All jokes aside, the scorecards were honestly terrible.

[mcdonalds]

You must be blind because even the most loyal Mexican fans couldn't give Canelo that many rounds.

Same with the judges.
Same with EVERY SINGLE boxing publication. (Feel free to take your pick?)
Same with the majority of boxing fans.

You got nothing to prove your opinion. You might as well show me a snowball and claim that global warming isnt real because snow exists and ignore all the people who are considered experts in the field eh?

That's what you're doing

Do you want to go gif for gif of the punches landed for round 1? Enough with the talk

[R-Hand Southpaw]

Do you want to go gif for gif of the punches landed for round 1? Enough with the talk

That's short for "I cant actually prove anything and have no way to refute anything you said".

Prove me wrong you said. I did. No one agrees with you and no one got the time of day wasting time making cherry picked gifs.

Press scores:

Harold Lederman (HBO Sports): 116-112 Golovkin

Brian Campbell (CBS sports): 116-112 Golovkin

Dan Rafael (ESPN): 114-114 draw

Salvador Rodríguez (ESPN Mexico): 114-114 draw

Gareth A Davies (The Telegraph): 116-112 Golovkin

Josh Peter (USA Today): 115-113 Golovkin

Sports Illustrated: 114-114 draw

Dylan Hernandez (LA Times): 115-113 Golovkin

Lance Pugmire (La Times): 114-114 draw

Box Scene: 114-114 draw

Chris Mannix (Yahoo! Sports): 115-113 Golovkin

Kevin Iole (Yahoo! Sports): 114-114 draw

The Guardian: 116-112 Golovkin

Joe DePaolo (Washington Post): 115-113 Golovkin

Mike Coppinger (Ring Magazine): 114-114 draw

Sherdog: 116-112 Golovkin

Jai Bednall (news.com.au): 115-113 Golovkin

Brian Mazique (Forbes): 114-114 draw

Adam Abramowitz (Ring Magazine and SN Boxing): 115-113 Golovkin

Tom Craze (Bad Left Hook): 116-112 Golovkin

Fraser Coffeen (Bloody Elbow): 115-113 Golovkin

The Associated Press: 114-114 draw

Bill Simmons (HBO and The Ringer): 114-114 draw

Steven Muehlhausen (Sporting News): 116-112 Golovkin

Michael Montero (MonteroOnBoxing): 115-113 Golovkin

Matt Christie (Boxing News): 115-114 Golovkin

George Willis (New York Post): 114-114 draw

Below The Belt Podcast: 115-113 Golovkin

World Boxing News: 115-113 Golovkin

Jeff Powell (Daily Mail): 116-113 Golovkin

Nah. All these people must be wrong too.

[mcdonalds]

That's short for "I cant actually prove anything and have no way to refute anything you said".

Prove me wrong you said. I did. No one agrees with you and no one got the time of day wasting time making cherry picked gifs.

Press scores:

Harold Lederman (HBO Sports): 116-112 Golovkin

Brian Campbell (CBS sports): 116-112 Golovkin

Dan Rafael (ESPN): 114-114 draw

Salvador Rodríguez (ESPN Mexico): 114-114 draw

Gareth A Davies (The Telegraph): 116-112 Golovkin

Josh Peter (USA Today): 115-113 Golovkin

Sports Illustrated: 114-114 draw

Dylan Hernandez (LA Times): 115-113 Golovkin

Lance Pugmire (La Times): 114-114 draw

Box Scene: 114-114 draw

Chris Mannix (Yahoo! Sports): 115-113 Golovkin

Kevin Iole (Yahoo! Sports): 114-114 draw

The Guardian: 116-112 Golovkin

Joe DePaolo (Washington Post): 115-113 Golovkin

Mike Coppinger (Ring Magazine): 114-114 draw

Sherdog: 116-112 Golovkin

Jai Bednall (news.com.au): 115-113 Golovkin

Brian Mazique (Forbes): 114-114 draw

Adam Abramowitz (Ring Magazine and SN Boxing): 115-113 Golovkin

Tom Craze (Bad Left Hook): 116-112 Golovkin

Fraser Coffeen (Bloody Elbow): 115-113 Golovkin

The Associated Press: 114-114 draw

Bill Simmons (HBO and The Ringer): 114-114 draw

Steven Muehlhausen (Sporting News): 116-112 Golovkin

Michael Montero (MonteroOnBoxing): 115-113 Golovkin

Matt Christie (Boxing News): 115-114 Golovkin

George Willis (New York Post): 114-114 draw

Below The Belt Podcast: 115-113 Golovkin

World Boxing News: 115-113 Golovkin

Jeff Powell (Daily Mail): 116-113 Golovkin

Nah. All these people must be wrong too.

I'm willing to PROVE what i said with REAL EVIDENCE. So either back up your point with Gifs from the first round of the fight or STFU

Quoting media scorecards who have been on GGG's dck for the past 3 years doesnt do anything.

ITS TIME TO SHOW AND PROVE.

['b']

97kPPVbumlovkin was lucky he got a draw in the first fight and only lost via MD in the 2nd

[champion4ever]

As I said previously, the judges got it right this time. This fight was no robbery. It was just a close fight, in which the three official judges thought Canelo just barely edged out.

Therefore, I have no qualms about this decision. The fight was so close, that it could have been a draw or could have gone either way.

Therefore, there were no losers or winners in this fight; Just two championship gladiators fighting their hearts out with honor and glory while leaving that ring like the champions they entered it.

[R-Hand Southpaw]

I'm willing to PROVE what i said with REAL EVIDENCE. So either back up your point with Gifs from the first round of the fight or STFU

Quoting media scorecards who have been on GGG's dck for the past 3 years doesnt do anything.

ITS TIME TO SHOW AND PROVE.

Oh. So you're the one who determines if evidence is real or not huh? If it doesn't fit your agenda its not real evidence eh?

Tell me wise one. You claim that jabs dont mean anything and power punching is where it's at. Tell me. How many jabs equals one power punch?

Because you're logic is full of **** and you dont know **** about the sport you watch.

The cherry on top though is that you're expecting me to waste my time making gifs to prove to some idiot hes wrong because well, everyone thinks otherwise. And when they do that, you first instinct is talk about riding GGGs ****.

Tell me how this is the case when Canelo is the "face of boxing" and "the A" side? You're telling me every major boxing publication all rides GGGs **** ?

Your excuses are just as bad as the bad Mexican beef story.

No wonder you're a Canelo fan. Good day sir. You've wasted enough of my time already. You cant change the mind of someone who cant open their mind.