Comments Thread For: De La Hoya Fires Back at Critics of Canelo's Win Over Golovkin

[twosweethooks]

Bro get out your feelings and take that L. Canelo beat ggg both fights! What happened? Your boy wanted a Mexican style fight and cried bit.ched and moaned for it and canelo was nice enough to give your boy what he wanted, along with an a.ss whooping.... Bahahahha stop crying you sound like an emotional unstable lesbian.

Come on dumbass you can act better than some ****** idiot. You speak as a child or som degenerate. No need for that.

One day Canelo will be old and some young warrior will plant his ass on the mat to stay. Just recall the days of your youth . If you become a real man in that day you will think and act differently.

Right now enjoy the win. All great fighters eventually lose.

[Robi13]

Come on dumbass you can act better than some ****** idiot. You speak as a child or som degenerate. No need for that.

One day Canelo will be old and some young warrior will plant his ass on the mat to stay. Just recall the days of your youth . If you become a real man in that day you will think and act differently.

Right now enjoy the win. All great fighters eventually lose.

Yeah well that day aint today and sure as hell wasn't Saturday night either. You talked a bunch of sh.it you and all yhe gggroupies on here about mexican style what happened? Oh I get it, the "old" excuse... If that's the case then you and all your fellow gggroupies can't cry for a 3rd fight because he is already old.. So phuck the 3rd fight. If I was canelo I wouldn't give those cry babies another check... Only if its 75-25 or greater for canelo lmao... Bums

[KillaMane26]

This ^^^^°
I've noticed that also. They were even hoping Josesito Lopez would beat Canelo you could tell by how fervously they cheered when Lopez landed anything. That's just an example but generally this is the story in every fight where a mexican headlines.

I think that was moreso people cheering for the underdog. Canelo wasnt even as disliked at the time

[Rare_Pure]

I think that was moreso people cheering for the underdog. Canelo wasnt even as disliked at the time

Well I was reffering todo the telecast calling the fight as a example

[1Qbobo26]

I dont, especially him trying to wash his hands of the "dela hoya bought off the judges" part. Ppl developed that notion because of Canelo always getting the benefit of the doubt when HE SHOULDNT. If scoring fights are based off of ring generalship, effective aggression, clean punching and defense than why didnt Eslandy Lara get the win when he clearly outshined Canelo in all those areas? Why did one of the judges score Mayweathers obliteration over Canelo a draw, didnt Mayweather not outshine him in all categories?

[lightsoutrome]

Few things to think about

*HBO only cash cow is Canelo
*About to break Hopkins record
*De La Hoya threatening to leave HBO
*Vegas

Any coincidence this happened

🤷🏻*♂️🤷🏻*♂️🤷🏻*♂️

Not at all and the fact that HBO was talking trilogy before the fight as well.

[sterilizer]

Rd 1 golovkin
Rd 2 Canelo
Rd 3 Canelo
Rd 4 golovkin
Rd 5 golovkin
Rd 6 even
Rd 7 Canelo
Rd 8 golovkin
Rd 9 golovkin
Rd 10 golovkin
Rd 11 golovkin
Rd 12 Canelo
7-4 to golovkin with one even round.
That is why de la Hoya and Canelo are getting criticised.
Golovkin won more rounds , landed more punches and noticeably hurt Canelo on at least 3 occasions over the last 3rd of the fight.
Yes Canelo was coming forward but he was eating jabs all night and was out worked.
Give props to Canelo for a great fight and showed real heart but he never beat golovkin Saturday and punch stats prove it

Canelo was not only eating jabs, very hard jabs all fight long, he also ate bunches of uppercuts, straights, hooks, overhands, you name it. And he missed bunches of times into the air, which looked pathetic, and lots of his punches went directly into GGG's arms. In the 10th round he was being battered and very close to getting a knock down. That situation never happened the other way around.

Canelo was brave, aggressive, entertaining, bold, and spectacular at times. But he ate lots and lots of punches. He received more than he connected. And he threw less. And he got more damaged, to the point of being close to a knock down. If that's what De la Hoya calls "good defense," and "effective aggression" then wow, he either needs his eyes to be checked or he is simply lying through his teeth to protect his biggest (or his only) cash cow.

We can see bunches of people who weren't here BEFORE THE FIGHT cheering so much for Canelo, saying now that he won clearly. Fair weather friends, as usual.

But the facts are the facts. Today, Canelo is the boxing star that has, by far, the compilation of most polemic decisions, and is the only one who fought several fights in a made-up weight-class, 155 pounds, versus much smaller opponents, to finally get the guts to go to his real weight division, middle weight.

Practically all his latest fights that ended with a decision, with the exception of the one vs. pathetic Chavez Jr., are polemic, debatable and a case can easily be made to see his opponent as the winner:

Mayweather Jr. (the card with a draw)
Trout (many saw Trout as the winner and he connected more punches and was the aggressor most of the fight)
Lara (same case as above except the aggressor part)
Cotto (even Mexican television commentators saw Cotto as the winner and I have no idea how Compubox gave Canelo more connected punches than Cotto, that is simply not true). Also, one card gave Canelo almost all rounds in his favor, which was simply beyond ridiculous).
GGG (same exact case, many people saw him as the winner in both fights, and he connected more punches and harder punches in both fights, also one card in the 1st fight gave Canelo almost all rounds in his favor, that was simply an insult to boxing).

The history of polemic decisions in favor of Canelo speaks for itself.

I don't hate Canelo, he showed lots of guts, determination, attitude, aggression, he acted like a real Mexican in a fight for the first time, and that's great and I really wish he keeps doing that from now on against anyone. Specially against opponents in their prime, like he is now.

But being entertaining, brave, appealing to the audience, doesn't make him the more effective fighter. He missed more and he got connected more, and he also got hurt in one round, real bad. Also,compared to GGG he doesn't even have a jab. All that has to be factored in, not just his attitude and aggressive stance.

We will see what happens. We haven't seen him KO any A-class fighter as of yet. Not even knock them down. What I mean is, we haven't seen him CLEARLY AND CONVINCINGLY win any fight against an A-class fighter. His decisions in key fights ARE ALWAYS CONTROVERSIAL and that has nothing to do with being a hater of him or a deluded fan of his opponent. For example, I totally dislike Maywether, Lara and Cotto, yet I can easily see that all three decisions in those fights had a big element of controversy surrounding them.

Finally, what ODLH said about these two being "the best in the business fighting each other" is simply beyond ridiculous. None of the two, specially Canelo, has ever been the #1 P4P king, not even close. GGG is over the hill and he fought mostly tomato cans until he faced Jacobs.

But one has to admit it, that fight GGG and Canelo just had was AWESOME, a great action fight, one of those so evenly contested ones, that are enjoyable from beginning to end, similar to that rivalry between Manny and JMM. That's good for boxing. But that does not mean Canelo is the best, or that he legitimately won any of the two fights.

[Robi13]

Canelo was not only eating jabs, very hard jabs all fight long, he also ate bunches of uppercuts, straights, hooks, overhands, you name it. And he missed bunches of times into the air, which looked pathetic, and lots of his punches went directly into GGG's arms. In the 10th round he was being battered and very close to getting a knock down. That situation never happened the other way around.

Canelo was brave, aggressive, entertaining, bold, and spectacular at times. But he ate lots and lots of punches. He received more than he connected. And he threw less. And he got more damaged, to the point of being close to a knock down. If that's what De la Hoya calls "good defense," and "effective aggression" then wow, he either needs his eyes to be checked or he is simply lying through his teeth to protect his biggest (or his only) cash cow.

We can see bunches of people who weren't here BEFORE THE FIGHT cheering so much for Canelo, saying now that he won clearly. Fair weather friends, as usual.

But the facts are the facts. Today, Canelo is the boxing star that has, by far, the compilation of most polemic decisions, and is the only one who fought several fights in a made-up weight-class, 155 pounds, versus much smaller opponents, to finally get the guts to go to his real weight division, middle weight.

Practically all his latest fights that ended with a decision, with the exception of the one vs. pathetic Chavez Jr., are polemic, debatable and a case can easily be made to see his opponent as the winner:

Mayweather Jr. (the card with a draw)
Trout (many saw Trout as the winner and he connected more punches and was the aggressor most of the fight)
Lara (same case as above except the aggressor part)
Cotto (even Mexican television commentators saw Cotto as the winner and I have no idea how Compubox gave Canelo more connected punches than Cotto, that is simply not true). Also, one card gave Canelo almost all rounds in his favor, which was simply beyond ridiculous).
GGG (same exact case, many people saw him as the winner in both fights, and he connected more punches and harder punches in both fights, also one card in the 1st fight gave Canelo almost all rounds in his favor, that was simply an insult to boxing).

The history of polemic decisions in favor of Canelo speaks for itself.

I don't hate Canelo, he showed lots of guts, determination, attitude, aggression, he acted like a real Mexican in a fight for the first time, and that's great and I really wish he keeps doing that from now on against anyone. Specially against opponents in their prime, like he is now.

But being entertaining, brave, appealing to the audience, doesn't make him the more effective fighter. He missed more and he got connected more, and he also got hurt in one round, real bad. Also,compared to GGG he doesn't even have a jab. All that has to be factored in, not just his attitude and aggressive stance.

We will see what happens. We haven't seen him KO any A-class fighter as of yet. Not even knock them down. What I mean is, we haven't seen him CLEARLY AND CONVINCINGLY win any fight against an A-class fighter. His decisions in key fights ARE ALWAYS CONTROVERSIAL and that has nothing to do with being a hater of him or a deluded fan of his opponent. For example, I totally dislike Maywether, Lara and Cotto, yet I can easily see that all three decisions in those fights had a big element of controversy surrounding them.

Finally, what ODLH said about these two being "the best in the business fighting each other" is simply beyond ridiculous. None of the two, specially Canelo, has ever been the #1 P4P king, not even close. GGG is over the hill and he fought mostly tomato cans until he faced Jacobs.

But one has to admit it, that fight GGG and Canelo just had was AWESOME, a great action fight, one of those so evenly contested ones, that are enjoyable from beginning to end, similar to that rivalry between Manny and JMM. That's good for boxing. But that does not mean Canelo is the best, or that he legitimately won any of the two fights.

you need to sterilize your agenda, you go on to make your claim that ggg outlanded canelo but then turn around and say you have no idea how compubox had canelo with more landed punches then cotto and that compubox was wrong... So compubox proved that ggg won, and was off with cotto? Bro cut it out, canelo won and is a better fighter than ggg will ever be and he is still only 28... Those are facts. Also, you go on to spew more b.s. according to your agenda by saying canelo has not clearly won or knocked out any class a fighter... Well how about ggg? List his a class fighters he has clearly beat and or ko'd.... I'll wait.

[REYESdelBOXEO]

👑KINGNELO-ALVAREZ #1 P4P🇲🇽🥊

Who's next?

[sterilizer]

you need to sterilize your agenda, you go on to make your claim that ggg outlanded canelo but then turn around and say you have no idea how compubox had canelo with more landed punches then cotto and that compubox was wrong... So compubox proved that ggg won, and was off with cotto? Bro cut it out, canelo won and is a better fighter than ggg will ever be and he is still only 28... Those are facts. Also, you go on to spew more b.s. according to your agenda by saying canelo has not clearly won or knocked out any class a fighter... Well how about ggg? List his a class fighters he has clearly beat and or ko'd.... I'll wait.

1) I am not a bro, I am female. Women also watch boxing. So let's now see you spew some misogynist garbage, I will wait.

2) I have no agenda and Canelo DID NOT WIN CLEARLY. That is just YOUR OPINION.

3) He HAS NOT KO'D ANY A-CLASS FIGHTER. Even tiny Manny KO'd a much bigger and prime Cotto. And he knocked down Mosley, something Canelo could never do either. A huge two-divisions bigger Canelo couldn't even knock down an over the hill, way smaller Cotto.

4) I won't waste any more time arguing with you. You love the redhead guy, that's nice. Keep on riding on his bandwagon while that lasts. I am sure it won't be too long. He is not that good and that will be proven soon enough.