGG by using Canelo is winning the "Story of the Fight" LMAO

      Comment


      • #43
        i remember when kellerman kept pushing the inaccurate narrative that roman got robbed in first fight against rung

        after rung knocked him out in rematch, 2 of his 4 questions were about the controversy of the first fight

        absolutely ridiculous lol

        Comment


        • #44
          This is hilarious

          Yet no ggg fan here finds lampley biased just because he was cheering ggg right?

          Lampley is hands down the biggest cheerleader in boxing but conveniently Sanchez had no real issue with him lol

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by Cigar View Post
            Kellerman was completely biased against GGG in that fight. He has always been a company guy, and it was better business for HBO to have Canelo (who was on his last contractual fight) win.
            Yet lampley wasn’t biased right? Lol

            He was calling ***** for ggg that was never there lol

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by j.razor View Post
              Triple L clearly didn't win the fight so what does it matter? LMMFAO!
              Canelo doesn't win any big fight clearly. Unless you count c level guys like khan, Smith and Chavez jr. Canelo should have 4 losses on his record which he would have if judges weren't so easily "influenced" to give him rounds he doesn't deserve.

              Comment


              • #47
                Kellerman does a lot of name dropping during his commentary in an effort to show how much he knows about boxing history and while he can name fights and dates from the past, his actual knowledge and insight into a fight as it's happening is quite poor. How many times have we heard Max directly contradict or question insightful comments from Emmanuel Steward or Roy Jones only to apologize later in the fight when he finally sees what they saw rounds earlier.
                I used to like Jim Lampley's commentating but lately he seems to have his own personal agenda and automatically reacts enthusiastically when the fighter he wants to win lands one punch. HBO have squandered their legacy as the premium network for boxing and is now a shadow of its former self.
                I don't always agree with Bob Arum but he was right to pull out with this Peter Nelson guy at the helm. Based on how downhill HBO Boxing has gone in the last couple of years, Nelson should be held personally responsible for the decline.

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by Jab jab boom View Post
                  Canelo doesn't win any big fight clearly. Unless you count c level guys like khan, Smith and Chavez jr. Canelo should have 4 losses on his record which he would have if judges weren't so easily "influenced" to give him rounds he doesn't deserve.
                  HAHAHA look at GGG record nothing but bums and the moment he stopped fighting bums he got his face broken by the little man Mexican Style.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by kidbazooka View Post
                    Yet lampley wasn’t biased right? Lol

                    He was calling ***** for ggg that was never there lol
                    Yep. They are both bias as hell. It's bad for boxing either way.

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by Jab jab boom View Post
                      Canelo doesn't win any big fight clearly. Unless you count c level guys like khan, Smith and Chavez jr. Canelo should have 4 losses on his record which he would have if judges weren't so easily "influenced" to give him rounds he doesn't deserve.
                      Denial is not healthy.

                      You ggg fanboys need to learn to accept reality.

                      Your monster got fooooked up.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP