No point. I mean what can GGG do differently to win.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Canelo Open To The Idea of a Trilogy Fight With Golovkin
Collapse
-
I had it 114 - 114 but I have no gripe with Canelo getting the nod. He took the fight to GGG which nobody expected. It was like a role reversal of the first one. The best performance of Canelo's career and I thought overall GGG was disappointing. Rarely did he follow up successes and his body work was almost non existent just like last time. He looked limited. Bring on a 3rd fight but I reckon Clean-elo has his number.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Verus View PostThe third fight is likely, but I don't think Canelo should give GGG another payday. Canelo should fight Saunders, Jacobs or other middleweights rather than Golovkin. The whining, complaining and crying by Sanchez, Golovkin and the rest of that team, as well as their acolytes on this and other websites is beyond annoying.
Comment
-
Originally posted by DramaShow View PostCharlo way down the queue, Saunders/andrade winner and the jackbs/dereyenxhenko winner should be ahead of him. He's done absolutely nothing to earn a shot and he's not gonna bring anything to the table financially compared to a 3rd fight.
Canelo vs Charlo will be ordered soon by WBC.
Comment
-
I actually thought both fights were very close and could've gone either way. If I had to give the nod to a winner, I had GGG winning the first fight, and Canelo winning the second. I would love to see a third fight. Side Note: Harold Lederman is terrible at scoring fights (so is his daughter). HBO may wanna think about replacing him as "unofficial scorer". It seems as though he never gets it right.
Comment
-
-
I'm not mad at the result but more the system. Golovkin won the first fight and probably a draw would have been the right result this time.
Golovkin is in a tough place regards lining up fights. With no belts Saunders and other pretenders and even Jacobs will not be interested. I think only Charlo would feel confident that he could use GGG as a stepping stone by getting a scalp. The trilogy makes sense financially but is pointless in Vegas, yet that is where there is more money.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Verus View PostThe third fight is likely, but I don't think Canelo should give GGG another payday. Canelo should fight Saunders, Jacobs or other middleweights rather than Golovkin. The whining, complaining and crying by Sanchez, Golovkin and the rest of that team, as well as their acolytes on this and other websites is beyond annoying.
Canelo would make half as much fighting the likes of Jacobs, and that wouldn't be a low risk fight or him, neither would Charlo.
There is no way he will fight Saunders, too likely be a stinker (styles). Golovkin again when he's yet another year older ? Big money - trilogy is on.
Comment
-
The 155lb champion took the fight to his opponent, and BEAT him.
The face of boxing, P4P #1
TRUMP VOTERS ARE SALTY
Comment
-
Originally posted by SteveM View PostI'm not mad at the result but more the system. Golovkin won the first fight and probably a draw would have been the right result this time.
Golovkin is in a tough place regards lining up fights. With no belts Saunders and other pretenders and even Jacobs will not be interested. I think only Charlo would feel confident that he could use GGG as a stepping stone by getting a scalp. The trilogy makes sense financially but is pointless in Vegas, yet that is where there is more money.
He might go Saunders to try retire with a belt if he can't get the deal he wants from the Canelo side - same mechanism as last time - sign Saunders until DLH makes sure another Canelo fight happens.
Comment
Comment