Comments Thread For: HBO's Lampley: Overwhelming Majority Saw Golovkin Win, Twice
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
the winner is the guy who could not get his game going, and got his face all lumped up
no, wait..... that sounds fkn ******ed
the winner is obviously the other guy..... the guy who COULD get his game going, and DID NOT get his face all lumped up
Comment
-
Yea. I mean, thats as close of a fight as you can have without being a draw, right? 7-5 is literally as close as you can get without a draw.
And why do mfers have to get so pissy? WTF are you telling me to shut up for? Im talking boxing moron. If you dont like it, turn off your station.Comment
-
-
Comment
-
It's actually quite surprising to read a few comments in regards to the Euro commentators because that's the commentary I had to listen to. The bias was strong, even during rounds that Canelo clearly won.
GGG won the first fight, Canelo won the second. Bring on the third...Comment
-
Im with Breadman on saying Canelo won 6-7 rounds and GGG 5-6. So a draw was good but 7-5 is how I scored it. I thought Canelo was gonna knock him out in the early rounds but GGG showed that ATG Chin...And came back!!! Props to GGG too bad his prime was when the MW division was Dog Sht on top of more Sht. Kurbsidze, Tureno, Blanco, Gimpy Heiland, Wade were #1's.Last edited by Shadoww702; 09-22-2018, 11:00 AM.Comment
-
Comment
-
I wondered how this thread got to 41 pages.
Now I see that 20 pages are just this sad case loser J.Razor posting the same inane, repetitive garbage.
The odds were well off on this fight. I got Canelo Alvarez decision at $3.35 and his mainline at $2.50. I can't believe he was such a significant underdog.
I cleaned up on this fight so I'm happy with the verdict. Canelo brought the fight to GGG and landed some beastly blows. He deserves credit for that.Comment

.jpg)
.jpg)
Comment