Apparently however most people are both. Or they're too lazy to actually analyze the fight and so they just piggyback off of other people's opinions and feel validated by others like them, piggybacking off other people's piggybacks.
I would bet my nuts, that after watching the fight the first time, 75% of the people on here will never watch the full 12 rounds again, to actually decipher everything that's going on.
They instead use other people's opinions to validate their memory of the fight, which are based off of other people's opinions.
Less than 15% probably know what the **** they're actually talking about.
And yet here you are on a boxing forum instead of at ringside judging fights...
You automatically assume a ring judge makes more money than me lol
Never brought up money or assumed anything. Just saying oh wise all knowing boxing historian since he was 6 years old. That you are here on a boxing forum shouting from the roof tops that if people do not agree with you then they do not know what they are talking about. Instead of actually judging fights.
Never brought up money or assumed anything. Just saying oh wise all knowing boxing historian since he was 6 years old. That you are here on a boxing forum shouting from the roof tops that if people do not agree with you then they do not know what they are talking about. Instead of actually judging fights.
This is getting petty man.
I'll just end it with this and logoff. All I said is that it's not hard to score a fight. If you know which punches landed and which punches didn't then the winner becomes less of an opinion and more of who's keeping better score.
Is that enough reason to give him the close rounds though?
Absolutely not. I think the judges gave Canelo the benefit of the doubt more than they did for Golovkin. It was a close fight but I thought GGG won it. But you have to give Canelo a lot of credit for both fights with Golovkin...I mean, he showed he's a damn good fighter and tough as nails.
I know what I saw, and anyone that disagrees with me can't score a fight.
I've grown up my whole life surrounded by morons so I'm used to being the only guy that's right in the room sometimes.
7-5 To canelo. No other way to score it. The 5th round was the only one that might even be questionable and even then the best I can give Golovkin is a draw.
I'm not blind, I've been a student of the game since I was 6 years old, and Canelo won that fight.
I'll just end it with this and logoff. All I said is that it's not hard to score a fight. If you know which punches landed and which punches didn't then the winner becomes less of an opinion and more of who's keeping better score.
But then punch stats do not tie up with your scores. Because using technology we can gauge pretty fairly which punches landed and how many per fighter per round....
Comment