At least in the heavyweight division.
How is it that UK fighters make way more money than US fighters?
Collapse
-
Comment
-
Relative to the USA, the UK is a tiny island (UK in red):
It's a condensed island which makes it very easy to market to. Boxing is also one of their few entertainments, just look at the size of that island, it's a fraction of what we have to offer in America.Comment
-
I think Tyson Fury and Anthony Joshua are bigger draws than Deontay Wilder, for two big reasons:
-They've fought better competition, in a shorter amount of time. Joshua has 21 fights, and he's beaten Wladimir Klitschko [3x world champ and lineal], Parker [WBO champ], Whyte [just beat Parker], and Martin [IBF champ]. When Fury had 25 fights, he beat the same Klitschko when he was still holding the WBC, WBO and IBF titles, and was on a decade-long winning streak. He also beat Chisora twice. Not shitting on Wilder, but his best wins in 40 fights were against Stiverne [WBC champ] and Ortiz. Ortiz is a good fighter, but he was like 38 when he fought Wilder, and unlike the older Klitschko, he never won a world title, let alone got as close to being undisputed as Klitschko did. Stiverne was a paper champ, but to be fair, so was Martin
-UK boxing fans are more eager to support their fighters. Anthony Joshua could fight Rod Salka and probably sell out a stadium. Meanwhile, as far as I know, most casuals didn't even know about Terence Crawford, when he was tearing the jr welterweight division to shreds.Last edited by Slicc; 09-22-2018, 04:18 PM.Comment
-
Someone clearly didn't go to business school lololComment
-
Youre enforcing the point. Premier League teams are as rich as NFL/NBA teams despite operating in a smaller marketComment
-
Comment
-
Comment
Comment