Comments Thread For: Andre Ward: Canelo Won Clearly, He Broke Golovkin
Collapse
-
-
i mean its not like fat dan has a bull**** blog, he writes for ESPN and hes been doing it for a long time. All im saying is, and we can use Fat Dan as an example, is that he has the experience of sitting ringside and scoring every fight he covers. unless its like an andre ward or a paulie malignaggi who both work as analysts, is much more believable.You don't think fighters watch a lot of fights? What experience/qualifications have reporters like fat dan got to judge a fight? He's not a judge either. Anyone can start writing about boxing that doesn't know ****. But their opinion is more or as valuable? I disagree.
the media press should not be discredited. in your logic, the Nevada Athletic State Commission should hire retired/ex fighters to judge these fights, for the simple fact that they have fought before.Comment
-
I believe the commissions would if the fighters were interested. I don't believe many are interested.i mean its not like fat dan has a bull**** blog, he writes for ESPN and hes been doing it for a long time. All im saying is, and we can use Fat Dan as an example, is that he has the experience of sitting ringside and scoring every fight he covers. unless its like an andre ward or a paulie malignaggi who both work as analysts, is much more believable.
the media press should not be discredited. in your logic, the Nevada Athletic State Commission should hire retired/ex fighters to judge these fights, for the simple fact that they have fought before.Comment
-
Comment
-
Ward's boxing nous is immense
he has instincts that most fans don't even know exist
which of the ONLY valid scoring criteria was Golovkin superior ?
aight then* clean hard punching
* effective aggression
* ring generalship
* defenceComment
-
-
So then who has scored more fights ringside and has more experience and skill at doing it the judges or fat boy Dan? But you discredit the judges opinion none of which thought GGG won. And fighters and trainers could all do what that unprofessional phuk does. Don't put that loser on a pedestal he scoring the fight openly rooting for GGG before the fight and has a pic of GGG as his Twitter background page on some fanboy shyt and we supposed to think that bias won't leak in his scorecard? Bytch please loli mean its not like fat dan has a bull**** blog, he writes for ESPN and hes been doing it for a long time. All im saying is, and we can use Fat Dan as an example, is that he has the experience of sitting ringside and scoring every fight he covers. unless its like an andre ward or a paulie malignaggi who both work as analysts, is much more believable.
the media press should not be discredited. in your logic, the Nevada Athletic State Commission should hire retired/ex fighters to judge these fights, for the simple fact that they have fought before.Last edited by bigdunny1; 09-19-2018, 10:58 PM.Comment
-
The 3 people who were actually paid to judge the fight collectively thought Canelo won. So what now?7https://twitter.com/HeavyBagBoxing/s...136604161?s=19
Here's a link to the actual press row scorecards. You know, people who actually sit down at the fight with a pen and paper and score it. Not people who are casually asked who they thought won. Btw the fact that you took the time to post what you did is pathetic. Do you have a job, woman, or life whatsoever? Or do you just love Canelo that much?Comment
-
So we cant believe Fat Dan becuase he has a picture of GGG on his twitter background? How old are your bro, 12?So then who has scored more fights ringside and has more experience and skill at doing it the judges or fat boy Dan? But you discredit the judges opinion none of which thought GGG won. And fighters and trainers could all do what that unprofessional phuk does. Don't put that loser on a pedestal he scoring the fight openly rooting for GGG before the fight and has a pic of GGG as his Twitter background page on some fanboy shyt and we supposed to think that bias won't leak in his scorecard? Bytch please lol
In your logic you cant question a judge, one of whom scored it 118-110 for Canelo the first time around, because they are incapable of being wrong, inept, or even corrupt? There are so many factors why Canelo got the decision, and outscoring GGG was not one of them. A mexican house fighter in Las Vegas got the decision because thats whats best for the "business of boxing". I guess that falls under the "corrupt" category.
F*** off now please.Comment
-
1 judges card was bad the others were fine she didn't judge the second fight. Matter fact the only judge who thought GGG won was HAND PICKED TO RETURN along with the rest of the judges that GGG camp approved. None thought he won the fight including the guy who gave him the first fight. Stop crying and making excuses. And no fat boy Dan is not impartial everyone knows It and no having a fanboy pic of GGG when you supposed to be nuetral and scoring the fight is unprofessional. Just like him getting into Twitter beefs with fighters. Nobody respects that fat phuk. And all the 60+ fighters and trainers all just think canelo won because the business too? And not because canelo walked down GGG Mexican style and rearranged his face. Look in the mirror and accept the loss and acknowledge the shyt GGG didn't do like throw body shots stand and trade instead backing up scared jabbing then the judges will give him the win and you wouldn't need to be crying making excuses like a child.So we cant believe Fat Dan becuase he has a picture of GGG on his twitter background? How old are your bro, 12?
In your logic you cant question a judge, one of whom scored it 118-110 for Canelo the first time around, because they are incapable of being wrong, inept, or even corrupt? There are so many factors why Canelo got the decision, and outscoring GGG was not one of them. A mexican house fighter in Las Vegas got the decision because thats whats best for the "business of boxing". I guess that falls under the "corrupt" category.
F*** off now please.Last edited by bigdunny1; 09-20-2018, 12:20 AM.Comment
Comment