The hate/bias boxingscene and most press have against Mexican fighers

[saopaulo]

You can look at their record when its a Mexican fighter vs a fighter from another country...in this case canelo vs ggg- boxingscene has posted articles of ggg supporters almost everyday since the fight but the only one for canelo...from the wbc president. None pointing out how most of the top fighters/former fighters some now trainers had canelo beating ggg...today they posted a nacho article for ggg but no Mayweather SR. For canelo...here is a list...

M Tyson
G Foreman
JC Chavez
M Cotto
R Garcia
J Arce
W Monroe
C Traux
A Trout
C Bundridge
A Ward
A Khan
MA Barrera
Mikey G
Andy Lee
Martin Murray
E Spence
Sergio Mora
B Hopkins
J Linares
P Quillin
T Bellew
D Haye
F Mayweather SR
E Morales
D Lemieux
J Williams
P Smith
L Smith
J Charlo

Fighters of all races and nationalities...aside from all of this, articles on good things ggg did but few if any pointing out canelo's good work. It is obvious what websites like this one try to do and most websites post the same biased garbage from the same "writers" and show no neutrality...and if you're a true fight fan call them out!

wrong d-ickhead canelo is a cheating azz roid abuser.. so what part of that dont you understand? is it the ster or roids. either way f-uck off u braindead moron

[THEFRESHBRAWLER]

Well I guess we need a trilogy

[bigdunny1]

ive seen nothing but praise for canelos performance even by people who thought he lost

exactly these media dudes were like canelo looked great amazing he did this and that GGG didn't what I expected blah blah blah but I still scored it a draw. lol Or after all that I still scored it GGG. This is called trying to save face and not officially give the win to Canelo even though they know GGG lost but they can't take GGG's poster down and be objective. They giving Canelo praise but backhanding him by at the end saying but I don't think he won. You can't have this many people who been in boxing their entire life fighters, trainers and professional judges seeing it one way and NONE of the media scoring it that way. If fighters saw it different from judges or trainers saw it different from fighters ect. but they in large numbers saying canelo won and nobody from the Dorito finger tips media score it for Canelo? They were bias going in and showed it in how they scored it and the narrative they trying to create after the fight.

[KO MX]

Hate is justified because Mexican fighters are cheats. You are just a biased fangirl if you can't understand.

Hey bro, Lil g's 0 belongs to Canelo now he is now the best MW of the world, how do you feel about that?

[KO MX]

In spanish, there are a lot of pages that are anti-mexican like solo boxeo.


Media hates mexicans.

Solo boxeo is ***ing ridiculous is basically an anti mexican site and they live of it

[Madison Boxing]

exactly these media dudes were like canelo looked great amazing he did this and that GGG didn't what I expected blah blah blah but I still scored it a draw. lol Or after all that I still scored it GGG. This is called trying to save face and not officially give the win to Canelo even though they know GGG lost but they can't take GGG's poster down and be objective. They giving Canelo praise but backhanding him by at the end saying but I don't think he won. You can't have this many people who been in boxing their entire life fighters, trainers and professional judges seeing it one way and NONE of the media scoring it that way. If fighters saw it different from judges or trainers saw it different from fighters ect. but they in large numbers saying canelo won and nobody from the Dorito finger tips media score it for Canelo? They were bias going in and showed it in how they scored it and the narrative they trying to create after the fight.

lots of fighters scored it for golovkin including the fighter you all say is the best in the sport, crawford. theres no bias. i scored the fight for ggg but canelo fought very well and showed a lot of balls.

[bigdunny1]

lots of fighters scored it for golovkin including the fighter you all say is the best in the sport, crawford. theres no bias. i scored the fight for ggg but canelo fought very well and showed a lot of balls.

I never said no fighters scored if for GGG but we agree on the simple fact that a LOT of fighters, trainers and the judges thought Canelo won? If that is true then why in the media almost NON will admit or scored the fight for Canelo? Why is the ratio of who won so skewed from what the judges, fighters and trainers saw from what the "media" saw? Simple question how can 95% of media NOT think Canelo won in a fight you said could go either way. Either means both fighters right? Yet the scores from the Media were majority draw, then few GGG winning and virtually none Canelo winning and that doesn't line up to what the judges saw, fighters, and trainers saw. So either EVERYONE is just paid off including Dave Morreti the only judge to score the first fight for GGG who turned around and said Canelo won this fight OR something went down with the media who refused to admit Canelo won or give him a fair chance on their scorecards.

[jas]

The media did not ask canelo or his team many questions about his failed drug test

Completely refutes your point

[iamboxing]

Very true, Foreman, Tyson, Morales, Ward etc...boxing icons of the sport give Canelo the nod yet barely get a mention.

LOL at all those names on the list, some of the biggest icons in boxing...they'd all get a separate thread plus article if they'd said Canelo lost. Majority of Americans plain hate Mexicans. They hate any country they can't subjugate especially if they're neighbours...Canada and Mexico aren't slavey enough for them.

[Boksfan]

You are better than that. Why stoop to their level?

Well there were few, Margarito was a criminal and lately Alvarez doing all the wrong things for boxing. They have bad opinion for a reason.