Comments Thread For: Canelo-Golovkin - No Robbery, Embrace The Fight For What it Was

[Mexican_Puppet]

Nelo won both fights according to most fighters including me.

All sports are corrupt its how they gave Triple L the draw in the 1st fight & gave him the W over Jacobs.

Exactly

Majority of fans does not know **** about this.

[TJ highway]

Real boxing aficionado like me! Us true boxing fans know Canelo won! Go cry somewhere else about your favorite fighter being “robbed.”

The problem is fan boy want's to pretend like the first fight never happened!


I hope Adalaide Byrd made a boat load of money and ruined her name in doing so!

[harry-greb]

Teddy atlas shudda gone to specsavers.
I had it to canelo by a point. There was 3 or 4 tight rounds. No problem with a draw or a point for ggg.
But 117-112 for ggg is ridiculous.

[Jab jab boom]

crybaby.....

two of Golovkin's 3 best performances have asterisks

just saying lol

if that's the case, Canelo has 4-5 asterisks on his record. Let's just agree that you don't know boxing and are inferior to me. This is why you reduce yourself to name calling and memes/gifs like a 12 yr old girl on snap chat.

[mawoodhouse]

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[mawoodhouse]

Man, you don't know sh.it about boxing

Obviously you dont if you think differently or are just a Canelo ****rider. GGG won both...ask the majority who think the same.

[aboutfkntime]

What would have been a robbery if someone scored the fight 118-110 (like Adelaide Byrd in the first fight) for either fighter. That would be the definition of a robbery.
==============

No, that would be the definition of an unsophisticated boxing fan. Whether you steal a dollar or a million dollars-its a robbery. Robbing subtly to avoid the Byrd-like controversy of the first fight is still a robbery. When a wrongly scored round results in belts changing hands - that's a robbery. The 12th round was won by GGG as clearly as the 12th round of their first fight was won by Canelo. So yes, GGG was robbed and got his legacy ruined by unfair decision. Draw in the first fight was also a robbery, but there was no serious damage done because GGG retained his belts.

why does his legacy depend on one fight ?

if Mayweather was robbed, his legacy would not be ruined

if Pacquiao was robbed, his legacy would not be ruined

if Canelo was robbed, his legacy would not be ruined

so, why is Golovkin's legacy ruined..... ?


1) even Sanchez admitted that Golovkin did not win that fight




2) Sanchez also admitted that Golovkin does not care about legacy




if Golovkin's legacy is ruined, it is because he did not create one

we told you guys Golovkin needed to take the fights he avoided

[aboutfkntime]

if that's the case, Canelo has 4-5 asterisks on his record. Let's just agree that you don't know boxing and are inferior to me. This is why you reduce yourself to name calling and memes/gifs like a 12 yr old girl on snap chat.

you don't know shlt about boxing kid, thats why you just took another L

[Jab jab boom]

you don't know shlt about boxing kid, thats why you just took another L

I don't take Ls, I hand em out to don't know s*** about boxing posers like yourself.

[aboutfkntime]

I don't take Ls, I hand em out to don't know s*** about boxing posers like yourself.

oh really..... ?

what about this dumb shlt.....

Canelo would never dare fight Golovkin, he duckin

Canelo would get KTFO if he grew some balls and fought Golovkin

clen doe

his stamina suxx doe

he small at the weighin doe

the muppet section of boxingscene has talked some DUMB shlt lol

take your L like a man, bltch LMAO